Interaction of the Zymne monastery buildings with the soil base under seismic loads

Authors

  • Владимир Александрович Сахаров Kyiv National University Construction and Architecture 31, Povitroflotskiy avenue, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9381-3283

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.33652

Keywords:

seismic survey, explicit method, nonlinear modeling, soil model, automated system for scientific research (ASSR) “VESNA-DYN”

Abstract

The work presents numerous research findings on the stressstrain state of a building within the “base–basement–construction” system under a seismic load. The soil array was considered as volumetric nonlinear elastic viscose and plastic environment with a new computed behavioral pattern. The latter accounts for peculiarities of viscose and elastic deformation of marginally stiff soil under a dynamic load, elastic and plastic deformation regarding structural strength and possibilities of strengthening, and energy loss in interaction with the environment. We have revealed the underlying principles of the model. Problems can be solved effectively by the FEM-based variety of the central difference method for heterogeneous systems, which allows to increase the average time integration step and to make effective use of parallel solution methods. As an example, there was created a three-dimensional model of the Assumption (Uspensky) Cathedral of the Zymne Monastery. The modeling was based on the automated system for scientific research “VESNA-DYN” and a modified (explicit) central difference method. According to the findings, seismic loads result in irreversible plastic deformations that significantly impact the stress-strain state (SSS) of constructions. The analysis has exposed the areas of stress concentration that lead to possible damages of constructions. The research has traced emergence and evolution of a tilt resulting from irreversible soil deformations. We have estimated the overall carrying capacity of the church structures.

Author Biography

Владимир Александрович Сахаров, Kyiv National University Construction and Architecture 31, Povitroflotskiy avenue, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680

Associate professor (docent), PhD

Base and foundation department. 

