On forecast and predictability of seismic process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v36i3.2014.116053Keywords:
seismicity, spontaneous fluctuations, dynamics, dynamical systems, auto synchronization of oscillationsAbstract
Special features of evolution of geo-medium, which has a quality of self-organized criticality, problems of physics of destruction in the earth's crust, predictability and forecast of seismic process dynamics are being discussed based on the ideas and methods of nonlinear dynamics. It is mentioned that the key problems of multileveled self organization and taking into account nonlinearity of hierarchically organized geo-systems are still weakly elaborated and need con-cretization. Attention is accentuated on some aspects of formation of focal zones of destruction in the earth's crust, the stage of pre-destruction and super-fast catastrophic stage of evolution. Regimes of excitation of autostructures in geo-medium, problems of repeatability of large-scale ruptures are considered. An attempt of interpretation of strong seismic event as an autostructure (autosoliton) of great amplitude or localized dissipative structure of sharpening, which are formed in geomedium in case of strict regime of its excitation as a part of the single seismic process. A set of problems is considered related to principal predictability of the process, quality of intermittence, synchronization, phenomenon of stochastic resonance, problems of dynamic description of nonlinear systems with chaotic behavior according to the data of monitoring observations. It is mentioned that the presence of a regime of sharpening of the process (pre-destruction phase) can be considered as a physical-mechanical basis of existence, manifestation and search of foreshock phenomena. From this viewpoint the problem of strong earthquakes forecast does not look like hopeless and gives reason for optimism.References
Anishhenko V. S., Astahov S. V., 2013. Theory returns Poincare and its application to problems of nonlinear physics. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 183 (10), 1009—1028 (in Russian).
Anishhenko V.S., Nejman A.B., Moss F., Shimanovskij-Gajer L., 1999. Stochastic resonanse enhanced order. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 169 (1), 7—38 (in Russian).
Bak P., Tang C., Wiesenfeid K., 1987. Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381—384.
Chernavkii D.C., Starkov N.I.; Maikov S. Yu., Kos- se Yu.V., Shcherbakov A.V., 2011. On econophysics and its place in modern theoretical economics. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 181 (7), 768—778 (in Russian).
Dobrovol'sky I.P., 2009. The Mathematical Theory of Preparation and Prediction of Tectonic Earthquakes. Moscow: Fizmatlit, 240 p. (in Russian).
Dremin I.M., Ivanov O. V., Nechitalo V.A., 2001. Wavelets and their applications. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 171 (5), 465—501 (in Russian).
Dubovikov M.M., Starchenko N. V., 2011. Ekonophy- sics and the fractal analysis of financial time series. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 181 (7), 779—786 (in Russian).
Earthquake Prediction: The Scientific Challenge Collected papers, 1996. Washington: National Academy Press. DC. 2000 55. http://www.ras.org. uk/ras.
Fridman A. M., Polyachenko E. V., Nasyrkanov N. R., 2010. On some correlations in seismodynamics and on two components of Earth's seismic activity. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 180 (3), 303—312 (in Russian).
Genshaft Ju.S., 2009. Earth — an open system: geological and geophysical investigation. Fizika Zem- li, (8), 4—12 (in Russian).
Gijon Je., Mitesku K.D., Julen Zh.-P., Ru S., 1991. Fractals and percolation in porous media. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 161 (10), 121—128 (in Russian).
Gufeld I. L., 2007. The seismic process. Physical and chemical aspects. Publisher name. Korolev, 160 p. (in Russian).
Gufeld I. L., 2013 6. On the degassing at depths and structure of lithosphere and upper mantle. Jelektronnyj zhumal "Glubinnaja neft" 1 (2), 172— 188.
Gufeld I.L., 2013 a. Is it possible to forecast strong crustal earthquakes. Vestnik RAN 83 (3), 236—245 (in Russian).
Gufeld I.L., Matveeva O.N., Novoselov O.N., 2011. Why we cannot predict strong earthquakes in the Earth's crust. Geodinamika i tektonofizika 2 (4), 378—415 (in Russian).
