Influence of anesthesia techniques of caesarean section on memory, perception and speech.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2014.2.28333Keywords:
caesarian section, cognitive functions, anesthesiaAbstract
In obstetrics postoperative cognitive dysfunctions may take place after caesarean section and vaginal delivery with poor results both for mother and child. The goal was to study influence of anesthesia techniques following caesarian section on memory, perception and speech. Having agreed with local ethics committee and obtained informed consent depending on anesthesia method, pregnant women were divided into 2 groups: 1st group (n=31) had spinal anesthesia, 2nd group (n=34) – total intravenous anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia: 1.8-2.2 mLs of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. ТIVА: Thiopental sodium (4 mgs kg-1), succinylcholine (1-1.5 mgs kg-1). Phentanyl (10-5-3 µgs kg-1 hour) and Diazepam (10 mgs) were used after newborn extraction. We used Luria’s test for memory assessment, perception was studied by test “recognition of time”. Speech was studied by test "name of fingers". Control points: 1 - before the surgery, 2 - in 24h after the caesarian section, 3 - on day 3 after surgery, 4 - at discharge from hospital (5-7th day). The study showed that initially decreased memory level in expectant mothers regressed along with the time after caesarean section. Memory is restored in 3 days after surgery regardless of anesthesia techniques. In spinal anesthesia on 5-7th postoperative day memory level exceeds that of used in total intravenous anesthesia. The perception and speech do not depend on the term of postoperative period. Anesthesia technique does not influence perception and speech restoration after caesarean sections.References
Зайцев В.М. Прикладная медицинская статис¬тика / Зайцев В.М., В.Г. Лифляндский, В.И. Маринкин. – СПб.: ООО «Изд-во Фолиант», 2003.- 432 с.
Захаров В.В. Нервно-психические нарушения: диагностические тесты / В.В. Захаров, Т.Г. Возне¬сен¬ская.- М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2013. – 320 с.
Лесной И.И. Сравнение эффективности двух подходов к аналгезии у хирургических больных в отделении интенсивной терапии / И.И. Лесной // Укр. журнал клiнiч. та лаб. медицини. — 2012. — Т. 7. — С. 71-79.
Нейропротекция в анестезиологии и интен¬сивной терапии / Е.Н. Клигуненко, Л.А. Дзяк, Ю.А. Пло¬щенко [и др.] // Міжнар. неврол. журнал. — 2008. – № 2. – С. 41-50.
Профилактика и коррекция послеоперационных когнитивных дисфункций у больных пожилого возраста (метод. рекомендации) / Л.В. Усенко, Шади Эйд Ризк, А.А. Криштафор [и др.]. — Днепропетровск, 2008. – 60 с.
Усенко Л.В. Когнитивные нарушения после общей анестезии при экстракардиальных вмеша¬тельствах и эффект раннего введения Тиоцетама в послеоперационном периоде / Л.В. Усенко, И.С. Полинчук // Междунар. неврол. журнал. – 2011. – № 6, (44). – С. 132-136.
Усенко Л.В. Когнитивсберегающие техноло¬гии в анестезиологии / Л.В. Усенко, И.С. Полинчук, С.В. Болтянский // Біль, знеболювання і інтенсивна терапія. — 2011. — № 2 додаток. — С. 192-193.
Cognitive dysfunction after minor surgery in the elderly / J. Conet, J. Raeder, L.S. Rasmussen [et al.] // Acta Anesth. Scand. — 2003. — Vol. 47, N 10. — Р. 1204-1210.
Does anesthesia case postoperative cognitive disfunction? A randomized study of regional versus ge¬neral anesthesia in 438 elderly patients / L.S. Rasmussen, T. Jonson, H.M. Kuipers [et al.] // Acta Anesth. Scand. — 2003. — Vol. 47, N 9. — P. 1188-1194.
Fisher J. Adverse psychological impact of operative obstetric interventions: a prospective longitu¬dinal study / J. Fisher, J. Astbury, A. Smith //Aust N. Z. J. Psychiatry.– 1997.– Vol. 31, N 5.– Р.728-38.
Ghosh S. The possibility of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in obstetric anaesthesia following caesarean section// Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. – 2012. – Vol. 29, N 2. – P.61–63.
