Evaluation to determine the efficiency for the diagnosis search formation method of failures in automated systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.108454

Keywords:

expert diagnostic system, failure diagnostics, data organization structure, estimation of algorithm execution time

Abstract

This paper describes the results of work in the field of failure self-diagnostics for automated systems in real time to increase the efficiency of their operation. We describe the method developed of a diagnosis search formation space by applying to the Expert System Knowledge Base to diagnose failures in automated systems. The input data for the Expert Diagnostic System is a conflicting set of diagnostic codes generated by the automated system over the time interval ∆t during its operation. We proposed mathematical methods to work with a data structure “m-tuples based on ordinary sets of arbitrary cardinality n” to process the input data. We conducted a comparative analysis to estimate the execution time of algorithms for the diagnosis search formation space using sequential access to the Boolean of input data and using the method developed. The analysis showed that the application of the proposed method changes the functional dependency of the execution time estimation of the algorithm in accordance with the number of its input data n from exponential to cubic. The application of the method developed allows us to minimize the time needed to establish the diagnosis to real time. The method presented to diagnose automated systems allows creating methods and algorithms for automatic self-recovery of their operability after reversible failures in real time

Author Biographies

Olena Syrotkina, National Mining University Dmytra Yavornytskoho ave., 19, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49600

Assistant

Department of Software Engineering 

Mykhailo Alekseyev, National Mining University Dmytra Yavornytskoho ave., 19, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49600

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Software Engineering 

Oleksii Aleksieiev, National Mining University Dmytra Yavornytskoho ave., 19, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49600

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of System Analysis and Management

References

  1. Ponomarev, O. P. (2006). Naladka i ekspluatatsiya sredstv avtomatizatsyi. SCADA-sistemy. Promyshlennye shiny i interfeysy. Obshchie svedeniya o programmiruemyh logicheskih kontrollerah i odnoplatnyh komp'yuterah. Kaliningrad: Izd-vo in-ta «KVSHU», 80.
  2. Shopin, A. G., Zanin, I. V. (2012). Evolyutsiya SCADA i informatsionnyh sistem proizvodstva. Avtomatizatsiya v promyshlennosti, 1, 18–21.
  3. Berry, B. (2011). SCADA Tutorial: A Fast Introduction to SCADA Fundamentals and Implementation. DPS Telecom, USA, 12.
  4. Goryainov, A. N. (2012). Opredelenie effektivnosti sistem diagnostirovaniya v teorii transportnoy diagnostiki. Vestnik NTU «KhPI», 1, 64–70.
  5. Charbonnier, S., Bouchair, N., Gayet, P. (2014). Analysis of fault diagnosability from SCADA alarms signatures using relevance indices. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). doi: 10.1109/smc.2014.6974342
  6. Munoz, M., de la Parra, I., Garcia, M., Marcos, J., Perez, M. (2015). A tool for the performance evaluation and failure detection of Amareleja PV plant (ACCIONA) from SCADA. 2015 17th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE’15 ECCE-Europe). doi: 10.1109/epe.2015.7311722
  7. Wang, X., Wu, K., Xu, Y. (2014). Research on Transformer Fault Diagnosis based on Multi-source Information Fusion. International Journal of Control and Automation, 7 (2), 197–208. doi: 10.14257/ijca.2014.7.2.19
  8. Wang, K.-S., Sharma, V. S., Zhang, Z.-Y. (2014). SCADA data based condition monitoring of wind turbines. Advances in Manufacturing, 2 (1), 61–69. doi: 10.1007/s40436-014-0067-0
  9. Windmann, S., Niggemann, O. (2015). Efficient fault detection for industrial automation processes with observable process variables. 2015 IEEE 13th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). doi: 10.1109/indin.2015.7281721
  10. MacGregor, J., Cinar, A. (2012). Monitoring, fault diagnosis, fault-tolerant control and optimization: Data driven methods. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 47, 111–120. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.017
  11. Dzhekson, P. (2001). Vvedenie v ekspertnye sistemy. Moscow: Vil'yams, 624.
  12. Sirotkina, E. I., Alekseev, M. A. (2013). Formirovanie ob'ektno-klassifikatsionnoy modeli diagnostiki raboty SCADA sistemy. Problemy nedropol'zovaniya. Sankt-Peterburg, 256–258.
  13. Syrotkina, O. (2015). Formation of the classification space of the expert system knowledge base for SCADA failure diagnostics. Power Engineering, Control and Information Technologies in Geotechnical Systems, 179–184. doi: 10.1201/b18475-25
  14. Ponomarev, V. F. (2005). Matematicheskaya logika. Kaliningrad: izd-vo KGTU, 201.
  15. Syrotkina, O. (2015). The application of specialized data structures for SCADA diagnostics. Sistemnye tekhnologyi, 4, 72–81.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-30

How to Cite

Syrotkina, O., Alekseyev, M., & Aleksieiev, O. (2017). Evaluation to determine the efficiency for the diagnosis search formation method of failures in automated systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(9 (88), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.108454

Issue

Section

Information and controlling system