DOI: https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v38i1.2016.107721

Three-dimensional temporal migration according to initial data of areal seismic exploration

V. N. Pilipenko, A. O. Verpakhovskaya, V. B. Budkevich

Abstract


Migration methods are traditionally subdivided into two groups depending on carrying out the procedure of summing up the route by the method of common deep point (CDP): before and after summing up (pre- and post-stack migration in English variant). Despite the fact that while processing seismic data we use post-stack migration more often, pre-stack migration allows producing deep image of geological medium in more details that naturally increases the quality of interpretation of seismic exploration data. Therefore in the case when we need to study all the features of deep structure of geological environment, pre-stack migration will give us more informative result, especially while processing the data of areal seismic exploration in the areas with complicated tectonics. A variant of three-dimensional temporal finite-difference pre-stack migration has been proposed based on reverse extension of the wave field in temporal scale of depth, realized by solving of wave equation by obvious residual scheme. This approach guarantees a correct and steady solving of the problem of producing three-dimensional image of the environment demonstrated by practical example of processing the data, observed in Krasnolymansk area (Donbass region). 


Keywords


temporary migration; areal seismic exploration; parallelization of computations; migration of the original data

References


Verpakhovskaya A. O., Pilipenko V. M., Pilipenko E. V., Sidorenko G. D., 2013. A finite-deference method of pre-stack migration procedures and modeling of the wave field with parallelizing of calculation on cluster. Geoinformatika (3), 1—12 (in Russian).

Dyadyura V. A., Budkevich V. B., 2005. Defining corrective statics of ensembles equidistant tracks seismic 3D. In: UkrGGRI collection of scientific works (3). Kyiv, P. 71—83 (in Russian).

Pilipenko V. N., Verpakhovskaya A. O., Budkevich V. B., Pilipenko E. V., 2015. Formation of three-dimensional image of the medium by the sum of CDP for the studies of geological structure of mine fields. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 37 (4), 104—113 (in Russian).

Pilipenko V. N., Verpakhovskaya A. O., Gnevush V. V., 2012. The finite-difference wave migration of initial seismograms of central explosion point in time domain. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 34 (3), 40—48 (in Russian).

Samarskiy A. A., 1971. Introduction to the theory of difference schemes. Moscow: Nauka, 552 p. (in Russian).

Samarskiy A. A., Gulin A. V., 1973. Stability of difference schemes. Moscow: Nauka, 415 p. (in Russian).

Sheriff R., Geldart L., 1987. Seismic. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mir, 400 p. (in Russian).

Bancroft J. C., 2007. A Practical Understanding of Pre- and Poststack migration. Vol. 1 (Poststack). Is. 13 of Course notes series. SEG Books, Science. 486 p.

Biondi B., Palacharla G., 1996. 3D prestack migration of common-azimuth data. Geophysics 61, 1822—1832.

Cohen J. K., Stockwell Jr. J. W., 2011. CWP/SU: Seismic Unix Release No 43R2, an open source software package for seismic research and processing. Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines. 889 p.

Dai N., Willacy C. N., Pascual R. V., Gochioco L. M., Sun Y., Mecham B. B., 2002. 3D wave equation PSDM optimizes and improves imaging of subsalt prospects. The Leading Edge (12), 1224—1226.

Liu G., Liu Y., Ren L., Meng X., 2013. 3D seismic reverse time migration on GPGPU. Computers & Geosciences 59, 17—23.

Noris M. W., Falchney A. K., 2002. SEGY rev1 Data Exchange, format 1. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists. 49 p.

Rajasekaran S., McMechan G. A., 1995. Prestack processing of land data with complex topography. Geophysics 60, 1875—1886.

Sheriff R. E., 2002. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists. 402 p.

Zhang W., Wong Y., 2010. Efficient parallel hybrid computations for three-dimensional wave equation prestack depth imaging. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling 7, 373—391.

Zhu J., Lines L. R., 1998. Comparison of Kirchhoff and reverse-time migration methods with applications to prestack depth imaging of complex structures. Geophysics 63 (4), 1166—1176.




Creative Commons License
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter