Development of a combined diphtheria vaccine based on diphtheria anatoxin with microbial adjuvant in the light of modern strategies of vaccines development

Authors

  • I Yelyseyeva Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology,
  • Ye Babich Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology,
  • L Zhdamarova Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology,
  • V Bilozersky Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology,
  • S Kolpak Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology,

Keywords:

trained innate immunity, adaptive immunity, development of vaccines, bacterial adjuvants, C.diphtheriae, mucosal vaccines, specific immunotherapy.

Abstract

The review article is devoted to the consideration of approaches to the practical implementation of the main provisions of modern ideas about the role and mechanisms of innate immunity for the development of vaccines.  Initiation of the body's immune defenses occurs through the recognition of microbial pathogens using typical molecular structures associated with pathogens (PAMPs), mediated by image recognition receptors (PRRs), which are expressed by cells of the innate immune system. Тhe so-called Toll-like receptors (TLR) play a central role in initiating immune responses. Other PRRs such as membrane-bound lectin C receptors (CLR), cytosolic proteins such as the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain - NOD-like receptors (NLR) and RIG-I-like are involved in the recognition of PAMP and the control of innate immunity. receptors (RLR), AIM-2-like receptors, and a family of enzymes that function as intracellular nucleic acid sensors, including OAS and cGAS proteins also involved in the recognition of PAMP and control of innate immunity. Innate control of adaptive immunity is now an established paradigm. PRR determines the origin of antigens recognized by receptors expressed on T cells and B cells, as well as determine the type of infection with which collides with the body, and teaches lymphocytes to induce an appropriate effector class of the immune response. A modern branch of vaccinology is a new paradigm for the development of broad-spectrum prophylactic drugs based on trained immunity (TIbV). These are vaccines that induce the learning or training of innate immune cells, the essence of which lies in their long-term metabolic and epigenetic changes, which lead to an enhanced cellular response to the second antigenic stimulus by the same or unrelated specific microbial stimulus. Because trained immunity is typically triggered by PRRs, TIbV must be formed from microbial structures containing the appropriate PRR ligands, namely, PAMPs. Unlike conventional vaccines, which aim to obtain only specific responses to vaccine-associated antigens, TIbV aims to stimulate a wider range of reactions. Broad protection can be achieved by enhancing the nonspecific effector response of innate immune cells to pathogens and using the dendritic cells activation state to enhance the adaptation of the T cell response to both specific and unrelated antigens. The concept of TIbV is in its infancy, but a number of modern anti-infective vaccines, immunomodulators and vaccine adjuvants can already be considered from the standpoint of the TIbV category. Induction can be achieved in various ways that enhance immunity, which can be involved by bacteria, fungi (β-glucan) or metabolic "trainers", as well as some cytokines. A new paradigm for drug development and therapeutic interventions for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases is also the defeat of bacterial virulence as an alternative to antimicrobial therapy. One of the many antivirulence targets is adhesion. If it is possible to suppress adhesion, accordingly, it is possible to suppress the corresponding infection. This approach forms the basis of anti-adhesive strategies that have been invented to prevent various bacterial infections. Thus, the development of vaccines that prevent the initial stage of infection is in line with the anti-adhesive strategy. A combined diphtheria vaccine based on native purified diphtheria toxoid (NODA) with an adjuvant of microbial origin is developed at the SI “IMI NAMN” at the stage of preclinical trials. As an adjuvant in the candidate vaccine, a preparation of C.diphtheriae, var.gravis, tox + native surface antigens is used, which have not undergone modification or even denaturation with chemicals and therefore contain molecular structures as similar as possible to natural PAMPs and provide targeted antigen stimulation of cells of the innate immune system, obtained by physical means of disintegration of microbial cells (ultrasound or electromagnetic radiation of extremely high frequency). Studies have shown that the nativeness of antigenic candidate drugs for adjuvants is a key element of their effectiveness. Experimental samples of diphtheria bacterial surface antigens have shown themselves as adjuvant for diphtheria toxoid, capable of replacing neurotoxic aluminum hydroxide, and immunomodulator, which increase phagocytic activity in the first and repeated antigenic stimuli, and also promote the release of nasopharyngeal mucosa of rabbits vaccinated with experimental samples of the combined diphtheria vaccine and infected with a culture of C. diphtheriae. The formation of an immunologically strong mucosal barrier is considered to be an effective strategy to prevent infection at the point of contact between microbes and the host. However, modern standards of vaccine technology usually apply only to pathogens that have already crossed the mucosal barrier. In contrast to licensed vaccines, vaccination on mucosal surfaces, including the oral route of administration of the vaccine, can successfully stimulate the humoral and cellular immune response in both systemic and mucosal areas of the entrance gate of infection to establish a broader and longer-lasting protection. Experimental samples of the combined diphtheria vaccine with bacterial adjuvant were tested using the oral route of administration of the vaccine in combined vaccination regimens, and, as the results of experiments showed, the adjuvant and phagocytosis stimulating effect of the studied candidate vaccines was maintained. The obtained data demonstrated the prospect of widespread use of oral immunization as the most natural, physically and psychologically painless way to administer vaccines both for emergencies in the diphtheria outbreak and to maintain collective diphtheria immunity by booster immunization. However, oral delivery is a complex task that requires a special composition to overcome harsh gastrointestinal environments and avoid the induction of tolerance to achieve effective protection, which requires detailed justification of oral vaccines, including key biological and physicochemical aspects of next-generation oral vaccines. Another way to increase the safety of diphtheria vaccines during repeated vaccinations, which opens up prospects for specific immune protection of persons with allergic reactions, was the experimental application of the principles of specific immunotherapy in vaccinations of experimental animals. The obtained results indicate that the previous oral administration of antigenic drugs C. diphtheriae prevented the development of allergic skin reactions in experimental rabbits with subsequent subcutaneous administration of diphtheria vaccines. Studies on the development of a combined diphtheria vaccine with an adjuvant of bacterial origin convincingly showed the immunogenicity of the obtained experimental samples of the candidate vaccine and the possibility of combining the efficacy and safety of the drug at a certain dosage and degree of purification of antigenic drug. But for further research, it will be essential to expand knowledge about the sensitive pathways of the innate immune system and to determine the rules of interaction that determine the functions of these pathways in the context of diphtheria infection. Special attention should be paid to the study of the protective effect of the drug, the study of patterns of formation of antibacterial diphtheria immunity and the determination of optimal ratios of NODA and bacterial antigen in the vaccine.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3885130

