System evaluation of engineering objects’ operating taking into account the margin of permissible risk

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71126

Keywords:

strategy, security, survivability, margin of permissible risk, abnormal situation, risk, uncertainty

Abstract

The result of this study is the technique for system evaluation of real CES operating taking into account the margin of permissible risk. The proposed technique is directed to timely detection and elimination of the causes for situations, connected with a possible transition of CES into an inoperable mode as a distinguishing feature. The time interval is determined to implement the coordinated margin of permissible risk, taking into account the integral informedness index and an unavoidable threshold time limit. This time interval may be used for guaranteed prevention of the specified abnormal mode in order to maintain the necessary indicators values of complex engineering system functioning in the normal mode. The proposed technique is implemented using a water supply system as an example, where the water level in the reservoir and the water pressure at the water inlet of a technological object are used as indicators; the values of these indicators characterize the state of the system at each time instance during its operation. The values for the coordinated margin of permissible risk are received in time instants, which can be used to implement the guaranteed prevention of an abnormal situation for one indicator and an emergency situation for another.

Author Biographies

Nataliya Pankratova, National technical university “Kyiv polytechnic institute” Peremogy ave., 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

Doctor of technical science, Professor, Deputy director

Educational-scientific complex “Institute for Applied System Analysis” 

Ljudmyla Kondratova, National Technical University “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Peremogy ave., 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

PhD, senior scientific employee

Educational-Scientific Complex “Institute for Applied System Analysis” 

References

  1. Pankratova, N. D. (2010). System strategy for guaranteed safety of complex engineering systems. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 46 (2), 243–251. doi: 10.1007/s10559-010-9201-6
  2. Kulik, A. S., Luchenko, O. A., Firsov, S. N. (2012). Algorithmic software of diagnose and serviceability of attitude and stabilization satellite system restoration modules. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 1, 112–122. doi: 10.15588/1607-3274-2012-1-22
  3. Fagarasan, I., Iliescu, S. St. (2008). Parity equations for fault detection and isolation. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, 99–103. doi: 10.1109/aqtr.2008.4588715
  4. Sidorov, V. А. (2010). The modern problems diagnosing the technical state of the mechanical equipment. Technical diagnostics and non-destructive testing, 3, 47–52. Available at: http://patonpublishinghouse.com/tdnk/pdf/2010/pdfarticles/03/8.pdf
  5. Pennacchi, P., Vania, A. (2008). Diagnostics of a crack in a load coupling of a gas turbine using the machine model and the analysis of the shaft vibrations. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 22 (5), 1157–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.10.005
  6. Lerner, U, Bayesian, R. P., Koller D., Biswas, G. (2000). Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems. Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-00), 531–537.
  7. Kotelnikov, V. G., Lepesh, G. V., Martyschenko, L. A. (2013). System analysis of quality and reliability of complex anthropogenic complexes. Technical and technological problems of service, 4 (26), 35–41.
  8. Semenov, S. S. (2013). The main provisions of the system analysis in the evaluation of the technical level of complex systems using expert method. Reliability and quality of the complex systems, 4, 45–53.
  9. Potekhin, A. I. (2010). Failure Safe Discrete Event Systems. Technical and software tools for control systems, control and measurement, 943‒958.
  10. Gubernatorov, V. P. (2012). Modification of the evolutionary-genetic algorithm for constructing optimal test sequences. Bulletin of the N. I. Lobachevsky Nizhny Novgorod University, 3, 179–183.
  11. Lanetsky, B. N., Lukyanchuk, V. V., Terebukha, I. N. (2011). Complex model to control the technical state and restore the efficiency of complex technical system with a multi-level structure. Systems of armament and military equipment, 4 (28), 73–75.
  12. Zgurovsky, M. Z., Pankratova, N. D. (2011). System analysis: problems, methodology, applications. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, 726.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-21

How to Cite

Pankratova, N., & Kondratova, L. (2016). System evaluation of engineering objects’ operating taking into account the margin of permissible risk. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(4(81), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71126

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Cybernetics - applied aspects