Modeling of regional magnetic field applying spherical functions: practical aspect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v41i6.2019.190073Keywords:
regional magnetic field, spherical functions, modelingAbstract
Modeling of geomagnetic field and creation of geomagnetic maps is one of the main directions of geomagnetic studies. For constructing global model the global spherical Lejeandre functions are used in most cases, though for constructing regional magnetic field it is impossible to use such an approach, because in this case spherical Lejeandre functions lose their orthogonality, and the solution becomes ambiguous. In this work we tested a method of constructing regional magnetic field applying spherical Lejeandre functions of effective order and integral power. Such functions generate a system of functions orthogonal by weight on an arbitrary spheric trapezium, though they lack recurrent correlations, that is why for their calculation we have to apply an expansion in hypergeometric series. An area of determination of such functions in spherical coordinate system is a spherical segment. As initial data measurements of geomagnetic field components Bx, By, Bz from nine geomagnetic observatories situated in the Central Europe by 2010-s were used. There are both regional and local components in this area, though anomalous field here is of weak intensity, therefore we may consider it in the first approximation as a regional one. Regional modeling of geomagnetic field was conducted within the limits of a procedure «Extraction-Calculation-Reconstruction». With this purpose we need first of all to calculate a systematic component of components using the global model. As a systematic component we used a global model International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) for this epoch. Abnormal values of geomagnetic field components ΔBx, ΔBy, ΔBz were calculated and unknown coefficients of the model were found by the method of the least squares. For stabilization of solution a regularization Tikhonov parameter was introduced. Dispersion of the model obtained was also calculated. Standard deviations of anomalous values of geomagnetic field components, their model values and difference between them have been given. Estimation of precision of the model obtained has been undertaken.References
Orlyuk, M. I. (2000). Spatial and spatial-temporal magnetic models of different-rank structures of the lithosphere of continental type. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal, 22(6), 148—165 (in Russian).
Orlyuk, M. I., Marchenko, A. V., & Romenets, A. A. (2017). Spatial-temporeral changes in the geomagnetic field and seismisity. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal, 39(6), 84—105. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v39i6.2017. 116371 (in Russian).
Sumaruk, Yu. P., Yankiv-Vitkovska, L. M. & Dzhuman, B. B. (2019) Modeling of regional magnetic field applying spherical functions: theoretical aspect. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal, 41(1), 180—191. https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v41i1.2019.158872 (in Ukrainian).
Beggan, C. D., Saarimaki, J., Whaler, K. A. & Simons, F. J. (2013). Spectral and spatial decomposition of lithospheric magnetic field models using spherical Slepian functions. Geophysical Journal International, 193(1), 136—148. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs122.
De Santis, A. (1992). Conventional spherical harmonic analysis for regional modeling of the geomagnetic field. Geophysical Research Letters, 19(10), 1065—1067. https://doi.org/10. 1029/92GL01068.
De Santis, A. (1991). Translated origin spherical cap harmonic analysis. Geophysical Journal International, 106(1), 253—263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb04615.x.
De Santis, A. & Torta, J. (1997). Spherical cap harmonic analysis: a comment on its proper use for local gravity field representation. Journal of Geodesy, 71(9), 526—532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900050120.
Düzgit, Z., & Malin, S. R. C. (2000). Assessment of regional geomagnetic field modeling methods using a standard data set: spherical cap harmonic analysis. Geophysical Journal International, 141(3), 829—831. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00099.x
Dzhuman, B. B. (2014). Approximation of gravity anomalies by method of ASHA on Arctic area. Geodesy, cartography and aerial photography, (80), 62—68.
Dzhuman, B. B. (2017). Modeling of the Earth’s gravitational field using spherical function. Geodesy, cartography and aerial photography, (86), 5—10. https://doi.org/10.23939/istcgcap2017.02.005.
Dzhuman, B. B. (2018). Modeling of the regional gravitational field using first and second derivative of spherical functions. Geodesy, cartography and aerial photography, (88), 5—12. https://doi.org/10.23939/istcgcap2018.02.005.
Gao, Y., & Liu, Z. (2002). Precise Ionosphere Modeling Using Regional GPS Network Data. Journal of Global Positioning Systems, 1(1), 18—24.
Haines, G. (1988). Computer programs for spherical cap harmonic analysis of potential and general fields. Computers & Geosciences, 14(4), 413—447. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-3004(88)90027-1.
Haines, G. (1985). Spherical cap harmonic analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 90(B3), 2583—2591. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB03p02583.
Hwang, C. & Chen, S. (1997). Fully normalized spherical cap harmonics: application to the analysis of sea-level data from TOPEX/POSEIDON and ERS-1. Geophysical Journal International, 129(2), 450—460. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb01595.x.
Kotzé, P. B. (2001). Spherical Cap Modelling of Ørsted Magnetic Field Vectors over Southern Africa. Earth, Planets and Space, 53(5), 357—361. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352392.
Macdonald, H., (1900). Zeroes of the spherical harmonic Eqn027.eps considered as a function of n. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 31(1), 264—278. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s1-31.1.264.
Orlyuk, M., Marchenko, A., Romenets, A., & Bakarjieva, M. (2018). Ukrainian Regional Magnetic Map: the results of calculations of the geomagnetic field components for the Epoch 2015. COBS Journal (Special Issue: IAGA Workshop 2018, (5). 40.
Stening, R. J., Reztsova, T., Ivers, D., Turner, J., & Winch, D. E. (2008). Spherical cap harmonic analysis of magnetic variations data from mainland Australia. Earth, Planets and Space, 60(12), 1177—1186. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352875.
Thébault, E., Finlay, C. C., Beggan, C. D., Alken, P., Aubert, J., Barrois, O., Bertrand, F., ... Zvereva, T.(2015). International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the 12th generation. Earth, Planets and Space, 67, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9.
Thébault, E., & Gaya-Piqué, L. (2008). Applied comparisons between SCHA and R-SCHA regional modeling techniques. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 9(7), Q07005, doi: 10.1029/2008GC001953.
Thébault, E., Mandea, M. & Schott, J. (2006). Modeling the lithospheric magnetic field over France by means of revised spherical cap harmonic analysis (R-SCHA). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111(B5), 111—113. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004110.
Yankiv-Vitkovska, L. M. & Dzhuman, B. B. (2017). Constructing of regional model of ionosphere parameters. Geodesy, cartography and aerial photography, 85, 27—35. https://doi.org/10.23939/istcgcap2017.01.027.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