Horgan J., 2001. The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge is the Twilight of Science Age. Sankt-Peterburg: Amfora, 479 p. (in Russian).
Il'inskij JU.A., Keldysh L.V., 1989. The interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter. Moscow: MSU Publ., 304 p. (in Russian).
Kadomtsev B.B., 1994. Dynamics and Information. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 164 (5), 449—530 (in Russian).
Kagan Y.Y., 1994. Observational evidence for earthquakes as a nonlinear dynamic process. Physica D. 77, 160—172.
Keiiis-Borok V.I., 1994. Symptoms of instability in a system of earthquake-prone faults. Physica D. 77, 193—199.
Kerner B.S., Osipov V.V., 1989. Autosolitons. Sov. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 157 (2), 201—266 (in Russian).
Klimontowich YU.L., 1999. Entropy and information of open systems. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 169 (4), 443—453 (in Russian).
Knjazeva E.N., Kurdjumov S.P., 2000. Synergistic expansion of the anthropic principle. In: Synergetic Paradigm. Moscow: Progress, 80—106 (in Russian).
Kolesnichenko A.V., 2003. Synergetic approach to the description of nonequilibrium stationary turbulence astrogeophysical systems. Working paper. Moscow: Inst. Appl. Math. RAS, 70 p. (in Russian).
Kopytov V.V., Kostenko K.S., 2003. Investigating the effect of intermittency in systems of coupled nonlinear oscillators. Jelektronnyj zhurnal "Zhur- nal radiojelektroniki" (3) (in Russian).
Kosobokov V.G., 2004. The theoretical basis and earthquake prediction algorithms based precursors activate seismicity: Dr. phys. and math. sci. diss. Moscow, 32 p. (in Russian).
Landa P.S., Trubetskhov D.I., Gusev V.A., 2009. Delusions versus reality in some physics problems: theory and experiment. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 179 (3), 255—277 (in Russian).
Ljubushin A. A., 2013. Forecast Great Japan Earthquake and singularity of seismic noise. Moscow: IPE RAS Publ. http://www.seismicweather com /downloads/ russian nature Journal.pdf.
Ljubushin A.A., 2011. Earthquake disaster in Japan on March 11 2011: Long-term prognosis of low- frequency microseisms. Geofizicheskie processy i biosfera 10 (1), 9—35 (in Russian).
Loskytov A.YU., 2010. Fascination of chaos. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 180 (12), 1305—1329 (in Russian).
Makarov P.V., 2011. Self-organized criticality of deformable solids and media destruction and prospects forecast: Proceedings of the Intern. Conf. "Modern Problems of Applied Mathematics Mechanics: Theory, Experiment and Applications ", dedicated to the 90th anniversary of academician N.N. Janenko, Novosibirsk, Russia, 30 May — 4 June 2011 (in Russian).
Malineckij G.G., 1998. Chaos: puffins, paradoxes of hope. Komp'juterra (47) (in Russian). http:// old.computerra.ru/1998/275/2064.
Malineckij G.G., Kurdjumov S.P., 2001. Nonlinear Dynamics and Prediction Problems. Vestnik RAN 71 (3), 210—224 (in Russian).
Moskalenko O.I., Koronovskij A.A., Shurygina S.A., 2011. Behavior of nonlinear systems on the border of synchronization induced by noise. Neli- nejnaja dinamika 7 (2), 197—208 (in Russian).
Nekorkin V.I., Bezruchko B.P., Ponomarenko V.I., Prokhorov M. D., Smirnov D. A., Tass P. A., 2008. Methods of wave-based physics in neuroscience problems and applications. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 178 (3), 323—329 (in Russian).
Nikolaev A. V., 2002. Development of nonlinear geophysics. Vestnik OGGGGG RAN 1, 5 p. (in Russian).
