Identification of target system operations. Determination of the time of the actual completion of the target operation

Authors

  • Igor Lutsenko National University of Krivoy Rog 50027, Krivoy Rog, str. XXII Party Congress, 11, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28040

Keywords:

operations research, model of target operation, time of actual completion of target operation

Abstract

It was found in the paper that the time frames of the studied system operation depend on the research objective. In cases when it comes to problems, related to the physical movement of the input and output products, limits of the study are defined by the time of the beginning of the movement of the first input product of the operation and ends with the time of issue of the last output product of the operation by the system.

Time of completion of the physical movement of products is defined in the paper as the time of the physical completion of the operation.

Since the purpose of any operation is to increase the value of the output products in relation to the value of input products of the operation, in cases when there is a problem of investigating the target operation, the time of completion of the target operation is determined not by the physics of the process, but its cybernetics.

Since for the time of the operation, conversion processes link input products in time, the added value of output products is intended to compensate in time the costs of temporary binding of input products that initially have their value.

The time, when the added value of output products of the target operation compensates the value of tight input products for the time of the operation, is defined in the paper as the time of the actual completion of the target operation.

A system of notations to describe the system processes of target operations was proposed.

The expressions for the numerical and analytical determination of the time of actual completion of the target operation were obtained. A link to the resource, with examples of calculations of the time of the actual completion of the operation with the use of numerical methods and analytic expressions, obtained in the paper was given.

Author Biography

Igor Lutsenko, National University of Krivoy Rog 50027, Krivoy Rog, str. XXII Party Congress, 11

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Electrical and electricity savings

References

  1. 1. Lutsenko, I. (2014). Deployed model of extremal system operation for solving optimal management problems [Text] / I. Lutsenko // Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5/2, 112 – 116.

    2. Frederic, D. (2010). Systems modeling: analysis and operations research Modeling and Simulation Fundamentals. Published Online, 6, 147–180. doi: 10.1002/9780470590621.ch6

    3. Kirsch, D., Rajesh, R Profit from Operating Reserves (1998) The Electricity Journal. 11 (2), 40–49. doi: 10.1016/S1040-6190(98)00007-4

    4. Gupta, R., Bansal, S., Goel, L. (1993). Profit analysis of two-unit priority standby system with rest period of the operator. Microelectron. Realiab, 33 (8), 1073–1079. doi: 10.1016/0026-2714(93)90333-T

    5.Everett, E. (1981). Operations Change Interactions in a Service Environment: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Profitability Journal of Operations Management, 2 (1), 63–76. doi: 10.1016/0272-6963(81)90036-X

    6. Dmitruk, V., Koshevoy, A. (1991) On the existence of a technical efficiency criterion Journal of Economic Theory, 55 (1), 121–144. doi: 10.1016/0022-0531(91)90061-8

    7. Krause, P., Boyle, P., Bäse, F. (2005). Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment, 5, 89–97. doi: 10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005

    8. Wiersum, D., Chang, J., Lewellyn, L. (2013). An Adsorbent Performance Indicator as a First Step Evaluation of Novel Sorbents for Gas Separations. Application to Metal-Organic Frameworks Langmuir, 29 (10), 3301–3309. doi: 10.1021/la 3044329

    9. Fonarow, G., Reeves, M., Fonarow, G., Smith, E., Saver, J., Zhao, X., Olson, D., Hernandez, A., Characteristics, Petergon, E., Sehwamm, L. (2010). Characteristics, performance measures, and in-hospital outcomes of the first one million stroke and transient ischemic attack admissions in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 3 (3), 291–302. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.921858

    10. Lutsenko, I. A. (2014). Samples. Krivoy Rog. Available at: http://uk.effli.info/index.php/samples

Downloads

Published

2014-12-17

How to Cite

Lutsenko, I. (2014). Identification of target system operations. Determination of the time of the actual completion of the target operation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(2(72), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28040