Advanced methods for seismic imaging when mapping hydrocarbon traps associated with salt domes
Keywords:salt tectonics, near stock traps, seismic images, seismic migration, converted waves
AbstractThis paper is the first in a series of tutorials on the usage of modern migration methods for seismic imaging in areas of intense salt tectonics. In the paper, various types of hydrocarbon traps associated with salt domes in the Dnieper-Donets depression have been analyzed. Moreover, classification of methods for seismic imaging has been given. With examples from other sedimentary basins, the benefits of pre-stack migration, a consideration of multipathing of seismic energy and the usage of converted waves in imaging of near stock objects have been shown.
Albertin U., Woodward M., Kapoor J., Chang W., Charles S., Nichors D., Kitchenside P., Mao W., 2001. Depth imaging examples and methodology in the Gulf of Mexico. The Leading Edge 20 (5), 498—513.
Baysal E., Kosloff D.D., Sherwood J.W.C., 1983. Reverse time migration. Geophysics48 (11), 1514— 1524.
Bleistein N., Gray S.H., 2010. Amplitude calculations for 3-D Gaussian-beam migration using complex-valued traveltimes. 80 th SEG Meeting: Expand. Abstr. P. 3349—3353.
Burianyk M., 2003. Petroleum geophysics in Ukraine. The Leading Edge 22 (5), 430—433.
Buur J., Kuhnel T., 2008. Salt interpretation enabled by reverse-time migration. Geophysics 73 (5), VE211—VE216.
Chirvinskaya M. V., Sollogub V.B., 1980. Deep Structure of the Dnieper-Donets Aulacogen from Geophysical Data. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 180 p. (in Russian).
Cogan M., Zdraveva O., Kairzhanova T., Schoe- mann M., 2011. A wide-azimuth TTI model-building and imaging case study from the central Gulf of Mexico. 81st SEG Meeting: Expand. Abstr. 4056—4060.
Complex Program of Developing Hydrocarbon Resources in Permian and Carboniferous Carbonate Rocks of the Eastern Oil-and-Gas-Bearing Region: (Final report), 2012. SE Naukanaftogaz. Scientific head S. G. Vakarchuk. Kiev, 627 p. (in Ukrainian).
Development of Methods for Identifying and Mapping Subtle Subvertical Faults with Migration of Duplex Waves: (Final report), 2003. Ukrainian State Geological Prospecting Institute; Responsib
Farmer P., Zhou Z.Z., Jones D., 2009. The role of reverse time migration in imaging and model estimation. The Leading Edge 28 (4), 436—441.
Gray S.H., 2005. Gaussian-beam migration of common-shot records. Geophysics 70 (4), S71—S77.
Gray S.H., Bleistein N., 2009. True-amplitude Ga- ussian-beam migration. Geophysics 74 (2), S11—S23.
Gray S.H., Notfors C., Bleistein N., 2002. Imaging using multi-arrivals: Gaussian-beams or multiarrival Kirchhoff? 72nd SEG Meeting: Expand. Abstr. 1117—1120.
Hill N.R., 1990. Gaussian-beam migration. Geophysics 55 (11), 1416—1428.
Hill N.R., 2001. Prestack Gaussian-beam depth migration. Geophysics 66 (4), 1240—1250.
Hill N.R., Watson T.H., Hassler M.H., Sisemore L.K., 1991. Salt-flank imaging using Gaussian beam migration. 61st SEG Meeting: Expand. Abstr. 1178— 1180.
Jones I., 2013. A practical review of migration issues and solutions. 1st EAGE West Africa Workshop: Extend. Abstr.
Kim Y., Min D.-J., Shin C., 2011. Frequency-domain reverse-time migration with source estimation. Geophysics 76 (2), S41—S49.
Kosloff D.D., Baysal E., 1983. Migration with the full acoustic wave equation. Geophysics 48 (6), 677— 687.
Kozlov E.A., 2006. Medium Models in Prospecting Seismology. Tver: GERS Publ., 480 p. (in Russian).
Leggott R., Cowley J., Williams R. G., 2004. The case for applying wave equation depth migration in the North Sea. First Break 22 (8), 75—80.
Leveille J.P., Jones I.F., Zhou Z.-Z., Wang B., Liu F., 2011. Subsalt imaging for exploration, production, and development: A review. Geophysics 76 (5), WB3—WB20.
Levyant V.B., Khromova I.Yu., Kozlov E.A., Keru- sov I. N., Kashcheyev D. E., Kolesov V. V., Marma- lyevskyy N.Ya., 2010. Guidelines on the Use of Seismic Data to Assess Hydrocarbon Reserves in Carbonate Rocks with Fracture-Cavern Porosity. Moskow: CGE, Russia, 250 p. (in Russian).
Li S., Fomel S., Vladimirsky A., 2011. Improving wave-equation fidelity of Gaussian-beams by solving the complex eikonal equation. 81st SEG Meeting: Expand. Abstr. P. 3829—3834.
