Development of system operations models hierarchy on the aggregating sign of system mechanisms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71494Keywords:
classification of mechanisms, classification of products, operation, operation model, efficiency of use of resourcesAbstract
Now there is a terminological uncertainty concerning such basic cybernetic categories as the mechanism, a product, operation. Such uncertainty, on the one hand, is caused by the fact that these categories, essentially, are interconnected. On the other hand, the object of research has to be defined by the class of solvable task.
As the concept “operation” is an abstraction of the highest level, it is necessary to establish compliance between the area of research and the type of operation. That is, there is a need for the decrease of the degree of abstraction, however, the power of the set connected with the concept “operation” has to be reasonable.
In the work, compliance between a hierarchical representation of the system mechanism structure which degree of hierarchy is expressed as the aggregating sign, and the power of the registration model of the system operation is established.
Identification of operations on the aggregating sign of system mechanisms allows to expand the conceptual cybernetic framework and to systematize problems which are solved in the course of operations research.
It is found that the cybernetic operation is the result of the interaction of system products and system mechanisms directed to transformation of input products of the operation to output products of the operation.
Definition of the cybernetic operation model as forms of data presentation displaying results of procedural interaction of system products and system mechanisms is given.
It is noted that a distinctive feature of the cybernetic operation is a limitation of its duration in time.
Definition of the operation and the operation model allows determining the area of developments connected with the statement and the solution of problems in operations research.
It is found that the registration model of any sets operation can be presented in the form of two functions comparable to each other: input and output functions.
Definition of input and output functions is a necessary and sufficient condition for unambiguous identification of the studied operation concerning its efficiency.
References
- Lutsenko, I., Fomovskaya, E. (2015). Identification of target system operations. The practice of determining the optimal control. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (2(78)), 30–36. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.54432
- Gegel, G. V. F. (1974). Entsiklopediya filosofskih nauk. Vol. 1. Nauka logiki. Moscow: Myisl, 452.
- Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar (1983). Moscow: Sov. Entsikl., 840.
- Averina, I. S. (2012). Evolyutsiya i klassifikatsiya fenomena «hozyaystvennyiy mehanizm». Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2, 12–16.
- Andrianova, N. A., Andrianov, R. O. (2015). Innovatsiya: izobretenie ili novshestvo neodnoznachnost terminologii. Ekonomicheskie i sotsialno–gumanitarnyie issledovaniya, 1 (5), 45–52.
- Astahova, T. S., Beloozerov, V. N., Surikova, N. G., Dmitrieva, E. Yu. (2013). Elektronnoe izdanie universalnoy desyatichnoy klassifikatsii. Problemyi i resheniya, 3 (15), 24–29.
- Babich, N. S., Batyikov, I. V. (2012). Faktoryi ottoka klientov: podhod, osnovannyiy na klassifikatsii produktov. Sovremennyie tendentsii v ekonomike i upravlenii: novyiy vzglyad, 16, 43–47.
- Knyazkov, A. S. (2012). Problemyi klassifikatsii takticheskih operatsiy. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3, 185–192.
- Onuchin, A. P. (1986). Voprosyi situativnoy metodiki i takticheskih operatsiy pri rassledovanii prestupleniy. Takticheskie operatsii i effektivnost rassledovaniya, 22–34.
- Semenyuk, A. A. (2012). Slozhnyie voprosyi otneseniya rashodov na stati klassifikatsii operatsiy sektora gosudarstvennogo upravleniya. Buhgalterskiy uchot v byudzhetnyih i nekommercheskih organizatsiyah, 18, 41–46.
- Savinova, V. A., Krasnov, S. V. (2014). Klyuchevyie osobennosti operatsiy REPO i ih klassifikatsiya (teoreticheskiy i uchebno–metodicheskiy aspekt). Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2 (2-4), 833–836.
- Gasheva, E. V. (2014). Suschnost i osobennosti eksportnyih operatsiy kak ob'ekta nablyudeniya ucheta. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsialno–ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 4 (53), 107–111.
- Lutsenko, I. A., Nikolaenko, N. I. (2011). Synthesis of change authority to regulate development environment controlled systems EFFLY. Technology audit and production reserves, 2 (2 (2)), 44–48. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/4861/4512
- Lutsenko, I. (2014). Identification of target system operations. Determination of the time of the actual completion of the target operation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (2 (72)), 42–47. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28040
- Lutsenko, I. (2015). Identification of target system operations. development of global efficiency criterion of target operations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (2 (74)), 35–40. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.38963
- Lutsenko, I., Vihrova, E., Fomovskaya, E., Serdiuk, O. (2016). Development of the method for testing of efficiency criterion of models of simple target operations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (4 (80)), 42–50. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.66307
- Agrawal, S., Subramanian, K. R., Kapoor, S. (2010). Operations research – contemporary role in managerial decision making. Ijrras, 3 (2), 200–208.
- Kulej, M. (2011). Operations research. Business Information Systems, 70.
- Sottinen, T. (2009). Operations Research with GNU Linear Programming Kit Tommi Sottinen. ORMS 1020, 200.
- Zenkevich, N. A., Gubar, E. A. (2007). Praktikum po issledovaniyu operatsiy. Sankt-Peterburg, 170.
- Hemdi, A. T. (2007). Vvedenie v issledovanie operatsiy. Vilyams, 912.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Elena Fomovskaya, Igor Lutsenko, Elena Vikhrova, Olga Serdiuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.