Panin V.E., Egorushkin V.E., Panin A. V., 2012. Nonlinear wave processes in a deformable solids multiscale hierarchically organized system. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 182 (12), 1351—1357 (in Russian).
Panteleev I.A., Plekhov O.A., Naimark O.B., 2013. Model of geomedia containing defects: collective effects of defects evolution during formation of potential earthquake foci. Geodinamika i tektonofizika 4 (1), 37—51 (in Russian).
Pavlov A.N., Anishenko V.S., 2007. Multifractal analysis of complex signals. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 177 (8), 859—870 (in Russian).
Perke S.L., Carison M.M., 1994. Predictability of selforganizing systems. Phys. Rev. E 50, 236—242.
Rumanov E.N., 2013. Critical phenomena far from equilibrium. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 182 (12), 1351—1357 (in Russian).
Sadovskij M.A., 2004. Geophysics and Physics of explosion. Selected Works. Moscow: Nauka, 440 p. (in Russian).
Shapovai A.B., 2011. Questions predictability in isotropic models with self-organized criticality: Dr. phys. and mathem. sci. dis. Moscow, 35 p. (in Russian).
Sherman S.I., 2005. Tectonophysical analysis of seismic process in zones of active faults of the lithosphere and the problem of medium-term earthquake prediction. Geofizicheskij zhurnai 27 (1), 20—38 (in Russian).
Shuman V.N., 2011 6. Geomedium as an open nonlinear dissipative dynamic system — the prob
Shuman V.N., 2011 a. Geomedium and seismic process: problems of management. Geofizicheskij zhurnai 33 (2), 16—27 (in Russian).
Shuman V.N., 2013 6. Generalized equation for generation of the spontaneous electromagnetic emission in the fractal medium. Geofizicheskij zhurnai 35 (3), 46—53 (in Russian).
Shuman V.N., 2013 a. On the problem of the background electromagnetic-acoustic redulation of seismic activity: geo-engineering aspect. Geofizicheskij zhurnai 35 (1), 46—60 (in Russian).
Shuman V.N., 2013 B. On phenomenological models and seismic activity prediction: whether pessimism is legitimate or hopes are substantiated. Geofizicheskij zhurnai 35 (2), 24—37 (in Russian).
Sidorin A.Ja., 2011. Outstanding achievement of the Russian Academy of Sciences: successful prediction of the earthquake in Japan March 11, 2011. Geofizicheskie processy i biosfera 10 (1), 5— 8 (in Russian).
Strakhov V. N., Savin M.G., 2013 6. On scientific principles of short-term earthquake prediction. Geofizicheskij zhurnal 35 (2), 18—24 (in Russian).
Strakhov V.N., 1989. Towards a new paradigm of seismology. Priroda (12), 4—6 (in Russian).
Strakhov V.N., Savin M.G., 2013 a. On the control of seismic activity. Geofizicheskij zhurnal 35 (6), 3—10 (in Russian).
Strakhov V.N., Savin M.G., 2013 B. Seismic hazard reduction: lost opportunities. Geofizicheskij zhur- nal 35 (1), 4—11 (in Russian).
Trofimenko S.V., 2011. Structure and dynamics of geophysical fields and seismic processes in crustal block model: Dr. geol. and min. sci. dis. Tomsk, 36 p. (in Russian).
Vasil'ev A. N., Romanovskij Ju. M., Jahno V. G., 1979. Wave processes in distributed kinetic systems. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 128 (4), 625—666 (in Russian).
Vikulin A. V., 2003. Physics wave seismic process. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 150 p. (in Russian).
Vol A., Gilat A., 2006. Primary hydrogen and helium as energy sources earthquakes. In: Genesis of hydrocarbon fluids and deposits (Eds A. Dmitrievskij, B. Valyaev). Moscow: GEOS, 160—166 (in Russian).
Zosimov V.V., Ljamshev L.M., 1995. Fractals in wave processes. Uspehi fizicheskih nauk 165(4), 362— 402 (in Russian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