Liu Y., Chang X., Jin D., He R., Sun H., Zheng Y., 2011. Reverse time migration of multiples for subsalt imaging. Geophysics 76 (5), WB209—WB216.
Loewenthal D., Mufti I.R., 1983. Reversed time migration in spatial frequency domain. Geophysics 48 (5), 627—635.
Ma X., Wang B., Reta-Tang C., Whiteside W., Li Z., 2011. Enhanced prestack depth imaging of wide- azimuth data from the Gulf of Mexico: A case history. Geophysics 76 (5), WB79—WB86.
Marmalyevskyy N., Roganov Y., Kostyukevych A., Gazarian Z., Epov K., 2005. Elastic maximum-energy and maximum-divergence Kirchhoff migration. 67th EAGE Conference: Extend. Abstr. Paper P017.
Menyoli E., Shengwen J., Xu S., Graber S., 2011.Visi- bility analysis for optimal imaging of target areas and its application for a Gulf of Mexico deepwater data set. Geophysics 76 (5), WB119—WB126.
Mershchiy V. V., Makovenko D. V., Simachenko M. V., Renkas Yu.L., Lesnoy G.D., 2010. Application of Prestack Migration in the Conditions of Salt Dome Structures of Ukraine. Modern seismic methods when searching for oil and gas fields in complex structures (Seismo-2010): Proceedings of the 1st Int. sci. and pract. conf. Feodosiya: UkrGGRI (in Russian).
Neal S.L., Hill N.R., Wang Y., 2009. Anisotropic velocity modeling and prestack Gaussian-beam depth migration with applications in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. The Leading Edge 28 (9), 1111—1119.
Popov M.M., Semtchenok N.M., Popov P.M., Ver- del A.R., 2010. Depth migration by the Gaussian- beam summation method. Geophysics 75 (2), S81— S93.
Sava P., Hill S.J., 2009. Overview and classification of wavefield seismic imaging methods. The Leading Edge 28 (2), 170—183.
Sekulic D., Sepulveda H., 2004. Complimentary application of prestack depth Kirchhoff and Wave Equation migration methods toward final images in the Gulf of Mexico. 74 th SEG Meeting: Expand. Abstr. P. 214—2143.
Stewart R.R., Gaiser J.E., Brown R.J., Lawton D.C., 2003. Converted-wave seismic exploration: Applications. Geophysics 68 (1), 40—57.
Stovba S.M., Stephenson R.A., 2003. Style and timing of salt tectonics in the Dnieper-Donets Basin (Ukraine) : implications for triggering and driving mechanisms of salt movement in sedimentary basins. Marine and Petroleum Geology 19 (10), 1169— 1189.
Swanston A.M., Mathias M.D., Barker C.A., 2011. Wide-azimuth TTI imaging at Tahiti: Reducing structural uncertainty of a major deepwater subsalt field. Geophysics 76 (5), WB67—WB78.
Sydykov K.Zh., Sokolovskiy S. G., 2000. Some Peculiarities of Depth Migration of Seismic Data in the Precaspian Basin. Geofizika (2), 16—21 (in Russian).
Tiapkina O.M., Okrepkyj O.I., Kolisnichenko V.G., 2012. Seismic imaging and interpretation of salt — trapped prospects in the Dnieper-Donets Basin, Ukraine — Case studies. 74th EAGE Conference: Extend. Abstr. Paper B039.
Tiapkina O.M., Voitsytski Z. Y., Sydorenko G.D., Parhomenko T. V., 2008. Imaging and mapping of hydrocarbon traps in areas of complex salt tectonics in Ukraine — Case studies. 70th EAGE Conference: Extend. Abstr. Paper P076.
Voitsytski Z. Ya., Sydorenko G.D., Parhomenko T. V., Tiapkina A.N., Khoma R.S., 2007. Application of Seismic Data Migration According to Current Trends in the Development of Seismic Exploration Method. Geoinformatika (4), 23—30 (in Russian).
Winbow G., 2009. CRAM and Kirchhoff images of a west Africa salt structure. The Leading Edge 28 (2), 146—155.
Winbow G., Clee T., Rainwater M., 2007. Multipath imaging into common-reflection-angle volumes at a GOM site. The Leading Edge 26 (11), 1430— 1433.
Xu S., Zhang Y., Tang B., 2011. 3D angle gathers from
Zhang Y., Zhang G., 2009. One-step extrapolation method for reverse time migration. Geophysics 74 (4), A29—A33.
Zhang Y., Zhang H., Zhang G., 2011. A stable TTI reverse time migration and its implementation. Geophysics 76 (3), WA3—WA11.
Zhu T., Gray S.H., Wang D., 2007. Prestack Gaus- sian-beam depth migration in anisotropic media. Geophysics 72 (3), S133—S138.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).