References

Gordon S. Phagocytosis: An Immunobiologic Process // Immunity. 2016. Vol. 44, N 3. С. 463–475.

Kawai T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity // Immunity. 2011. Vol. 34, N 5. С. 637–650.

Blasius A. L., Beutler B. Intracellular toll-like receptors // Immunity. 2010. Vol. 32. Р. 305–315.

Pifer R., Benson A., Sturge C.R.,Yarovinsky F .UNC93B1 is essential for TLR11 activation and IL-12-dependent host resistance to Toxoplasma gondii // J. Biol. Chem. 2011. Vol. 286. Р. 3307–3314.

Akira S., Uematsu S., Takeuchi O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity // Cell. 2006. N 124. С. 783–801.

Kawai T., Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: Update on Toll-like receptors // Nat. Immunol. 2010. Vol. 11. С. 373–384.

Wu J., Chen Z. J. Innate immune sensing and signaling of cytosolic nucleic acids // Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014. Vol. 32. Р. 461–488.

Rathinam V. A., Vanaja S. K., Fitzgerald K. A. Regulation of inflammasome signaling // Nat. Immunol. 2012. Vol. 13. Р. 333–342.

Osorio F., Reis e Sousa C. Myeloid C-type lectin receptors in pathogen recogniztion and host defense // Immunity. 2011. Vol. 34. Р. 651–664.

Loo Y.-M., Gale Jr., M. Immune signaling by RIG-I-like receptors. // Immunity. 2011. Vol. 34. Р. 680–692.

Elinav E., Strowig T., Henao-Mejia J., Flavell R. A. Regulation of the antimicrobial response by NLR proteins // Immunity. 2011. Vol. 34. Р. 665–679.

Barbalat R., Ewald S. E., Mouchess M. L., Barton G. M. Nucleic acid recognition by the innate immune system // Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011. Vol. 29. Р. 185–214.

