About the Journal
Focus and Scope
The urgent problems of general, artistic, historical and practical aspects in the field of art and audiovisual production highlights in the bulletin.
The journal is addressed to scientists, experts, teachers and scientific and pedagogical workers who are engaged in scientific research and try to find value-semantic horizons of modern artistic, production and audiovisual processes.
Peer Review Process
Requirements for the content and design of articles
Procedure for accepting articles
Original problem articles that have never been published before (Ukrainian, Russian, Belarusian, English and EU languages) are accepted for publication in scientific collections.
The procedure of scientific examination are all research articles received by the editorial Board. The review process is carried out by members of the editorial Board and independent experts in the relevant fields and takes place within 14 days.
The editorial Board passes the article to the reviewers by the so-called double "blind" method of reviewing.
According to the results of the review, the editorial Board decides on:
- acceptance of the article;
- return of the article to the author for revision, taking into account the comments of reviewers;
- refusal to accept the article for publication.
The process of reviewing and editing articles is maximally automated. The database of the system stores information about the authors of scientific articles, reviewers, editors and contact information.
Reviewers receive an article without the name of the author (s) of the article, and the author (s) is not informed of the names of the reviewers.
Send articles in RTF format.
Review form (Appendix 1)
The editorial Board reserves the right to reject an article at the stage of preliminary consideration, if its content does not correspond to the subject and scientific direction of the journal, as well as the requirements for the structure and technical design of the article are not met.
The editorial Board of the scientific journal evaluates manuscripts on their intellectual content regardless of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship or political views of the author of a written scientific work (article).
The scientific article, which received positive reviews, is transferred to the literary and technical editing. Edited and prepared for publication materials before publication are finally agreed with the author.
The journal uses the Open Journal System to control the submission of materials and the review process. This system allows authors to submit their manuscripts, receive feedback from the Editorial Board online for further work process.
After submitting an article, authors can track the entire process of reviewing and preparing the article for publication in their personal account.
Publication Frequency
The scientific collection is published twice a year (April, October)
Open Access Policy
This journal practices a policy of immediate open access to published content, supporting the principles of the free dissemination of scientific information and the global exchange of knowledge for the sake of universal social progress.
Anti-plagiarism Policy
Articles submitted for review should have 85% uniqueness of the author's text. Verification is carried out by software ("UNICHEK"). Borrowing is allowed in the amount of 15% of the total volume of the article.
The Cost of Publication
The publication cost is free. Shipment of the journal is carried out at the expense of the authors.
Editorial Ethics
No waivers or discounts are offered for open access publication in Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts. Series in Audiovisual Art and Production.
The authors' ethics
The authors are obligated:
- submit an article that has not previously been published and is not being considered in another edition. If the elements of the manuscript were previously published in another article, the authors are required to refer to their earlier work.
- to provide in the article the facts and results of the conducted researches. The authors are responsible for the accuracy of the material in the article (dates, proper names, quotations, etc.). False or fraudulent statements equal to unethical behavior and are unacceptable;
- in case of necessity, at the request of the editorial board, provide the source data for the editorial review. Authors should provide free access to such data and store this data within a reasonable time after their publication;
- adhere to the ethics of scientific citation. In the case of using fragments of other people's works and / or borrowing the statements of other authors, the article should be made corresponding links.
- Articles that are compilations of materials published by other authors without their creative processing and their own author's reflection by the editors of the magazine are not accepted.
Editor's Ethics
Members of the editorial board are responsible for publishing the manuscripts provided and are guided by the following principles:
- reliability, scientific novelty and significance of materials presented for publication, their originality and independence;
- stop any cooperation with the author of the text is found plagiarism, violation of academic integrity and copyright;
- correspondence of scientific articles and other materials published for publication of the publication policy;
- prevent a conflict of interest between members of the editorial board with respect to articles that they reject or approve prior to publication;
- confidentiality in the organization of reviewing the articles provided for publication;
- observance of the copyright regarding the manuscripts submitted to consideration, the inadmissibility of their use by members of the editorial board for personal purposes or transfer to third parties;
- preservation of copyright by the authors after the articles’ publication and their placement in open access;
Ethics review
The purpose of the review of the article is to support the highest ethical scientific research standards:
- The objective of the reviewer is to objectively assess the quality of the article and determine the degree of its compliance with scientific and ethical standards;
- The reviewer should refuse to review if his qualification and direction of training do not correspond to the article's direction;
- To ensure the right of each author to intellectual property, the reviewer is prohibited from using any material of the article without the author's permission;
- In the case of a conflict of interest or professional or personal relationship between the reviewer and the author, which may affect the judgment of the reviewer, he must return the article, indicating a conflict of interest;
- Accusing of plagiarism requires a reviewer to justify his own observations. Any allegation of plagiarism or bias citation should be accompanied by appropriate justification;
- In case of doubts about plagiarism, authorship or falsification of data in the reviewer, it is obligatory to apply to the editorial board with the requirement for collective consideration of the author's article;
Journal History
The Ministry of Justice of Ukraine issued a Certificate of State Registration of the printed mass media No. 23118-12958 P Series KV from 25.01.2018.
