Knowledge-oriented database formation for determination of complex method for quality identification of compound systems

Authors

  • Тетяна Володимирівна Козуля National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» 21 Bagaleia str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5107-9140
  • Наталья Валеріївна Шаронова National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» 21 Bagaleia str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-552X
  • Марія Михайлівна Козуля National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» 21 Bagaleia str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4090-8481
  • Ярослав Володимирович Святкін National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» 21 Bagaleia str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6828-6699

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.60590

Keywords:

decision making, quality identification, probabilistic entropy evaluation, information software, natural and man-made object

Abstract

Feasibility substantiation of resorting to the provisions of synergy and the theory of nonlinear processes of compound systems in modeling the system object behavior is considered. Any self-organizing system of social, ecological and economic content is open dissipative, which removes entropy growing in destructive phenomena in the interaction with the environment.

The use of the entropic approach to the analysis of complex objects allowed reviewing the structure of the analytical system and representing it as "0-state of the object - process - i-state of the object", the estimate of which is agreed due to the versatility of quantitative analysis based on the entropy function.

The proposed analytical system allows applying methodical approaches to solving complex problems for safety evaluation of different objects of the study.

Software for implementing the complex method for quality evaluation of compound systems is provided. The proposed software allows speeding up the solution of problems regarding the computation of the overall state of the object with the identification of risk factors using the considered method. The computer application with the user-friendly interface is made, which allows displaying results in an analytical form and in the form of graphs. This simplifies the perception of information regarding the research results obtained.

Author Biographies

Тетяна Володимирівна Козуля, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» 21 Bagaleia str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Professor, Doctor of technical sciences

Department of computer monitoring and logistic 

Наталья Валеріївна Шаронова, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» 21 Bagaleia str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Professor, Doctor of technical sciences, Head of department

Department of intelligent computer systems 

Марія Михайлівна Козуля, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» 21 Bagaleia str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Postgraduste student

Department of intelligent computer systems 

Ярослав Володимирович Святкін, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» 21 Bagaleia str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» 

