Concept of project selection and its formalization in the absence of complete information

Authors

  • Sergey Rudenko Odessa National Maritime University 34 Mechnikov str., Odessa, Ukraine, 65011, Ukraine
  • Vera Andrievska Odessa National Maritime University Str. Mechnikov, 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65011, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-1521

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.65618

Keywords:

project map, criteria, conceptual model, selection, possibility theory

Abstract

The basic object of the proposed approach is the “project map”, which is a set of project characteristics that are important for decision-making on the project selection in a particular situation. The “project map” is formed of the following blocks of project characteristics: enterprise objectives, cost-effectiveness, resources, risks, project potential, value, time. Each block contains a list of characteristics, typical examples of which are presented in the paper and can be extended. In particular, integrated project estimates, developed by modern researchers are shown in the “value” block.

The conceptual model of the “project map – criteria – restrictions” system, which can serve as a universal basis for the formalization of the decision-making processes on the project selection under various conditions of information provision, taking into account possible modules of project characteristics is developed. Under this concept, the “project map” structure is reflected in the sets of restrictions and criteria for the selection procedure. This approach is versatile and allows forming the basis for subsequent selection considering project specifics and requirements.

According to this model, the project selection procedure is formalized based on the possibility theory. The proposed approach involves “filtering” of projects using the confidence levels specified for the considered conditions, which reduces the volume of the operated information at subsequent stages. Also, in the framework of a unified scheme, the options of the project selection by one or more criteria are coordinated.

Author Biographies

Sergey Rudenko, Odessa National Maritime University 34 Mechnikov str., Odessa, Ukraine, 65011

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Rector

Vera Andrievska, Odessa National Maritime University Str. Mechnikov, 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65011

Senior Lecturer

Department "System analysis and logistics"

References

  1. Bushuev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S., Jaroshenko, R. F. (2012). Model' garmonizacii cennostej programm razvitija organizacij v uslovijah turbulentnosti okruzhenija. Upravlіnnja rozvitkom skladnih sistem, 10, 9–13.
  2. Matveev, A. A., Novikov, D. A., Cvetkov, A. V. (2005). Modeli i metoly upravlenija portfeljami proektov. Moscow: PMSOFT, 206.
  3. Romanenko, N. V., Rudenko, S. V., Shahov, A. V. (2010). Opredelenie cennosti proektov vzdravoohranenii. Vestnik ONMU, 29, 73–84.
  4. Onishhenko, S. P., Arabadzhi, E. S. (2011). Formation of the optimal enterprise development program. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6/3 (54), 60–66. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/2251/2055
  5. Koljada, O. P. (2010). Metod formuvannja strategichnogo portfelju proektiv vyshhogo navchal'nogo zakladu. Upravlinnja proektamy ta Rozvytok vyrobnyctva, 1 (33), 161–172.
  6. Kuchyns'kyj, V. A., Korobka, N. A. (2011). Pidvyshhennja efektyvnosti innovacijnoi' dijal'nosti na osnovi udoskonalennja pidhodu do ocinky ta vidboru innovacijnyh proektiv. "Vestnyk NTU "HPY": Tehnichnyj progres ta efektyvnist' vyrobnyctva, 7, 112–117.
  7. Kononenko, Y. V., Bukreeva, K. S. (2010). Model and optimization method of projects portfolios of the enterprise for the planning period. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1/2 (43), 9–11. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/2495/2309
  8. Kononenko, I. V., Bukreeva, K. S. (2011). Metod formirovanija portfelja proektov predprijatija dlja planovogo perioda pri nechetkih ishodnyh dannyh. Upravlіnnja rozvitkom skladnih sistem, 7, 39–43.
  9. Prihno, Ju. E. (2015). Koncepcija formirovanija mul'tiproekta razvitija predprijatija na baze portfelja proektov. Upravlіnnja rozvitkom skladnih sistem, 21, 64–66.
  10. Benaija, K., Kjiri L. Project portfolio selection: Multi-criteria analysis and interactions between projects. Available at: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1503/1503.05366.pdf
  11. Almeida, A. T. de, Duarte, M. D. O. (2011). A multi-criteria decision model for selecting project portfolio with consideration being given to a new concept for synergies. Pesquisa Operacional, 31 (2), 301–318. doi: 10.1590/s0101-74382011000200006
  12. Meredith, J. R., Mantel, Jr. S. J. (2003). Project Management, 5th ed. New York: Wiley, 336.
  13. Pinto, J. K. (2010). Project Management: Achieving Competitive Advantage. Second Edition. Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc, 490.
  14. Bočková, K. H., Sláviková, G., Gabrhel, J. (2015). Game Theory as a Tool of Project Management. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 709–715. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.491
  15. Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1 (1), 3–28. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5
  16. An'shin, V. M., Demkin, I. V., Nikonov, I. M., Car'kov, I. N. (2007). Modeli upravlenija portfelem proektov v uslovijah neopredelennosti. Moscow: MATI, 117.
  17. Vanjushkin, A. S. (2012). Novaja struktura kartochki riska dlja monitoringa izmenenija verojatnostej riskovyh sobytij proekta. Upravlіnnja rozvitkom skladnih sistem, 9, 19–25.
  18. Pavlovskaja, L. A., Andrievskaja, V. A. (2014). Assessment of project potential of stevedoring company. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4/3 (70), 49–54. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.26584
  19. Molokanova, V. M. (2012). Ocinjuvannja jakisnyh pokaznykiv portfelja proektiv za dopomogoju teorii' nechitkyh mnozhyn. Upravlinnja proektamy ta rozvytok vyrobnyctva, 3 (43), 106–114.
  20. Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95 (3), 649–655. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2

Downloads

Published

2016-04-24

How to Cite

Rudenko, S., & Andrievska, V. (2016). Concept of project selection and its formalization in the absence of complete information. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(3(80), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.65618

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3(80) (2016): Control processes

Section

Control processes

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Vera Andrievska, Sergey Rudenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.