Antisurge management of gas pumping units using polyvalent controllers

Authors

  • Георгій Никифорович Семенцов Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Karpatska 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8976-4557
  • Андрій Іванович Лагойда Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Karpatska 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-7786

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.26260

Keywords:

centrifugal supercharger, controller, setting, transfer function, performance, simulation, surge, management

Abstract

Based on the experimental data, the study of charts of change in productivity of centrifugal supercharger and change in gas pressure ratio, based on which the transfer function of the centrifugal supercharger of gas pumping unit was derived was conducted in the paper.

The method of determining the settings of PID and PIDD2 controller through the parameters of the object transfer function is given. Based on the calculated values, simulation of the process with PID, PIDD2, PIDD2D3, PDD2, PDPD controllers was performed in the Matlab software product, and their optimal settings were determined.

During the study of the system using polyvalent controllers it was found that the system performance will increase at: PIDD2 controller by 4.44%, PIDD2D3 controller by 22.67%, PDD2 controller by 89.33%, and PDPD controller by 98.22% compared to PID controller.

Author Biographies

Георгій Никифорович Семенцов, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Karpatska 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019

Professor

Department of process automation and monitoring environmental

Андрій Іванович Лагойда, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Karpatska 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019

Graduate student

Department of process automation and monitoring environmental

References

  1. Technological requirements for antypompazhnoho regulation centrifugal supercharger compressor units (1999). Ukrtransgas, 399, 9.
  2. Sementsov, G., Hirnyk, S., Blyaut, J. (2010). Surge control system of centrifugal compressor station. Oil and Gas energy, 2 (13), 44–53.
  3. Kozakiewicz, V. (1974) Self-oscillations (surge) in the compressors, 264.
  4. Izmailov, R., Seleznev, K. (1995). Non-stationary processes in centrifugal compressors, 11, 20–24.
  5. Mamonov, O., Targonsky, V. (2006). Introduction of energy saving technologies in the anti-surge control blowers, 1 (37), 6–7.
  6. Pismensky, I. (1987). Multi-frequency nonlinear oscillations in a gas turbine engine, 128.
  7. Rotach, V. (2004). Automatic Control Theory, 358.
  8. Rotach, V. (1993). Calculating settings real PID controller. Thermal Engineering, 10, 31–35.
  9. Kronikovskyy, D., Ladanyuk, А. (2009). The use of multi controllers for complex technological objects. Food Industry, 8, 104–109.
  10. Smirnov, N., Sabanin, V., Repin, A. (2005). Optimization of single-ACP with multivariable controllers. Industrial process control and controllers, 7, 71–77.
  11. Smirnov, N., Sabanin, V., Repin, A. (2006). Robust multivariable controllers for objects with transport delay. Industrial process control and controllers, 7, 82–86.
  12. Lagoyda, А., Blyaut, J., Lesiv, E., Sementsov, G. (2012). Analysis of the dynamic properties of a centrifugal supercharger compressor turbine drive as control object. Oil and Gas energy, 2 (18), 72–85.
  13. Lagoyda, А., Sementsov, G. (2013). A method for increasing the speed of the automatic surge control pumping unit. Collection of scientific papers SWorld, 9, 35–45.

Published

2014-07-24

How to Cite

Семенцов, Г. Н., & Лагойда, А. І. (2014). Antisurge management of gas pumping units using polyvalent controllers. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(8(70), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.26260

Issue

Section

Energy-saving technologies and equipment