SOCIAL REPORTING AS AN INDICATOR OF THE ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30837/2522-9818.2018.3.091

Keywords:

financial reporting, social reporting, social responsibility of business

Abstract

Over the recent years, social activities have been a very significant index of the activity of domestic enterprises. These events do not indicate only the development of an enterprise but also suggests the opportunity to provide certain benefits to the society. But in Ukraine today there are no approved domestic standards which contain the structure of such reports and a list of issues that should be covered in them. This requires a thorough study of the theoretical and practical aspects of social reporting, the characteristics of foreign standards. The goal of the article is to study social responsibility, the aspects of social reporting, users, structure and indicators that can be included in it. The study deals with scientific works of foreign and domestic economists on the issues of social responsibility and accountability. The study is based on the combination of methods and approaches such as the dialectical method, the method of synthesis as well as the comparative and systemic ones. The following results were obtained: the issues of social responsibility of business and social reporting, the users of social reporting and their needs were investigated, international accounting practices were considered, namely the international standards of social reporting, such as Sunshine; AA1000; ISO 26000, SA8000 as well as the most famous and most commonly used GRI. The domestic practice of social reporting, problems and aspects domestic enterprises face were analyzed. On the basis of the analysis of international standards and the structure of social reporting of companies, the MLESQ indicator system is suggested, which can be applied for social reporting, taking into account the characteristics of the social activity of an enterprise. Conclusions. It is proved that solving the tasks of social reporting requires professional dialogue between social responsibility specialists, financial directors, accountants and auditors within the business structure itself.

Author Biography

Maria Karpushenko, O. M. Beketov Kharkiv National University of Urban Economy

PhD (Economics), Associate Professor, O. M. Beketov Kharkiv National University of Urban Economy, Associate Professor at the Department of Financial and Economic Security, Accounting and Audit

References

Andryushchenko, A. I., Ryabets, I. M. (2009), “Social responsibility: theoretical and methodological aspect of analysis” [Socialna vidpovidalnist: teoretiko-metodologichniy aspect analizy], Newsletter of Kharkiv National University im. V.N. Karazin, No. 844 (23), 133–135.

Bezverkhyy, K. S (2015), “Socially-oriented reporting of the enterprise” [Socialno-orientirovana zvitnist pidpriemstva], Accounting and auditing, No. 2-3, P. 70–78.

Bezruchuk, S. L. Laichuk, S. M. (2013), “Social Responsibility for Business: Reflections in Reporting” [Socialna otvetstvennost biznesa: otragenie v otchetnosti], International accounting, No. 27 (273). P. 33–40.

Berganir, A. L. (2017), “Social reporting as an element of the corporate social responsibility system” [Socialnaya otvetstvennost biznesa: otragenie v otchetnosti], Global and national problems of the economy, No. 16, P. 109–113.

Bogdanova, Z. A. (2013), “Development of social accounting: definition of basic concepts” [Razvitie socialnogo ucheta: opredelenie osnovnich poniatiy], Innovative economy, No. 7 (45), P. 293–296.

Bukovinskaya, M. P. (2016), “Corporate social responsibility as a factor of business and society development” [Korporativna socialna vidpovidalnist yak factor rozvitky biznecy I syspilstva], Formation of market relations in Ukraine, No. 5, P. 8–11.

Vorobey, V. (2009), “Social Reporting: Status and Prospects” [Socialna zvitnist : stan ta perspective], Materials of the United Nations Global Compact Network, P. 11.

Gilorme, T. V., Shachanina, Y. K. (2016), “Corporate Social Reporting as a Dominant of Information Support for Enterprise Management” [Corporativna socialna zvitnist yak dominant informaciynogo zabezpechennia upravlinnya pidpriemstvom], Economics and Society, No. 5. P. 672–677.

Davydyuk, T. V. (2016), “Social reporting as a direction of informing about human capital of the company. Problems and ways of achievement of socio-ecological and economic security at the micro, meso and macro levels” [Socialnaya zvitnist yak napriam informyvannya pro ludskiy kapital companii. Problemi ta shlyahi dosiagnennia sicio-ecologo-economichnoi bezpeki na mikro-mezo-ta makrorivni]: Materials of Ukraine science -practice internet conference, P. 62–65.

Korol, S. (2011), “Nonfinancial reporting of the enterprise” [Nefinansova zvitnist pidpremstv], KNTU Newsletter, No. 6, P. 102–113.

Evdokimov, V. V., Gritsyshen, D. O., Grishchenko, O. O., Barishnikova, O. M. (2013), “International models of reporting on sustainable development: an analysis of the current state” [Nefinansova zvitnist pidpriemstv] : Monogr., Zhytomyr: ZDTU, 192 p.

Solovey, T. N. (2014), Formation of financial statements of a socially active firm: Authors thesis [Formirovanie finansovoi otchetnosti socialno activnoi firmi, avtoref.dis. kand.econ.nauk], St. Petersburg, 25 p.

ISO / DIS 26000: Guidance on social responsibility, available at : https://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=llworkspace.

Sustainability Reporting Manual, available at : https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Russian-G4-Part-One.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-23

How to Cite

Karpushenko, M. (2018). SOCIAL REPORTING AS AN INDICATOR OF THE ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND SCIENTIFIC SOLUTIONS FOR INDUSTRIES, (1 (3), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.30837/2522-9818.2018.3.091

Issue

Section

Economic Sciences