Improvement of the method of calculating a group of sound­insulating panels

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.185860

Keywords:

optimization of calculation of sound-insulating panels, excess noise load, random search, safety

Abstract

Original single-layer and multilayer structures of sound-insulating panels are considered, as well as their advantages compared to traditional analogs.

The shortcomings of the method of optimization calculation of a group of sound-insulating panels designed to reduce noise in several production rooms are analyzed. This method has limited functionality due to a relatively small number of objective functions and the corresponding conditions for their use. Given this, an improved method of optimization calculation of a group of sound-insulating panels is proposed.

The improvement of the method consists in increasing the number of objective functions intended for multipurpose optimization taking into account real production conditions. The refinement of the algorithm consists in the preliminary selection of a subgroup of panels with additional requirements for operating conditions (increased strength, fire safety, etc.). Under these conditions, the operator directionally distributes structures and materials among the selected panels.

The statement of the optimization problem of group calculation with an extended list of objective functions and restrictions is given. Recommendations on selecting an objective function in specific production conditions are given.

The regulatory requirements for noise reduction in production rooms and spectral characteristics of sound insulation of panels made of various materials are given. The spectral characteristics of noise in the room before and after application of the sound-insulating panel are also given.

The effectiveness of the method is confirmed by the steady reduction of the mathematical expectation and variance of the total noise load on people in production premises with an increase in the number of iterations. The calculation method demonstrated the reduction of excess noise load in comparison with standard methods

Author Biographies

Anatolii Bielikov, Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture Chernyshevskoho ave., 24a, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49600

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Life Safety

Oleksandr Mamontov, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics Nauky ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Occupational Safety

Ruslan Papirnyk, Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture Chernyshevskoho ave., 24a, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49600

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Building Technology

Tetiana Stytsenko, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics Nauky ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Occupational Safety

Kostiantyn Ostapov, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine Chernyshevska str., 94, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61023

PhD

Department of Fire Tactics and Rescue Operations

Volodymyr Shalomov, Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture Chernyshevskoho ave., 24a, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49600

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Life Safety

Sergey Ragimov, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine Chernyshevska str., 94, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61023

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Organization and Technical Support Rescue Operations

Andrii Melnichenko, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine Chernyshevska str., 94, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61023

Lecturer

Department of Organization and Technical Support Rescue Operations

References

  1. Health statistics and information systems. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/en/
  2. Ehsan Moosavimehr, S., Srikantha Phani, A. (2017). Sound transmission loss characteristics of sandwich panels with a truss lattice core. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141 (4), 2921–2932. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4979934
  3. Patinha, S., Cunha, F., Fangueiro, R., Rana, S., Prego, F. (2014). Acoustical Behavior of Hybrid Composite Sandwich Panels. Key Engineering Materials, 634, 455–464. doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.634.455
  4. Cameron, C. J., Lind Nordgren, E., Wennhage, P., Göransson, P. (2014). On the balancing of structural and acoustic performance of a sandwich panel based on topology, property, and size optimization. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 333 (13), 2677–2698. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.01.025
  5. Khalkhali, A., Narimanzadeh, N., Khakshournia, S., Amiri, S. (2014). Optimal design of sandwich panels using multi-objective genetic algorithm and finite element method. International Journal of Engineering, 27 (3), 395–402. Available at: http://www.ije.ir/article_72266_adb3b989a7941894512bf7c6927b94ed.pdf
  6. Wang, T., Li, S., Nutt, S. R. (2009). Optimal design of acoustical sandwich panels with a genetic algorithm. Applied Acoustics, 70 (3), 416–425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.06.003
  7. Leite, P., Thomas, M., Simon, F., Bréchet, Y. (2014). Optimal Design of a Multifunctional Sandwich Panel With Foam Core: Lightweight Design for Flexural Stiffness and Acoustical Transmission Loss. Advanced Engineering Materials, 17 (3), 311–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201400075
  8. Li, Q., Yang, D. (2018). Mechanical and Acoustic Performance of Sandwich Panels With Hybrid Cellular Cores. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 140 (6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040514
  9. Belikov, A. S., Sokolov, I. A., Shalomov, V. A., Mamontov, A. V. (2017). Improving safety in workplaces when operating the compressor units for the account of improving the calculation of sound absorption coatings. Heotekhnichna mekhanika, 135, 246–257.
  10. Mamontov, O., Stytsenko, T. (2019). Development of a method for optimization calculation of a group of sound-insulating panels for airborn noise protection. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (10 (99)), 32–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.170079
  11. Mistakidis, E. S., Stavroulakis, G. E. (1998). Nonconvex Optimization in Mechanics: Algorithms, Heuristics and Engineering Applications by the F.E.M. Springer, 288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5829-3
  12. Gurskiy, D., Turbina, E. (2006). Vychisleniya v MATHCAD 12. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 544.
  13. Kiseleva, E. G. (2011). Raschet zvukoizolyatsii ograzhdayushchih konstruktsiy zhilyh i obshchestvennyh zdaniy. Moscow: MARHI, 52.
  14. Soundproofing materials and acoustic Solutions. Sound Servise. Available at: http://www.keepitquiet.co.uk/
  15. Rybalko, O. M. (2014). Vyshcha matematyka (spetsialni rozdily). Osnovy teoriyi ymovirnostei z elementamy matematychnoi statystyky. Kharkiv: Kolehium, 359.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-04

How to Cite

Bielikov, A., Mamontov, O., Papirnyk, R., Stytsenko, T., Ostapov, K., Shalomov, V., Ragimov, S., & Melnichenko, A. (2019). Improvement of the method of calculating a group of sound­insulating panels. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(10 (102), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.185860