Comparative analysis of some computational schemes for obtaining a compromise solution

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.35607

Keywords:

compromise area, optimization task, physical and chemical processes, polyfunctional biopolymer materials

Abstract

The comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the five most common computational schemes for the compromise solutions in multi-objective optimization tasks involving the convolution of criteria is conducted. The study is performed for a number of innovative technologies of formation of multifunctional biopolymer materials.

The criterion that allows to evaluate the effectiveness of different types of package is formulated. In accordance with the proposed criteria, the most effective for the regarded group of tasks is the maximin convolution. The use of the additive and multiplicative convolutions is restricted by the convex programming problems; the convolution using the Harrington’s desirability function requires testing the hypothesis of normal distribution, and the method of ideal point involves only the formulation of the necessary conditions for the existence of an extremum, so these solutions do not always meet the technological constraints.

The adaptation of computational schemes for solving the constrained optimization tasks and their software implementation using object-oriented programming language Visual Basic for Application is created.

The obtained results can be used to improve existing and develop new technologies forming biopolymer materials.

Author Biography

Olga Sanginova, National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Pobedy Ave., bld. 37 , Kiev, Ukraine, 03056

PhD, associate professor

Department of Cybernetic of Chemical Technological Processes

References

  1. Taha, H. A. (2007). Operations Research: An Introduction (8th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 819.
  2. Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application. New York: John Wiley, 546.
  3. Ostrovsky, G. M., Berezhinsky, T. A. (1984). Optimization of chemical processes. Theory and practice. Chemistry, 240.
  4. Ahnazarova, S. L., Gordeev, L. S. (2003). Application of Harrington's Desirability Function for Optimization Tasks. MUCTR publishing, 76.
  5. Bundy, B. (1988). Methods of optimization. Introductory course [Text] Translated from English. Radio and Communications, 129.
  6. Sanginova, О., Danylkovych, А., Branovitskaia, S. (2014). Multi-objective optimization in formation tasks of leather and fur materials. ScienceRise, 2 (2), 43–50. doi: 10.15587/2313-8416.2014.27262
  7. Danylkovych, A. G., Branovitskaja, S. V., Bondarenko, S. G., Sanginova O. V. (2013). Application of Box Method for Multi-objective Optimization. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3/4 (63), 4–8. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/14743/12521
  8. Kats, M. (2011). A new method for solving the problems of identification, diagnosis, prognosis and optimization of complex systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3/12(51), 17–28. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/2467/2268
  9. Zraychenko-Polozentsev, A. V. Koval, O. S., Demin, D. A. (2011). Evaluation of potential reserves of production for melting synthetic iron. Technology audit and production reserves, 1/1(1), 7–15. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/4081/3747
  10. Danylkovych, A. G., Lishchuk, V. I., Plavan, V. P., Kasian E. E., Zhyhotskyy, O. H. (2011). Environmentally oriented technology of leather and fur materials to create competitive products. In Part 2. Part I. Phoenix, 437.
  11. Danylkovych, A. G., Gryschenko, I. M., Lishchuk, V. I. et al. (2012). Innovative technology of leather and fur materials and products. Phoenix, 344.
  12. Lishchuk, V. I. Voitsekhovska, T. G., Danylkovych, A. G. (2007). Use of multi-objective optimization to find a compromise area ashing process. Light Industry, 1, 37–39.
  13. Danylkovych, A. G., Brayilko, A., Omelchenko, N. (2010). Improving the quality of secondary coverage by optimizing the coating composition. Bulletin of KNU, 3, 129–134.

Downloads

Published

2015-02-27

How to Cite

Sanginova, O. (2015). Comparative analysis of some computational schemes for obtaining a compromise solution. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(4(73), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.35607

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Cybernetics - applied aspects