References

  1. Zgurovs'kij, M. Z., Pankratova, N. D. (2007). Osnovi sistemnogo analіzu. Kyiv: Vidavnicha grupa BHV, 544.
  2. Nikolis, G., Prigozhin, I. (1979). Samoorganizacija v neravnovesnyh sistemah: Ot dissipativnyh struktur k uporjadochennosti cherez fluktuacii. Moscow: Mir, 512.
  3. Brilljujen, L. (1966). Nauchnaja neopredelennost' i informacija. Moscow: Mir, 272.
  4. Vjatkin, V. B. (2012). Sinergeticheskaja teorija informacii: pojasnenija i terminologicheskie zamechanija. Nauchnyj zhurnal KubGAU. 80 (06), 1–36. Available at: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2012/06/pdf/46.pdf
  5. Prigozhin, I. R. (2000). Konec neopredelennosti. Izhevsk..NIC, 208.
  6. Prigozhin, I. R., Stengers, I. (1986). Porjadok iz haosa. Moscow: Nauka, 432.
  7. Koval', A. V., Bojko, Ju. D., Zajceva, E. A. (2014). Model' scenarno-celevogo pohoda pri postroenii informacionno-analiticheskoj sistemy. Sistemnyj analiz i informacionnye tehnologi: materialy 16-j Mezhdu narod. n-t konf. SAIT-14. Kyiv: UNK «IPSA» NUTU «KPI», 105–106.
  8. Gorban', I. I. (2013). Jentropija neopredelennosti. Matematichnі mashini і sistemi, 2, 105–117.
  9. Vechіrs'ka, І. D., Shabanov-Kushnarenko, Ju. P. (2007). Pro doslіdzhennja vlastivostej lіnіjnih logіchnih peretvoren'. Sistemi obrobki іnformacіi. 8 (66), 130–133.
  10. Wang, X. (2007). Editorial: Environmental Informatics for Environmental Planning and Management. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 9 (1), 1–3. doi: 10.3808/jei.200700082
  11. Kumari, J. (2006). Entropy Change as Influenced by Anthropogenic Impact on a Boreal Land Cover – A Case Study. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 7 (2), 75–83. doi: 10.3808/jei.200600069
  12. Jung, J.-Y., Chin, C.-H., Cardoso, J. (2011). An entropy-based uncertainty measure of process models. Information Processing Letters, 111 (3), 135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ipl.2010.10.022
  13. Chundi, P., Zhang, R. (2006). Entropy Based Measure Functions for Analyzing Time Stamped Documents, Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Text Mining. Sixth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Hyatt Regency Bethesda, Bethesda, Maryland.
  14. Barabash, O. V., Savchenko, V. A., Sljunjaev, A. S. (2010). Pobudova nechіtkoi bazi znan' sistemi upravlіnnja skladnoju organіzacіjno-tehnіchnoju sistemoju. Aviacionno-kosmicheskaja tehnika i tehnologija, 2 (69), 79–82.
  15. Goljan, N. V., Shabanov-Kushnarenko, Ju. P. (2011). Algebro-logicheskie modeli konstrukcij nejavnogo vybora v biznes processah. Sistemi obrobki іnformacіi. 8 (98), 275–278.
  16. Judickij, S. A. (2001). Scenarno-celevoj podhod k sistemnomu analizu. Avtomatika i telemehanika. 4, 63–175.
  17. Kozulja, T. V. (2010). Procesi ekologіchnogo reguljuvannja. Koncepcіja korporativnoi ekologіchnoi sistemi: monografіja. Kharkіv: NTU «KhPI», 588.
  18. Sukachov, V. I. (2001). Osnovy sinergetiki. Kyiv: Obereg, 287.
  19. Haken, G. (1989). Sinergetika: ierarhii neustojchivostej v samoorganizujushhihsja sistemah i ustrojstvah. Moscow: Mir, 423.
  20. Nikolas, Dzh. (1989). Dinamika ierarhicheskih sistem: jevoljucionnoe predstavlenie. Moscow: Mir, 488.
  21. Kozulja, T. V., Sharonova, N. V. (2005). Sinergetika і prijnjattja upravlіns'kogo rіshennja v umovah funkcіonuvannja korporativnoi ekologіchnoi sistemi. Іnformacіjnі tehnologіi ta komp’juterna іnzhenerіja, 2, 31–36.
  22. Fedulov, A. A., Fedulov, Ju. G., Cygichko, V. N. (1979). Vvedenie v teoriju statisticheski nenadezhnyh reshenij. Moscow: Statistika, 279.
  23. Ovezgel'dyev, A. O., Petrov, Je. G., Petrov, K. Je. (2002). Sintez i identifikacija modelej mnogofaktornogo ocenivanija i optimizacii. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 163.
  24. Kozulja, T. V. (2015). Metodologіja ekologіchnogo monіtoringu ta upravlіnnja prirodno-tehnogennimi ob’ektami. Navchal'nij posіbnik. Kharkіv: NTU «KhPI», 288.
  25. Kozulja, T. V. (2014). Teoretiko-prakticheskie osnovy metodologii kompleksnoj ocenki jekologichnosti territorial'nyh i ob’ektovyh sistem. Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 298.
  26. Kolmagorov, A. N. (1987). Teorija informacii i teorija algoritmov. Moscow: Nauka, 304.
  27. Bodrov, V. I., Lazareva, T. Ja., Martem'janov, Ju. F. (2004). Matematicheskie metody prinjatija reshenij. Tambov: Izdatelstvo Tambovskogo gosudarstvenogo tehnicheskogo universiteta, 124.
  28. Arosen'ev, Ju. N., Shelobaev, S. I., Davydova, T. Ju. (2003). Prinjatie reshenij. Integrirovannye intellektual'nye sistemy. Moscow: JuNITI-DANA, 270.
  29. Larichev, O. I., Moshkovich, E. M. (1996). Kachestvennye metody prinjatija reshenij. Verbal'nyj analiz reshenij. Moscow: Nauka, Fizmatlit, 208.

Published

2016-02-28

How to Cite

Козуля, Т. В., Шаронова, Н. В., Козуля, М. М., & Святкін, Я. В. (2016). Knowledge-oriented database formation for determination of complex method for quality identification of compound systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(2(79), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.60590