Infuencing processed composite material priperties on acoustic emission

Authors

  • Сергей Федорович Филоненко National Aviation University Komarova 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.40191

Keywords:

acoustic emission, composite material, signal, amplitude, tooling, area of fracture/fracture area

Abstract

It is quite difficult to prove the informativeness of the parameters for acoustic emission during control, diagnostics and monitoring the technology of composite materials tooling as well as the parameters optimization. We have considered the resulting acoustic emission signals at tooling the composite material for a mechanical model of destroying its surface layer. We have studied the impact of a parameter determined by the properties of the destroyed surface layer of composite material on amplitude characteristics of the acoustic emission. We have proved that the influencing parameter does not alter the nature of the formed acoustic radiation. The resulting acoustic emission signals are continuous but very ragged. A rising influencing parameter leads to falling amplitude characteristics of the resulting acoustic emission signals––with an average amplitude rate, its standard deviation, and dispersion. At a general decrease of the amplitude parameters of acoustic emission, the rising influencing parameter mostly affects dispersion of the average resulting signal amplitude. The obtained results show that optimization of parameters for the technology of composite materials tooling (where composite materials have various physical and mechanical characteristics) as well as devising methods of control, diagnostics and monitoring of such processes as an informative parameter requires to analyze the alteration patterns of dispersion of the average resulting signal amplitude.

Author Biography

Сергей Федорович Филоненко, National Aviation University Komarova 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680

Professor, director

Institute of Information-Diagnostic Systems

References

  1. Teti, R, Jemielniak, K, O’Donnell, G, Dornfeld, D. (2010). Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 59 (2), 717–739. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.010
  2. Neslušan, M., Šipek, M., Mrazik, J. (2012). Analysis of chip formation during hard turning through acoustic emission. Materials Engineering, 19, 1–11.
  3. Lee, D. E, Hwang, I, Valente, C. M. O., Oliveira, J. F. G., Dornfeld, D. A. (2006). Precision manufacturing process monitoring with acoustic emission. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 46 (2), 176–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.04.001
  4. Kopač, J, Sali, S. (2006). Acoustic emission in drilling carbon steel and nodular gray iron. J. of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 19 (1), 91–95.
  5. Mukhopadhyay, C. K., Jayakumar, T., Raj, B., Venugopal, S. (2012). Statistical analysis of acoustic emission signals generated during turning of a metal matrix composite. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 34 (2), 145–154. doi: 10.1590/s1678-58782012000200006
  6. Bhuiyann, M. S. H., Choudhury, I. A., Nukman, Y. (2012). An innovative approach to monitor the chip formation effect on tool state using acoustic emission in turning. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 58, 19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.02.001
  7. Qin, F., Hu, J., Chou, Y. K., Thompson, R. G. (2009). Delamination wear of nano-diamond coated cutting tools in composite machining. Wear, 267 (5-8), 991–995. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.12.065
  8. Sudha, A. J., Sampathkumar, B. S., Vijaya, C. A. (2009). AE waveform analysis of delamination in GFRP composite materials during drilling. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1 (1), 63–66. doi: 10.7763/ijet.2009.v1.11
  9. Thepsonthi, T. (2014). Modeling and optimization of micro-end milling process for micro-manufacturing. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 246.
  10. Teti, R., Dornfeld, D. A. (1989). Modeling and experimental analysis of acoustic emission from metal cutting. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 111 (3), 229–237. doi: 10.1115/1.3188754
  11. Liu, J. J., Dornfeld, D. A. (1996). Modeling and analysis of acoustic emission in diamond turning. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 118 (2), 199–207. doi: 10.1115/1.2831012
  12. Keraita, J. N., Oyango, H. J., Misoi, G. K. (2001). Lathe stability charts via acoustic emission monitoring. African Journal of Science and Technology. Science and Engineering Series, 2 (2), 81–93. doi: 10.4314/ajst.v2i2.44675
  13. Filonenko, S. F., Nimchenko, T. V. (2011). Acoustic emission at machining work of materials cutting. Technological systems, 3 (56), 50–56.
  14. Filonenko, S. F., Nimchenko, T. V., Kositskaya, T. N. (2011). Acoustic emission at alteration of processing speed of materials cutting. Technological systems, 4 (57), 80–88.
  15. Filonenko, S. (2015). Acoustic emission model with themoactivative destruction of composite material surface. Proceedings of the National Aviation University, 1 (62), 57–62.
  16. Kositskaya, T. N. (2010). Simulation of acoustic emission signals at mechanical destruction of composite. Proceedings of the Chernigov state technological university, 45, 214–220.

Published

2015-04-17

How to Cite

Филоненко, С. Ф. (2015). Infuencing processed composite material priperties on acoustic emission. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(5(74), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.40191