Deformational regimes and kinematic environments of formation of up-to-date tectonic disruptions within the limits of the Mountain Crimea
It has been shown on the base of considerable tectonophysical material that producing of up-to-date tectonic disruptions within the limits of the Mountain Crimea is specified by broad spectrum of deformational regimes and kinematic environments. The technique of plotting is methodologically substantiated for stereographical models of deformational regimes by averaging the parameters of structural-kinematic parageneses of tectonic disruptions and displacements produced in similar conditions. These models reflect adequately regional environments of producing tectonic disruptions. Quantitative ratio of slickensides in parageneses, which make up the basis of corresponding models specify the measure of effects of these or other deformational regimes on the processes of tectogenesis in the region. The models and examples of shearing, upthrust- and upthrust-displacement deformational regimes are presented and their description is given.
Full Text:PDF (Русский)
Alekhin V. I., 2006. Fields of total strain and stress in uneven rock complexes Azov block of the Ukrainian shield. NaukovI pratsI DonNTU. SerIya gIrnicho-geologIchna 2(is.111), 144—152 (in Russian).
Atlas «Autonomous Republic of Crimea», 2003. Eds M. V. Bagrova, L. G. Rudenko. Kiev-Simferopol: Tauride National Univ. Vernadsky, Crimean Sci. Center of NAS of Ukraine and Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Institute of Geography of NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Advanced Technology, 32 p. (in Russian).
Borisenko L. S., Gintov O. B., Kitin M. A., Moore A. V., 1998 Tectonophysical data verhnemezozojskih dynamics of the Crimean Mountains in connection with the problem paleogeodynamic reconstructions in this region. 1-2. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 20(4), 32—39; 20(5), 71—77 (in Russian).
Borisenko L. S., Plakhotnyy L. G., 1997. Geodynamics Crimean Black Sea region as a consequence of the multilevel orogeny. In: Geodynamics Crimean Black Sea region. Simferopol: Institute of Geophysics NASU, Crimean advisory council, P. 54—64 (in Russian).
Borisenko L. S., Pustovitenko B. G., Novik N. N., Wolfman Yu. M., Dublyanskiy V. N., 1995. Some methodological aspects of seismic zoning of areas of modern mountain building and adjacent areas (for example, the Crimea). In: Seismicity and Seismic Zoning of Northern Eurasia. Moscow: UIPE RAS, P. 27—45 (in Russian).
Vvedenskaya A. V., 1969. Investigation of stresses and fractures in earthquake by means of dislocation theory. Moscow: Nauka, 136 p. (in Russian).
Wolfman Yu. M., 2008. On the influence of kinematic environments on cyclicity of geological processes within the Crimea and Northern Black Sea during the Alpine stage. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 30(5), 101—114 (in Russian).
Wolfman Yu. M., 2013a. Reflection different ranks voltage systems and their transformations in the processes seismotectogenesis. Geodinamіka (2), 31—33 (in Russian).
Wolfman Yu. M., 2007. Stereographic method of constructing models of structural and kinematic parageneses of secondary displacements along the tectonic discontinuities. Seismological Bulletin of Ukraine for 2005. Sevastopol: NPC «EKOSI-Gidrofizika», P. 179—184 (in Russian).
Wolfman Yu. M., 2013 б. Structural and kinematic identification of seismogenic zones of the Zagros (according to the decisions of earthquake focal mechanisms). Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 35(2), 38—64 (in Russian).
Wolfman Yu. M., Gintov O. B., Ostanin A. M., Kolesnikova E. Ya., Murovskaya A. V., 2008. On the role of structural and kinematic identification of tectonic faults in the formation of the structure and geodynamics of the Crimean region. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 30(1), 49—61 (in Russian).
Wolfman Yu. M., Kolesnikova E. Ya, Ostanin A. M., 2012. Results of the study tectonophysical recent tectonic faulting within the Crimean Black Sea region and their implications for geodynamic reconstructions. Azov-Black Sea polygon studying geodynamics and fluid dynamics of formation of oil and gas fields. Coll. reports X Int. Conf. «Crimea-2012». Simferopol, P. 101—116 (in Russian).