Barber G. N. Innate immune DNA sensing pathways: STING, AIMII and the regulation of interferon production and inflammatory responses // Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2011. Vol. 23. Р. 10–20.

Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system // Nat Immunol. 2015. Vol. 16, N 4. Р. 343-53.

Sánchez-Ramón S, Conejero L, Netea MG. [et al.] Trained Immunity-Based Vaccines: A New Paradigm for the Development of Broad-Spectrum Anti-infectious Formulations // Front Immunol. 2018. N 9. Р. 2936. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6304371/

Yelyseyeva IV, Zhdamarova LA, Belozersky VI. [et al.] Study of the dynamics of phagocytic activity of neutrophils after repeated vaccinations of laboratory animals with experimental diphtheria bacterial antigenic drug // Ukrainian Journal of Medicine, Biology and Sports. 2020. Vol. 5, N 1 (23). Pp 50–55.

Netea MG, Joosten LA, Latz E, Mills KH, [et al.] Trained immunity: A program of innate immune memory in health and disease // Science. 2016. Vol. 352, N 6284.

Krawczyk CM, Holowka T, Sun J, Blagih J, Amiel E, DeBerardinis RJ, Cross JR, Jung E, Thompson CB, Jones RG, Pearce EJ. Toll-like receptor-induced changes in glycolytic metabolism regulate dendritic cell activation

// Blood. 2010 . Vol. 115, N 23. P. 4742–4749.

Mulder WJM., Ochando J, Joosten LAB. [et al.] Therapeutic targeting of trained immunity // Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019. Vol. 18, № 7. Р. 553–566.

Tan J, McKenzie C, Potamitis M. [et al.] The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease // Adv. Immunol. 2014. Vol. 121. Р. 91–119.

Spencer SP, Wilhelm C, Yang Q. [et al.] Adaptation of innate lymphoid cells to a micronutrient deficiency promotes type 2 barrier immunity // Science. 2014. Vol. 343. Р. 432–437.

Spencer SP, Belkaid Y. Dietary and commensal derived nutrients: shaping mucosal and systemic immunity // Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2012. Vol. 24. Р. 379–384.

Moura-Alves P, Faé K, Kaufmann SHE. [et al.] AhR sensing of bacterial pigments regulates antibacterial defence // Nature. 2014. Vol. 512. Р. 387–392.

Stockinger B, Di Meglio P, Gialitakis M, Duarte JH. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: multitasking in the immune system // Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014. Vol. 32. Р. 403–432.

Venkatesh M, Mukherjee S, Wang H. [et al.] Symbiotic bacterial metabolites regulate gastrointestinal barrier function via the xenobiotic sensor PXR and Toll-like receptor 4 // Immunity. 2014. Vol. 41. Р. 296–310.

Messina NL, Zimmermann P, Curtis N. The impact of vaccines on heterologous adaptive immunity // Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019. Vol. 25, N 12. Р. 1484-1493.

Cusumano C. K., Hultgren S. J. Bacterial adhesion – a source of alternate antibiotic targets // Drugs. 2009. Vol. 12, N 11. Р.699–705.

Cegelski L., Marshall G. R., Eldridge G. R., Hultgren S. J. The biology and future prospects of antivirulence therapies // Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008. Vol. 6, No 1. Р. 17–27. tions. Quad Sclavo Diagn. 1986. Vol. 22, N 1. Р. 68–77.

Zigangirova N. A., Gintsburg A. L. Target-specific screening of antivirulence preparations for chronic infection therapy // Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 2011. N 4. Р. 107–115.