Hopkins R.O. Long-term neurocognitive function after critical illness / R.O. Hopkins, J.C. Jackson // Chest. — 2006. – Vol. 130. – P. 869-878.
Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007 / E. Declercq, R. Young, H. Cabral, J. Ecker // Birth. – 2011. –Vol. 38, N 2. – Р.99-104.
Radovanovic D. Awareness during general ana¬esthesia-implications of explicit intraoperative recall / D. Radovanovic, Z. Radovanovic // Eur. Rev. Med. Pharma¬col Sci. – 2011. – Vol. 15, N 9. – P. 1085-1089.
The impact of the type of anaesthesia on cognitive status and delirium during the first postoperative days in elderly patients / A. Papaioannou, O. Fraidakis, D. Micha¬loudis [et al.] // Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2005 – Vol. 22, Issue 7. – P. 492–499.
Zaycev VM, Liflyandsky VG, Marinkin VI. [Applied medical statistics]. SPb.: JSC “Publishing House Foliant”. 2003;432. Russian.
Zakharov VV, Voznesenskaya TG. [Psychological violations: diagnostic tests]. Moscow.: Medpress-inform. 2013;320. Russian.
Lesnoy II. [Comparison of efficiency of two approaches to a analgesia in surgical patients in intensive care unit]. Ukraїns'kiy zhurnal klinichnoї ta laboratornoї meditsini. 2012;7:71-9. Russian.
Kligunenko EN, Dzyak LA, Ploshchenko YuA. [The neuroprotection in anesthesiology and intensive care]. International Neurological Journal. 2008;2:41-50. Ukrainian.
Usenko LV, Shady Ade Rizk, Krishtafor AA, Kanjuka GS, Kushch IP. [Prevention and correction of postoperative cognitive dysfunctions in elderly patients (methodical recommendations)]. Dnepropetrovsk: DGMA, 2008;60. Russian.
Usenko LV, Polinchuk IS. [Cognitive violations after general anesthesia of the extracardiac interventions and effect of early introduction of Tiotsetam after surgery. International Neurological Journal. 2011;6(44):132-6. Russian.
Usenko LV, Polinchuk IS, Boltyanskiy SV. [The technologies of cognition saving in anesthesiology]. Bіl', znebol. і іntensivna terapіya. 2011;2(d):192-3. Russian.
Conet J, Raeder J, Rasmussen LS. Cognitive dys¬function after minor surgery in the elderly. Acta Anesth. Scand. 2003;47(10):1204-10.
Rasmussen LS, Jonson T, Kuipers HM. Does anesthesia case postoperative cognitive dysfunctions? A randomized study of regional versus general anesthesia in 438 elderly patients. Acta Anesth. Scand. 2003;47(9):P. 1188-94.
Fisher J, Astbury J, Smith A. Adverse psycho¬logical impact of operative obstetric interventions: a prospective longitudinal study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1997;31(5):728-38.
Ghosh S. The possibility of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in obstetric anaesthesia following caesarean section. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29(2):61–3.
Hopkins RO, Jackson JC. Long-term neurocogni¬ive function after critical illness. Chest. 2006;130:869-78.
Declercq E, Young R, Cabral H, Ecker J. Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth. 2011;38(2):99-104.
Radovanovic D, Radovanovic Z. Awareness during general anaesthesia--implications of explicit intraoperative recall. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011;15(9):1085-9.
Papaioannou A, Fraidakis O, Michaloudis D, Balalis C, Askitopoulou H. The impact of the type of anaesthesia on cognitive status and delirium during the first postoperative days in elderly patients. Eur J Ana¬esthesiol. 2005;22(7):492–99.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Medical Perspectives
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Submitting manuscript to the journal "Medicni perspektivi" the author(s) agree with transferring copyright from the author(s) to publisher (including photos, figures, tables, etc.) editor, reproducing materials of the manuscript in the journal, Internet, translation into other languages, export and import of the issue with the author’s article, spreading without limitation of their period of validity both on the territory of Ukraine and other countries. This and other mutual duties of the author and all co-authors separately and editorial board are secured by written agreement by special form to use the article, the sample of which is presented on the site.
Author signs a written agreement and sends it to Editorial Board simultaneously with submission of the manuscript.
