The deep structure of the Greater Caucasus on the basis of geophysical data according to new technologies. 1. Gravimetry, magnetometry, local seismic tomography and micro seismic sounding

Authors

  • S. A. Ghonghadze Javakhishvili State University, M. Nodia Institute of Geophysics, Tbilisi, Georgia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v38i3.2016.107789

Keywords:

the Greater Caucasus, gravimetry, deep seismic sounding, seismic tomography, micro seismic sounding

Abstract

The data of gravity prospecting, magnetic prospecting and seismology for the study of deep structure of the earth crust of the Greater Caucasus according to software technologies have been processed and interpreted. The vertical sections depicting the distribution of the contrasts of the density and speeds in the earth crust up to the depth of 100 km under the Greater Caucasus have been constructed. Several speed and density heterogeneities of the zonal division of the Greater Caucasus, which make some corrections for the issues of orogenesis of the Greater Caucasus, have been distinguished. Comparative analysis of the obtained results and the results of the local seismic tomography and micro seismic sounding has been done.

References

Balavadze B. K., Shengelaya G. Sh., 1961. Main features the structure of the crust of the Greater Caucasus from gravity data. Doklady AN SSSR 136(6), 131—140 (in Russian).

Bloch Yu. I., 2009. Interpretation of gravity and magnetic anomalies. P. 126—170. sigma3d.com/pdf/books/blokh-2009.pdf (in Russian).

Gamkrelidze N. P., Gongadze S. A., Mindeli P. Sh., Kiria D. K., Yavolovskaya O. V., 2012. Physics of the Earth's crust Georgia. Tbilisi: The Institute of Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences of Georgia Pupl., 221 p. (in Russian).

Gorbatikov A. V., Rogozhin E. A., Stepanova M. Yu., Kharazova Yu. V., Andreeva N. V., Perederin F. V., Zaalishvili V. B., Mel'kov D. A., Dzeranov B. V., Dzeboev B. A., Gabaraev A. F., 2015. The pattern of deep structure and recent tectonics of the Greater Caucasus in the Ossetian sector from the complex geophysical data. Fizika Zemli 51(1), 26—37 (in Russian).

Gorbatikov A. V., Tsukanov A. A., 2011. Modeling of Rayleigh waves near the scattering velocity heterogeneities. Research opportunities microseismic sensing method. Fizika Zemli (4), 96—112 (in Russian).

Dolgal' A. S., Sharkhimullin A. F., 2009. "Gravitational imaging" — a practice ahead of theory. Geoinformatika (3), 59—64 (in Russian).

Kulakov I. Yu., 2013. A look at the processes under the volcanoes through the prism of seismic tomography. Vestnik RAN 83(8), 698—710 (in Russian).

Strakhov V. N., 2001. Interpretive process in gravity and magnetic — is the implementation of a common approximation approach. I. The basic ideas and design principles. Fizika Zemli (10), 3—18 (in Russian).

Adamia S., Alania V., Chabukiani A., Kutelia Z., Sadradze N., 2011. Greater Caucasus (Cavcasioni): a long-lived North-Tethyan back-arc basin. Turk. J. Earth Sci. 20, 611—28.

Koulakov I., 2009. LOTOS code for local earthquake tomographic inversion. Benchmarks for testing tomographic algorithms. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. 99(1), 194—214.

Published

2016-07-01

How to Cite

Ghonghadze, S. A. (2016). The deep structure of the Greater Caucasus on the basis of geophysical data according to new technologies. 1. Gravimetry, magnetometry, local seismic tomography and micro seismic sounding. Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal, 38(3), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v38i3.2016.107789

Issue

Section

Articles