Development of parametric model of prediction and evaluation of the quality level of educational institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.80790Keywords:
educational institutions, quality assessment, proactive management, quality prediction, quality forecasting, parametrical modelAbstract
The purpose of the study was the development of a parametric model for prediction and actual evaluation of the quality level of work of educational institution.
We created the structure of the processes of educational institution, which includes 7 levels of processes in the sequence of their execution.
To determine parameters of influence of some processes on others, the links between each process and other processes were analyzed. With the help of expert assessment, we defined values of parameters of influence on each process. We performed selection of experts, for whom a statistical analysis of the results of expert evaluations demonstrated consistency in judgments at the medium and high level – 91 %, the significance of these assessments reached 78 % by the criterion of Pearson.
The defined values of parameters helped to create the model of the process of educational institution. This model allows calculating consistently by the levels of processes the quality of work of each process by the determined function that takes as its basis the level of quality of initial resources and uses the defined parameters and the structure of processes for the calculation. The calculated quality is predictable, demonstrating either increase or decrease in the quality level of each process and the entire educational institution in future.
The actual assessment of quality of each process of educational institution is recommended to perform based on verbal questionnaires, the basis of which is the developed table of ten degrees of estimation of quality level. The scale of degrees of assessment was expanded in comparison with the recommendations of the ISO 9004 standard to align actual evaluations with the process of prediction of quality level and consequent comparison of their results.
As a result of the study, we created a parametrical model which enables us to predict the quality of work of educational institution based on rational allocation of initial resources. Based on the model, it is possible to realistically evaluate the quality of work of all processes of educational institution for further improvement in their work and adjustment of the model for prediction.
References
Otradskaya, T., Gogunsky, V. (2016). Development process models for evaluation of performance of the educational establishments. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (3 (81)), 12–22. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.66562
Quality management systems – Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2000 in education (2000). Dergspogivstandart, 20.
Bushuyev, S. D., Bushuyev, D. A., Rogozina, V. B., Mikhieieva, O. V. (2015). Convergence of knowledge in project management. 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS), 496–500. doi: 10.1109/idaacs.2015.7341355
McAdam, R., Leonard, D., Henderson, J., Hazlett, S.-A. (2008). A grounded theory research approach to building and testing TQM theory in operations management. Omega, 36 (5), 825–837. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.04.005
ISO/DIS 29990:2010. Learning services for non‑formal education and training – Basic requirements for service providers (2009). ISO/TK 232, 15.
Kolesnikov, O. E. (2014). Formation of information the university environment for distance learning. Management of development of complex systems, 20, 21–26. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/urss/article/view/38392/34692
Gogunskii, V., Kolesnikov, O., Kolesnikova, K., Lukianov, D. (2016). Lifelong learning” is a new paradigm of personnel training in enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (2 (82)), 4–10. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.74905
Lizunov, P. P., Beloshchitsky, S. A., Beloshchitskaya, S. V. (2011). Design – vector control by higher education institutions. Management of development of complex systems, 6, 135–139. Available at: http://urss.knuba.edu.ua/files/zbirnyk-6/135–139.pdf
Killen, C. P., Jugdev, K., Drouin, N., Petit, Y. (2012). Advancing project and portfolio management research: Applying strategic management theories. International Journal of Project Management, 30 (5), 525–538. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.12.004
Akasah, Z. A., Alias, M. (2011). Analysis and development of the generic maintenance management process modeling for the preservation of heritage school buildings. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 1 (2), 43–51.
Aritzeta, A., Balluerka, N., Gorostiaga, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., Haranburu, M., Gartzia, L. (2016). Classroom emotional intelligence and its relationship with school performance. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 9 (1), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.11.001
Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Successful intelligence: A model for testing intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8 (2), 76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.09.004
Aburizaizah, S., Kim, Y., Fuller, B. (2016). Diverse schools and uneven principal leadership in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.007
Makarova, Y., Krisilov, V., Vu, H. N., Langmann, R. (2014). User profile creation and training mode determination in the “Smart lab” system. 2014 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 315–320. doi: 10.1109/educon.2014.6826110
Oborsky, G. O., Gogunsky, V. D., Saveleva, O. S. (2011). Standardization and certification processes of education quality management in higher education. Odes'kyi Politechnichnyi Universytet. Pratsi, 1 (35), 251–255. Available at: http://pratsi.opu.ua/articles/show/95
Todorović, M. L., Petrović, D. Č., Mihić, M. M., Obradović, V. L., Bushuyev, S. D. (2015). Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 33 (4), 772–783. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.009
Rach, V. A., Borseko-Miroshnichenko, A. Ju. (2006). System dynamics model as a basis for building a tool of monitoring the quality of educational projects. Project management and production development, 3 (19), 5–15. Available at: http://www.pmdp.org.ua/index.php/ru/?option=com_content&view=article&id=616
Toledo, C. M., Chiotti, O., Galli, M. R. (2016). Process-aware approach for managing organisational knowledge. Information Systems, 62, 1‑28. doi: 10.1016/j.is.2016.04.001
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK Guide). Fifth Edition (2013). USA, PMI Inc., 589.
Bubela, T., Mykyychuk, M., Hunkalo, A., Boyko, O., Basalkevych, O. (2016). A study of uncertainty of expert measurement results in the quality management system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (3 (81)), 4–11. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71607
Aivasyan, S. A., Buhshtaber, V. M., Enyukov, I. S., Meshalkin, L. D. (1989). Applied Statistics: Classification and reduction of dimension. Moscow: Finance and Statistics.
Sherstyuk, O., Olekh, T., Kolesnikova, K. (2016). The research on role differentiation as a method of forming the project team. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (3 (80)), 63–68. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.65681
Oborska, G. G., Gogunsky, V. D. (2005). The model of communication effects for advertising project management. Odes'kyi Politechnichnyi Universytet. Pratsi, 31–34.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Tatyana Otradskaya, Viktor Gogunskii, Svetlana Antoshchuk, Olexii Kolesnikov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
