Comparison of conventional and magnetic resonance defecography for diagnosis of outlet obstructive syndrome

Main Article Content

E. Gemici
M.A. Bozkurt
A. Kocataş
A. Sürek
M. Karabulut
A. Akdoğan Gemici


Background. Outlet obstruction syndrome refers to all pelvic floor dysfunctions that are responsible for incomplete evacuation of fecal contents from the rectum. Defecography is the first step for diagnosis of outlet obstruction syndrome. The free selection of imaging planes, good temporal resolution, and excellent soft tissue contrast has helped to transform this method into the preferred imaging modality for evaluation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction. The purpose of our study was to compare conventional and magnetic resonance (MR) defecography in patients who were admitted for outlet obstruction syndrome. Materials and methods. Twenty-eight patients who presented with constipation between January 2015 and January 2020 were included in this study. MR defecography was performed 1 to 2 weeks after conventional defecography. The methods were compared with regard to their ability to diagnose anterior rectocele, internal mucosal intussusception with or without rectocele, and puborectal spasm. Additional abnormalities were also noted. Results. Comparison of conventional and MR defecography for their ability to diagnose anterior rectocele, internal mucosal intussusception, and puborectal spasm showed no significant differences between the 2 methods. The continuity correction ratio of the 2 methods for diagnosis of anterior rectocele, internal mucosal intussusception, and puborectal spasm was 0.146, 0.007, and 1.000, respectively. Conclusions. Although conventional defecography is the gold standard for diagnosis of rectocele, intussusception, and puborectal spasm, MR defecography has garnered considerable attention due to the lower radiation, increased safety, and higher incidence for diagnosis of another pathology, such as uterine diversion.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gemici, E., M. Bozkurt, A. Kocataş, A. Sürek, M. Karabulut, and A. A. Gemici. “Comparison of Conventional and Magnetic Resonance Defecography for Diagnosis of Outlet Obstructive Syndrome”. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY (Ukraine), vol. 16, no. 4, May 2020, pp. 322-6, doi:10.22141/2224-0721.16.4.2020.208485.
Original Researches


Jones R, Lydeard S. Irritable bowel syndrome in the general population. BMJ. 1992;304(6819):87-90. doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6819.87.

Talley NJ, Zinsmeister AR, Van Dyke C, Melton LJ 3rd. Epidemiology of colonic symptoms and the irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1991;101(4):927-934. doi:10.1016/0016-5085(91)90717-y.

D'Hoore A, Penninckx F. Obstructed defecation. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5(4):280-287. doi:10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00497.x.

Faccioli N, Comai A, Mainardi P, Perandini S, Moore F, Pozzi-Mucelli R. Defecography: a practical approach. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2010;16(3):209-216. doi:10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.2584-09.1.

Martín-Martín GP, García-Armengol J, Roig-Vila JV, et al. Magnetic resonance defecography versus videodefecography in the study of obstructed defecation syndrome: Is videodefecography still the test of choice after 50 years?. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(10):795-802. doi:10.1007/s10151-017-1666-0.

Foti PV, Farina R, Riva G, et al. Pelvic floor imaging: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and conventional defecography in studying outlet obstruction syndrome. Radiol Med. 2013;118(1):23-39. doi:10.1007/s11547-012-0840-8.

Pannu HK, Kaufman HS, Cundiff GW, Genadry R, Bluemke DA, Fishman EK. Dynamic MR imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics. 2000;20(6):1567-1582. doi:10.1148/radiographics.20.6.g00nv311567.

Piloni V, Bergamasco M, Melara G, Garavello P. The clinical value of magnetic resonance defecography in males with obstructed defecation syndrome. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(3):179-190. doi:10.1007/s10151-018-1759-4.

Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut. 1989;30(12):1737-1749. doi:10.1136/gut.30.12.1737.

Siproudhis L, Dautrème S, Ropert A, et al. Dyschezia and rectocele--a marriage of convenience? Physiologic evaluation of the rectocele in a group of 52 women complaining of difficulty in evacuation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(11):1030-1036. doi:10.1007/BF02047295.

Pfeifer J, Oliveira L, Park UC, Gonzalez A, Agachan F, Wexner SD. Are interpretations of video defecographies reliable and reproducible?. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12(2):67-72. doi:10.1007/s003840050083.

Johansson C, Nilsson BY, Mellgren A, Dolk A, Holmström B. Paradoxical sphincter reaction and associated colorectal disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992;7(2):89-94. doi:10.1007/BF00341293.

Bharucha AE, Wald A, Enck P, Rao S. Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(5):1510-1518. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.064.

Halligan S, Malouf A, Bartram CI, Marshall M, Hollings N, Kamm MA. Predictive value of impaired evacuation at proctography in diagnosing anismus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(3):633-636. doi:10.2214/ajr.177.3.1770633.

Roos JE, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S, Willmann JK, Marincek B, Hilfiker PR. Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease. Radiographics. 2002;22(4):817-832. doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl02817.

Reiner CS, Tutuian R, Solopova AE, Pohl D, Marincek B, Weishaupt D. MR defecography in patients with dyssynergic defecation: spectrum of imaging findings and diagnostic value. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(998):136-144. doi:10.1259/bjr/28989463.

Nosek M, Golonka A, Kalińska-Lipert A, Nachulewicz P. Rectal duplication with sciatic hernia. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015;10(2):282-285. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2015.52708.

Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, Treiber K, Marincek B, Hilfiker PR. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology. 2002;223(2):501-508. doi:10.1148/radiol.2232010665.

Bolog N, Weishaupt D. Dynamic MR imaging of outlet obstruction. Rom J Gastroenterol. 2005;14(3):293-302.

Delemarre JB, Kruyt RH, Doornbos J, et al. Anterior rectocele: assessment with radiographic defecography, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(3):249-259. doi:10.1007/BF02048163.

Vanbeckevoort D, Van Hoe L, Oyen R, Ponette E, De Ridder D, Deprest J. Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9(3):373-377. doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199903)9:3<373::aid-jmri2>;2-h.

Vitton V, Vignally P, Barthet M, et al. Dynamic anal endosonography and MRI defecography in diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders: comparison with conventional defecography. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(11):1398-1404. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822e89bc.

Cappabianca S, Reginelli A, Iacobellis F, et al. Dynamic MRI defecography vs. entero-colpo-cysto-defecography in the evaluation of midline pelvic floor hernias in female pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(9):1191-1196. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1218-4.

Schreyer AG, Paetzel C, Fürst A, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance defecography in 10 asymptomatic volunteers. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(46):6836-6842. doi:10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6836.