Creating a qualimetric criterion for the generalized level of vehicle

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.92203

Keywords:

qualimetric criterion of the generalized level of vehicle, method of dimensionality analysis, bimodal transportation

Abstract

A comprehensive qualimetric criterion for determining the generalized level of a vehicle, which was obtained by the method of dimensionality analysis, was proposed. It was determined that the components of this criterion are controversial, so when choosing a technology for cargo transportation, it is necessary to consider the importance of one or another component of the criterion at a specific moment of time when making a decision.

Optimal quantity, coverage range and load-carrying capacity are assessed based on the characteristics of vehicles. The integrated qualimetric level of a vehicle is determined, taking into account the level of reduction in unproductive time cost and costs of maintaining a vehicle over its lifecycle and its level of competitiveness.

The proposed qualimetric criterion has a major advantage over the existing ones; it has a systemic character, takes into account a complexity of indicators of the level of vehicle, which have an impact on the transportation effectiveness. The proposed qualimetric criteria may be used both to increase efficiency of interaction between automobile and railway transport and for other types of transport because of its integrated nature and due to the fact that graphic dependences provide significant possibilities for visualization.

The procedure of integrated assessment of vehicle was implemented in the form of nomographs, which comprehensively evaluate characteristics of vehicles for various transportation options. For the railway transportation, we obtained Z=1215∙1012 tran; for the bimodal transportation, Z=6075∙1012 tran; and for the road transportation, Z=506.25∙1012 tran, which demonstrates the prospects for cargo transportation by bimodal transport.

Author Biographies

Sergii Panchenko, Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport Feierbakha sq., 7, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61050

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Rector

Department of automation and computer remote control train traffic 

Оleksandеr Lavrukhin, Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport Feierbakha sq., 7, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61050

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of manage freight and commercial work

Olga Shapatina, Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport Feierbakha sq., 7, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61050

Assistant

Department of manage freight and commercial work

References

  1. Avdeev, S. (2014). Kombinirovannyj transport-real'nost' zavtrashnego dnja? Ukrai'ns'ki zaliznyci, 1 (7), 30–32.
  2. Islam, D. M. Z. (2014). Barriers to and enablers for European rail freight transport for integrated door-to-door logistics service. Part 1: Barriers to multimodal rail freight transport. Transport Problems, 9 (3), 43–56.
  3. Islam, D. M. Z. (2014). Barriers to and enablers for European rail freight transport for integrated door-to-door logistics service. Part 2: Enablers for multimodal rail freight transport. Transport Problems, 9 (4), 5–13.
  4. SteadieSeifi, M., Dellaert, N. P., Nuijten, W., Van Woensel, T., Raoufi, R. (2014). Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 233 (1), 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.055
  5. Nossack, J. (2013). Operational planning problems in international freight transportation. Berlin: Peter Lang Intl. Academic Publishers, 136. doi: 10.3726/978-3-653-02787-7
  6. Golubenko, A., Gubacheva, L., Andreev, A. (2012). Forming the intermodal system of freight transportation on the east of Ukraine. Transport Problems, 7 (2), 27–35.
  7. Hanssen, T.-E. S., Mathisen, T. A., Jorgensen, F. (2012). Generalized Transport Costs in Intermodal Freight Transport. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 189–200. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.738
  8. Kozachenko, D. M., Rustamov, R. Sh., Matvijenko, H. V. (2013). Naprjamky pidvyshhennja efektyvnosti perevezen' zernovyh vantazhiv zaliznychnym transportom. Transportni systemy ta tehnologii' perevezen'. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' DNUZT im. akad. V. Lazarjana, 6, 56–60.
  9. Korobjova, R. G., Rustamov, R. Sh., Grevcov, S. V. (2015). Vnedrenie bimodal'nyh tehnologij perevozki zernovyh gruzov v Ukraine. Transportni systemy ta tehnologii' perevezen'. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' DNUZT im. akad. V. Lazarjana, 9, 29–34.
  10. Hao, C., Yue, Y. (2016). Optimization on Combination of Transport Routes and Modes on Dynamic Programming for a Container Multimodal Transport System. Procedia Engineering, 137, 382–390. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.272
  11. Smehov, A. A. (1995). Osnovy transportnoj logistiki. Moscow: Transport, 197.
  12. Grebenikov, A. G., Mjalica, A. K., Frolov, V. Ja. et. al. (1998). Kachestvo i sertifikacija promyshlennoj produkcii. Kharkiv: KhAI, 396.
  13. Andrianov, Ju. M., Lopatin, M. V. (1983). Kvalimetricheskie aspekty upravlenija kachestvom novoj tehniki. Leningrad: LGU, 288.
  14. Binkin, B. A., Chernjak, V. I. (1982). Jeffektivnost' upravlenija: nauka i praktika. Moscow: Nauka, 144.
  15. Deshkovskij, A., Kojfman, Ju. (2002). Metod razmernostej v reshenii zadach. FPV, 2, 71–81.
  16. Hantli, G. (1970). Analiz razmernostej. Moscow: Mir, 175.
  17. Shapatina, O. O. (2013). Vyznachennja sfery efektyvnosti bimodal'nyh perevezen'. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' Ukrai'ns'koi' derzhavnoi' akademii' zaliznychnogo transportu, 137, 135–141.
  18. Kotenko, A. M., Krasheninin, O. S., Shapatina, O. O. (2015). Justification of the choice type of cargo transportation. ScienceRise, 1 (2 (6)), 25–29. doi: 10.15587/2313-8416.2015.35904
  19. Tereshina, N. P., Shabanov, A. V., Ryshkov, A. V. (2005). Upravlenie konkurentosposobnost'ju zheleznodorozhnyh perevozok. Moscow: VINITI RAN, 240.
  20. Shapatina, O. O. (2013). Ocinka rivnja konkurentospromozhnosti intermodal'nyh perevezen' vantazhiv. Informacijno-kerujuchi systemy na zaliznychnomu transporti, 1, 41–46.
  21. Puzankov, A. D., Chetvergov ,V. A.; Chetvergov, V. A. (Ed.) (2003). Nadezhnost' lokomotivov. Moscow: Izd-vo «Marshrut», 415.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-27

How to Cite

Panchenko, S., Lavrukhin О., & Shapatina, O. (2017). Creating a qualimetric criterion for the generalized level of vehicle. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3 (85), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.92203

Issue

Section

Control processes

Most read articles by the same author(s)