References

  1. Kendzera, A. V., Pigulevskij, P. I., Shherbina, S. V. Prognozirovanie opasnyh sejsmicheskih sobytij kak obobshhennyj metod sejsmicheskogo rajonirovanija. Prognostication of hazardous seismic occurrences as generalized method of the seismic districting. Geophysical scientific publications . Available at: http://www.seismo.kiev.ua/
  2. Glazunov, Ju. V. (2004). Issledovanie dinamicheskogo vozdejstvija na sooruzhenija gorodskoj nastrojki, raspolozhennye vblizi trass metro [Study of the dynamic effects on structures urban setting, located near the subway tracks] Kommunal'noe hozjajstvo gorodov, 55, 271–276.
  3. Barabash, M. S., Darmoroz, T. L. (2008). Osoblyvosti konstruktyvnykh rishen', iaki mozhut' zastosovuvatysia do sporud karkasnoho typu dlia budivnytstva v sejsmichnykh rajonakh. Visnyk NAU, 3, 160–162.
  4. Petrenko, V. D., Tjut'kin, A. L., Stoicheva, M. B. (2014). Sravnitel'nyj analiz metodov rascheta svajnyh fundamentov pri staticheskih i dinamicheskih nagruzkah [Comparative analysis of methods of calculation of pile foundations under static and dynamic loads] Visnyk Dnipropetrovs'koho natsional'noho universytetu zaliznychnoho transportu, 50, 194–197.
  5. Dwivedi, J. P., Singh, V. P., Lal, R. K. (2011). Dynamic response of partially sealed circular tunnel in viscoelastic soil condition. Bulletin of applied mechanics, 7 (26), 37–45.
  6. Banakh, V. A. (2012). Dynamichni vplyvy pry rekonstruktsii budivel' i sporud ta ikh modeliuvannia dlia skladnykh inzhenerno-heolohichnykh umov ekspluatatsii [Dynamic effects of the renovation of buildings and structures and their modeling for complex geological conditions] Kommunal'noe khoziajstvo horodov, 105, 157–162
  7. Hetun, H. V., Sakharov, V. O., Mel'nyk, V. A. (2013). Doslidzhennia vplyvu sejsmoizoliatsii na napruzheno-deformovanyj stan vysotnoi budivli pid diieiu sejsmichnykh navantazhen' [Research of influence of isolation of seismo is on the tensely-deformed state of pitch building under the action of the seismic loading] Svit heotekhniky: Naukovo-tekhnichnyj zhurnal, 2 (38), 18–23.
  8. Mazen, R. (2009). K voprosu o vliyanii sloistosti osnovaniya na usiliya v elementakh perekrytiy dlya mnogoetazhnykh monolitnykh zhelezobetonnykh zdaniy pri seysmicheskikh vozdeystviyakh [On the effect of layering the base of the efforts in the elements for multi-storey monolithic slabs of concrete buildings under seismic actions] Kommunal'noye khozyaystvo gorodov, 86, 78–98.
  9. Boyko, I. P., Sakharov, O. S., Sakharov, V. O. (2013). Behavior of the multi-story building under seismic loads with the account of the viscoplasticity of the soil base. Proceedings International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2, 1443–1446.
  10. Bandurina, O. V. (2010). Metodyka vyznachennia osidan' fundamentiv vid dynamichnoho vplyvu [Method of determining the subsidence of the foundations of dynamic effects] Nauka ta prohres transportu. Visnyk Dnipropetrovs'koho natsional'noho universytetu zaliznychnoho transportu, 32, 18–20.
  11. Lia, M., Lub, X., Lua, X., Yea, L. (2014). Influence of soil–structure interaction on seismic collapse resistance of super-tall buildings. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 6 (5), 477–485. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.04.006
  12. Gol'dshtejn, M. N. (1971). Mehanicheskie svojstva gruntov [Mechanical properties of soils.] Moscow: Strojizdat, 368.
  13. Rzhanicyn, A. R. (1968). Teorija polzuchesti.[ Theory of creep] Moscow: Strojizdat, 418.
  14. Tercagi, K. (1961). Teorii mehaniki gruntov [Theories of mechanics of soils ] Moscow: Gosstrojizdat, 507.
  15. Krasnikov, N. D. (1970). Dinamicheskie svojstva gruntov i metody ih opredelenija. [Dynamic properties of soils and methods of their determination] Lviv: Strojizdat, 240.
  16. Sakharov, V. O. (2013). Model' nelinijnoho deformuvannia gruntovoi osnovy pry sejsmichnykh navantazhenniakh [A model of nonlinear deformation of the ground basis is at the seismic loading ] Osnovy ta fundamenty. Mizhvid. nauk.- tekhn. zb., 33, 34–46.
  17. Nikolaevskij, V. N. (1971). Opredeljajushhie uravnenija plasticheskogo deformirovanija sypuchej sredy [Qualificatory equalizations of flowage of friable environment] Prikl. mat. i meh., 35 (6), 1070–1082.
  18. Smirnov, A. F., Aleksandrov, A. V., Lashhenikov, B. Ja, Shaposhnikov, N. N. (1984). Stroitel'naja mehanika. Dinamika i ustojchivost' sooruzhenij. [Structural mechanics. Dynamics and stability of building] Moscow: Strojizdat, 416.
  19. Sakharov, V. O. (2014). Modyfikatsiia iavnoho metodu dlia efektyvnoho rozv'iazannia nelinijnykh zadach heotekhniky. [Modification of an explicit method for the efficient solution of nonlinear problems geotechnics] Osnovy ta fundamenty. Mizhvid. nauk.- tekhn. zb., 35, 116–126.
  20. Sakharov, V. (2014). An investigation of system “soil base-foundation-structure” response to seismic forces with provision for nonlinear properties of materials / Proceedings of the X Conference „Konstrukcje zespolone”, Poland – Zielona Góra, 407–426.
  21. DBN V.1.1-12:2006 (2006). Stroytel'stvo v sejsmycheskykh rehyonakh Ukrayny.[ Construction seysmycheskyh in the regions of Ukraine] Kiev: Mynstroj Ukrayny, 52.

Published

2014-12-18

How to Cite

Сахаров, В. А. (2014). Interaction of the Zymne monastery buildings with the soil base under seismic loads. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(7(72), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.33652

Issue

Section

Applied mechanics