Shoaf-Sweeney K. D., Hutkins R. W. Adherence, anti-adherence, and oligosaccharides preventing pathogens from sticking to the host // Adv Food Nutr Res. 2009. Vol. 55. Р. 101–161.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych YeM, Zhdamarova LA. Anti-adhesive Therapies as a Contemporary Means to Fight Infectious Diseases and Adherence Factors of Corynebacteria diphtheriae // Annals of Mechnikov Insitute. 2014. N 2. С. 7–19. URL : http://www.imiamn.org.ua/journal/2_2014/PDF/4.pdf

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych YeM, Zhdamarova LA. [et al.] Anti-adhesive strategy in the development of complex anti-diphtheria vaccines as a promising measure to reduce the circulation of C. diphtheriae among the population // Children's infections. Moscow: 2015. N 3. P. 30–33.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych YeM, Zhdamarova LA. [et al.] Trained innate immunity as a basis for new strategies in vaccine development // Ukrainian Journal of Medicine, Biology and Sports. 2019. Vol. 4, N 5 (21). P. 9–17.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych EM, Belozersky VI. [et al.] Surface antigens of diphtheria pathogen obtained by physical factors as a biological platform for the development of a combined diphtheria candidate vaccine // Bulletin of problems biology and medicine. 2018. N 3 (145). P. 251–256.

Chaplin DD. Overview of the immune response // J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010. Vol. 125, N 2 Suppl 2. Р. 3-23.

Mattos-Guaraldi AL, Moreira LO, Damasco PV, Hirata R. Júnior. Diphtheria remains a threat to health in the developing world – an overview // Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2003. Vol. 98. Р. 987–989.

Petrusevich TV. Causes of diphtheria in vaccinated: author's ref. dis. … PhD. Science: 14.02.02. Kyiv, 2004. 32 p.

Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011 – 2020. Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals. URL : https://www.path.org/resourc es/global-vaccine-action-plan-2011-2020/

Mokrousov I. Corynebacterium diphtheriae: genome diversity, population structure and genotyping perspectives // Infect Genet Evol. 2009. Vol. 9, N 1. Р. 1-15.

Kolodkina V, Titov L, Sharapa T. [et al] Molecular epidemiology of C. diphtheriae strains during different phases of the diphtheria epidemic in Belarus // BMC Infect Dis. 2006. Vol. 6. Р. 129–137.

Chyudnaya LM, Oksiyuk VG, Krasyuk LS. [et al.] The epidemic situation of diphtheria in Ukraine // Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases. 1999. N 1. P. 10–12.

Nosov SD. Diphtheria. Infectious diseases in children in the past and present (clinical and epidemiological aspects of the evolution of infectious diseases): collection of articles. L .: Medicine, 1980. P. 38-50.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babich EM, Zhdamarova LA. [et al.] On the development of a complex diphtheria vaccine with bacterial adjuvant // Bulletin of problems of biology and medicine. 2019. Vol. 3 (152). P. 264–268.

Edsall G, Elliott MW, Peebles TC, Eldred MC. Excessive use of tetanus toxoid boosters // JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 1967. Vol. 202. Р. 111–113.

Danilova E, Shiryayev A, Skogen V. [et al.] Short-term booster effect of diphtheria toxoid in initially long-term protected individuals // Vaccine. 2005. Vol. 23. Р. 1446–1450.

Scheifele DW, Halperin SA, Ochnio JJ. [et al.] A modified vaccine reduces the rate of large injection site reactions to the preschool booster dose of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine – results of a randomized controlled trial // The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 2005. Vol. 24. Р. 1059–1066.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych YeM, Zhdamarova LA. [et al.] Adverse reactions to vaccines and ways of its prevention // Аннали Мечниковського інституту. 2011. N 1. С. 5–12. URL : http://www.imiamn.org.ua/journal/1_2011/PDF/3.pdf

Chervonskaya GP. Vaccinations: myths and reality. URL : https://www.rulit.me/books/privivki-mify-i-realnost-read-193258-1.html

Braginskaya VP, Sokolova AF. Active immunization of children: monograph. Moscow: Medicine, 1990.203 p.

Scheifele DW, Ochnio JJ, Halperin SA. Cellular immunity as a potential cause of local reactions to booster vaccination with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis antigens // Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009. Vol. 28, N 11. Р. 985–989.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych EM, Belozersky VI. [et al.] Possible ways to increase the safety of diphtheria vaccines // Bulletin of problems of biology and medicine. 2018. Vol. 1, N 1 (142). P. 252–256.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych EM, Belozersky VI. [et al.] Negative effects induced by vaccine adjuvants // Actual problems of modern medicine. Poltava, 2016. Vol. 16. N 2 (54). P. 279–286.

