The optimization algorithm for the directions of influence of risk factors on the system that manages the potential of machine-building enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.139513

Keywords:

optimization algorithm, formation technology, managerial impacts, development system, financial potential, risk-oriented directionality

Abstract

The lines of influence of risk factors on the system of management of financial potential of machine-building enterprises were determined. Their application makes it possible to provide enterprises with complete and reliable information on the system of the analysis component groups necessary for making optimal management decisions, improve the system of production and technological management through the use of integrated methods focused on analysis of the entire spectrum of critical parameters of the enterprise activities and maintain its financial potential at a proper functional level. Consistency comparison of expert’s local priorities with regard to the elements of the second and third levels of the hierarchical model of choice of the neutralization method has been made. The consistency relation showing the degree of violation of numerical value of transitive consistency is the criterion for assessing local expert priorities. A random coherence of local priorities of matrices of various orders was obtained.

The algorithm of the strategy of optimization of the financial potential of machine-building enterprises was proposed taking into account influence of the risk factors. It is based on strategic tasks and principles and provides a tactical system set of methods, tools and concrete measures to implement the policy of optimizing the financial potential. It is characterized by various parametric indicators that take into account the risk-oriented optimization of enterprise’s financial potential. Depending on situation, the strategy should be adjustable and flexible for implementation in order to obtain the most positive result.

Author Biographies

Viktoriya Prokhorova, Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy Universytetska str., 16, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61003

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Organization of Activity of Subjects of Business Management

Valentina Protsenko, Department of personnel qualification of the highest qualification and licensing Peremohy ave., 10, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01135

PhD, Head of sector

Sector of licensing requirements control

Yula Bezuglaya, Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy Universytetska str., 16, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61003

PhD

Department of Economics and Organization of Activity of Subjects of Business Management

Julia Us, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics Nauky ave., 9-A, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Banking

References

  1. Babenko, V. О. (2017). Modeling of factors influencing innovation activities of agricultural enterprises of Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 2 (1 (9)), 115–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.25140/2410-9576-2017-2-1(9)-115-121
  2. Cascio, W., Boudreau, J. (2010). Investing in people – financial impact of human resource initiatives. Pearson Education, Inc., 185–199.
  3. Drucker, P. F. (1985). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 72–76.
  4. Fitzenz, J. (2010). The New HR analytics – predicting the economic value of your company's human capital investments. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn, 368.
  5. Frambach, R. T., Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55 (2), 163–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00152-1
  6. Guest, D. E., Michie, J., Conway, N., Sheehan, M. (2003). Human Resource Management and Corporate Performance in the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41 (2), 291–314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00273
  7. Padmore, T., Schuetze, H., Gibson, H. (1998). Modeling systems of innovation: An enterprise-centered view. Research Policy, 26 (6), 605–624. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00039-5
  8. Rejeb, H. B., Morel-Guimarães, L., Boly, V., Assiélou, N. G. (2008). Measuring innovation best practices: Improvement of an innovation index integrating threshold and synergy effects. Technovation, 28 (12), 838–854. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.08.005
  9. Investing in People and Ideas (1994). EDI's Strategy for the Future. The World Bank. Washington.
  10. Babenko, V., Romanenkov, Y., Yakymova, L., Nakisko, A. (2017). Development of the model of minimax adaptive management of innovative processes at an enterprise with consideration of risks. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (4 (89)), 49–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.112076
  11. Jayaprakash, R. (2004). Personnel management. APH Publishing, 115.
  12. Lawler, E. E. (1990). Strategic Pay. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 343.
  13. LeBel, P. (2008). The role of creative innovation in economic growth: Some international comparisons. Journal of Asian Economics, 19 (4), 334–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2008.04.005
  14. Program Management (2014). Program Management for Improved Business Results, 3–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118904367.ch1
  15. Monappa, A. (1996). Personnel management. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 428.
  16. Silverberg, G., Verspagen, B. (2005). A percolation model of innovation in complex technology spaces. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 29 (1-2), 225–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2003.05.005
  17. Smith, S., Mazin, R. (2011). The HR answer book – an indispensable guide for managers and human resources professionals. AMACOM, 288.
  18. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43 (2-3), 172–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
  19. Malyarets, L., Draskovic, M., Babenko, V., Kochuyeva, Z., Dorokhov, O. (2017). Theory and practice of controlling at enterprises in international business. Economic Annals-ХХI, 165 (5-6), 90–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v165-19

Downloads

Published

2018-08-15

How to Cite

Prokhorova, V., Protsenko, V., Bezuglaya, Y., & Us, J. (2018). The optimization algorithm for the directions of influence of risk factors on the system that manages the potential of machine-building enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(1 (94), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.139513

Issue

Section

Engineering technological systems