Gintov O. B., 2005. Field tectonophysics and its application in the study of crustal deformation in Ukraine. Kiev: Feniks, 572 p. (in Russian).
Gintov O. B., Isay V. M., 1988. Tectonophysical study faults crust. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 228 p. (in Russian).
Gintov O. B., Murovskaya A. V., 2000. Problems of crustal dynamics of the Crimean Peninsula in the Meso-Cenozoic (tectonophysical aspect). 1-2. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 22(2), 39—60; 22(3), 36—49 (in Russian).
Gonchar V. V., 2003. Stress field of the Crimean Mountains and its geodynamic interpretation. Dopovidi NAN Ukrainy (3), 97—104 (in Russian).
Gonchar V. V., Patalakha E. I., Gintov O. B., 2004. Models stretching and Prirazlomnoe inclusion in paleotectonic reconstruction of the Crimean Mountains. Dopovidi NAN Ukrainy (6), 112—118 (in Russian).
Gushchenko O. I., 1979. Method of kinematic analysis of the structures of destruction in the reconstruction of tectonic stress fields. In: Stress and strain fields in the lithosphere. Moscow: Nauka, P. 7—25 (in Russian).
Gushchenko O. I., Mostryukov A. O., Petrov V. A., 1991. Structure of the field of contemporary regional stress seismically active zones of crustal eastern Mediterranean active zone. Doklady AN SSSR 312(4), 830—835 (in Russian).
The conceptual debate Geodynamics Crimean Black Sea region, 1997. In: Geodynamics Crimean Black Sea region. Simferopol: Institute of Geophysics NASU, Crimean advisory council, P. 135—148 (in Russian).
Korchemagin V. A., Yemets V. S., 1987. Features of tectonic structure and stress field of Donbass and Eastern Azov. Geotektonika (3), 49—55 (in Russian).
Murovskaya A. V., 2011. Stress-strain state Heracleian volcano-tectonic unit of the Crimean Mountains. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 33(6), 46—56 (in Russian).
Novik N. N., Wolfman Yu. M., 1997. Evolution of planetary stress fields within seismically active regions of Ukraine, the latest breaks and discontinuous displacement. In: Geodynamics Crimean Black Sea region. Simferopol: Institute of Geophysics NASU, Crimean advisory council, P. 81—90 (in Russian).
Parfenov V. D., 1984. A Method tectonophysical analysis of geological structures. Geotektonika (1), 60—72 (in Russian).
Pustovitenko A. A., 2007. Crimea (catalog focal mechanisms). Earthquakes in Northern Eurasia in 2001. Moscow: GS RAS, (on CD) (in Russian).
Pustovitenko B. G., 2002. Focal mechanisms of earthquakes tangible Crimean Black Sea last 20 years. Proc .: Seismological Bulletin of Ukraine for 2000. Sevastopol: NPC «EKOSI-Gidrofizika», P. 59—64 (in Russian).
Reconstruction of kinematic environments latest faulting and seismicity Crimean Black Sea region in order to estimate the parameters of the local seismicity and seismic hazard specification: Report (Yu. M. Wolfman, B. G. Pustovitenko, A. A. Pustovitenko, E. Ya. Kolesnikova, A. M. Ostanin), 2011. Simferopol-Kiev: Institute of Geophysics NASU, 95 p. (in Russian).
Chekunov A. V., Kharitonov O. M., Borisenko L. S., Wolfman Yu. M., Kendzera A. V., Pustovitenko B. G., Sklar A. M., 1998. Detailed seismic zoning seismically active regions of Ukraine. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 20(1), 3—13 (in Russian).
Yudin V. V., 2011. Geodynamics Crimea. Simferopol: DIAYPI, 336 p. (in Russian).
Allmendinger R. W., Cardozo N. C., Fisher D., 2012. Structural Geology Algorithms: Vectors & Tensors. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer. Press, 289 p.
McKenzie D. P., 1969. The relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and the directions of the principal stresses. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 59(2), 591—602.
Delvaux D., Sperner B., 2003. New aspects of tectonic stress inversion with reference to the TENSOR program. New insights into structural interpretation and modelling. Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Pub. 212, 75—100.
- There are currently no refbacks.