Development of the tensor model of multipath qоe-routing in an infocommunication network with providing the required quality rating

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.141989

Keywords:

infocommunication network, quality of experience in an infocommunication service, average end-to-end delay, probability of packet losses, tensor, routing, quality rating

Abstract

This work has solved a relevant task to ensure the required level of quality of experience in an infocommunication network, which implied the development of a mathematical model of the multipath QoE-routing while maintaining the required quality rating. In this case, quality rating calculation requires the introduction to the mathematical model of routing of additional conditions for obtaining the indicators of an end-to-end delay and a packet loss probability. To this end, it is advisable to use the tensor formalization of these conditions when implementing a multipath routing strategy. Such a technique for expanding the mathematical models (introduction of additional analytical conditions) is more flexible and would full account for the complexity of relationship between network parameters within QoE. Given this, the quality of experience of speech transmission is not defined by the absolute values of delays and loss probabilities, but rather by their relationship. The result of studying the proposed model is the calculated quantitative indicator for a quality rating, which, compared to recommended indicators according to existing recommendations, makes it possible to evaluate the execution of the predefined level of QoE. In other words, given the preset intensity of traffic in a network, we calculated indicators for the average end-to-end delay and a packet loss probability, which make it possible to assess the quality of experience in terms of a quality rating and indicate the efficiency of the proposed solution. And, on the contrary, owing to the developed model of QoE-routing, it has become possible to control the probability of losses and the average end-to-end packet delay in an infocommunication network in order to ensure meeting the specified QoE-requirements. In addition, a comparative analysis was performed of a flow model of multipath routing based on using the IGRP metric, which made it possible to assess the effectiveness of the proposed solution and demonstrated better performance in terms of a quality rating by 12 to 25 % depending on the source data.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Lemeshko, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics Nauky ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

Doctor of Technical Sciences

Department of Infocommunication engineering

Maryna Yevdokymenko, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics Nauky ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD

Department of Infocommunication engineering

Naors Y. Anad Alsaleem, University of AL-Hamdaniya Ninavah, 79CF+PV, Bakhdida, Hamdaniya, Iraq

PhD

Department of Computer science

References

  1. ITU-T P.830: Subjective performance assessment of telephone-band and wideband digital codecs (1996). ITU.
  2. ITU-T P.863. Perceptual objective listening quality assessment (2014). ITU.
  3. ITU-T P.911. Subjective audiovisual quality assessment methods for multimedia applications (1998). ITU.
  4. ITU-T P.862. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ): An objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrow-band telephone networks and speech codecs (2001). ITU.
  5. ITU-T P.910. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia application (2008). ITU.
  6. ITU-T P.806. A subjective quality test methodology using multiple rating scales (2014). ITU.
  7. ITU-T G.1011. Reference guide to quality of experience assessment methodologies (2015). ITU.
  8. ITU-R BT.500. Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures (2011). ITU.
  9. Bentaleb, A., Begen, A. C., Zimmermann, R. (2016). SDNDASH: Improving QoE of HTTP Adaptive Streaming Using Software Defined Networking. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference – MM '16, 1296–1305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2964284.2964332
  10. Calvigioni, G., Aparicio-Pardo, R., Sassatelli, L., Leguay, J., Medagliani, P., Paris, S. (2018). Quality of Experience-based Routing of Video Traffic for Overlay and ISP Networks. IEEE INFOCOM 2018 – IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, 935–943.
  11. Schatz, R., Hoßfeld, T., Janowski, L., Egger, S. (2013). From Packets to People: Quality of Experience as a New Measurement Challenge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 219–263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36784-7_10
  12. Mellouk, A., Hoceini, S., Tran, H. A. (2013). Quality of Experience for Multimedia: Application to Content Delivery Network Architecture. John Wiley & Sons. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118649367
  13. Lemeshko, O. V., Yeremenko, O. S. (2016). Dynamics analysis of multipath QoS-routing tensor model with support of different flows classes. 2016 International Conference on Smart Systems and Technologies (SST). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/sst.2016.7765664
  14. ITU-T G.109. Amendment 1 New Appendix I – The E-model-based quality loops for predicting speech transmission quality and user satisfaction from time-varying transmission impairments (2007). ITU.
  15. ITU-T Y.1540. Internet protocol data communication service – IP packet transfer and availability performance parameters (2016). ITU.
  16. ITU-T G.107. The E-model: A computational model for use in transmission n planning (2014). ITU.
  17. Janevski, T., Jankovic, M., Markus, S. (2017). Quality of service regulation manual. Telecommunication development Bureau, 173.
  18. Lemeshko, A. V., Evseeva, O. Y., Garkusha, S. V. (2014). Research on Tensor Model of Multipath Routing in Telecommunication Network With Support of Service Quality by Greate Number of Indices. Telecommunications and Radio Engineering, 73 (15), 1339–1360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1615/telecomradeng.v73.i15.30
  19. Lemeshko, O., Yeremenko, O. (2016). Dynamic presentation of tensor model for multipath QoS-routing. 2016 13th International Conference on Modern Problems of Radio Engineering, Telecommunications and Computer Science (TCSET). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcset.2016.7452128
  20. Lemeshko, O., Yevsieieva, O., Yevdokymenko, M. (2018). Tensor flow-based model of quality of experience routing. 2018 14th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelecrtronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering (TCSET). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcset.2018.8336364
  21. Kron, G. (1949). Tensor Analysis of Networks. John Wiley and Sons, 635.
  22. Riedl, A., Schupke, D. A. (2007). Routing Optimization in IP Networks Utilizing Additive and Concave Link Metrics. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 15 (5), 1136–1148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tnet.2007.902546
  23. Lemeshko, O., Yeremenko, O. (2018). Linear optimization model of MPLS Traffic Engineering Fast ReRoute for link, node, and bandwidth protection. 2018 14th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelecrtronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering (TCSET). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcset.2018.8336365

Downloads

Published

2018-09-12

How to Cite

Lemeshko, O., Yevdokymenko, M., & Anad Alsaleem, N. Y. (2018). Development of the tensor model of multipath qоe-routing in an infocommunication network with providing the required quality rating. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(2 (95), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.141989

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (95) (2018): Information technology. Industry control systems

Section

Information technology

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Oleksandr Lemeshko, Maryna Yevdokymenko, Naors Y. Anad Alsaleem

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.