Shoenfeld Y, Agmon-Levin N. 'ASIA' - autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants // J. Autoimmun. 2011. Vol. 36, N 1. P. 4–8.

Shaw CA, Li Y, Tomljenovic L. Administration of aluminium to neonatal mice in vaccine-relevant amounts is associated with adverse long term neurological outcomes // J. Inorg. Biochem. 2013. Vol. 128. P. 237–244.

Gherardi RK, Eidi H, Crépeaux G. [et al.] Biopersistence and brain translocation of aluminum adjuvants of vaccines // Front Neurol. 2015. Vol. 6. P. 4.

UA. Patent. N. 86891. Спосіб отримання бактерійного дифтерійного антигену. заявл. 06.08.2013; опубл. 10.01.2014, Бюл. № 1. 4 с.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych EM, Belozersky VI. [et al.] Surface antigens of the diphtheria pathogen obtained by physical factors as a biological platform for the development of a combined diphtheria candidate vaccine // Bulletin of problems biology and medicine. 2018. N 3 (145). P. 251–256.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych EM, Zhdamarova LA. [et al.] Antigenic and adjuvant properties of experimental samples of drugs of subcellular complexes of the diphtheria pathogen in vaccination of laboratory animals // Annals of the Mechnikov Institute. 2009. N 2. P. 58–66. URL : http://www.imiamn.org.ua/journal/2_2009/PDF/13.pdf

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych EM, Zhdamarova LA. [et al.] Вивчення впливу експериментальних зразків препаратів субклітинних комплексів збудника дифтерії на активність фагоцитозу при щепленні лабораторних тварин // Аннали Мечниковського інституту. 2009. N 4. С. 19–23. URL : http://www.imiamn.org.ua/journal.htm#/

Yelyseyeva IV, Zhdamarova LA, Belozersky VI. [et al.] Study of the dynamics of phagocytic activity of neutrophils after repeated vaccinations of laboratory animals with experimental diphtheria bacterial antigenic drug // Ukrainian Journal of Medicine, Biology and Sports. 2020. Vol. 5, N 1 (23). P. 50–55.

Yelyseyeva I., Babych Eu., Kivva F. New approaches to development of diphtheria vaccine. Anti-colonization strategy for the development of a combined diphtheria vaccine with bacterial antigen component : monographic study. Publishing House: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. 2018. 104 p.

Wang J, Thorson L, Stokes RW. [et al.] Single mucosal, but not parenteral, immunization with recombinant adenoviral-based vaccine provides potent protection from pulmonary tuberculosis // J. Immunol. 2004. Vol. 173. P. 6357–6365.

Lycke N, Bemark M, Mucosal adjuvants and long-term memory development with special focus on CTA1-DD and other ADP-ribosylating toxins // Mucosal Immunol. 2010. Vol. 3. P. 556–566.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych EM, Sklyar NO. [et al.] Prospects for the use of oral vaccinations against diphtheria // Medicine today and tomorrow. 2007. N 3. P. 139–143.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych EM, Belozersky VI. [et al.] Possible ways to increase the safety of diphtheria vaccines // Bulletin of problems biology and medicine. 2018. Vol. 1, N 1 (142). P. 252–256.

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych EM, Zhdamarova LA. [et al.] Study of the effect of oral administration of antigenic drugs of the diphtheria pathogen on the development of skin reaction in rabbits // Annals of Mechnikov Insitute. 2013. N 1. C.40–43. URL : http://www.imiamn.org.ua/journal/1_2013/PDF/9.pdf

Yelyseyeva IV, Babych EM, Zhdamarova LA. [et al.] Study of the desensitizing action of purified antigenic fractions of the diphtheria pathogen obtained by physical factors // Bulletin of problems biology and medicine. 2012. Vol. 2. N 2 (93). P. 176–179.

Downloads

How to Cite

Yelyseyeva, I., Babich, Y., Zhdamarova, L., Bilozersky, V., & Kolpak, S. (2020). Development of a combined diphtheria vaccine based on diphtheria anatoxin with microbial adjuvant in the light of modern strategies of vaccines development. Annals of Mechnikov’s Institute, (2), 43–49. Retrieved from https://journals.uran.ua/ami/article/view/205067

Issue

Section

Research Articles