CROSS-CULTURAL MANAGEMENT: OBSTACLES FOR EFFECTIVE COOPERATION IN MULTICULTURAL ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25140/10.25140/2410-957620172(10)195-202Keywords:
cross-cultural management, corporate culture, globalization, millennials, Denmark, Portugal, UkraineAbstract
Urgency of the research. The importance of studying the actual obstacles for effective cooperation in multicultural environment is determined by such modern trends as globalization, informational revolution, technological progress and growing impact of the Millennials. Target setting. It is reasonable to study the attitude of employees to work in a multicultural environment and to identify the most important obstacles for effective cross-cultural cooperation. Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The scientific works of such scholars as G. Hofstede, N. Adler, A.-M. Søderberg, N. Holden, J. Spencer-Rodgersa, T. McGovern and others deal with cross-cultural management issues. Defining of uninvestigated parts of general matters. Scientists have not yet sufficiently explored the correlation between motivation and cross-cultural interactions. It is also important to update any data about actual obstacles for effective cross-cultural interactions which might have changed due to the changes in the mentality of workers in the era of new technologies, Internet, globalization and arising role of the millennials. The research objective. The article aims to clarify the link between cross-cultural interaction and motivation of workers and to identify the most important obstacles for effective cross-cultural interactions. The statement of basic materials. The authors use survey results from 273 respondents from Denmark, Portugal and Ukraine who have experience of cross-cultural interactions to study the relation between motivation and work in a multicultural environment. The article proves the link between cross-cultural interaction and motivation of workers. The empirical data analysis let the authors identify the most important and widespread barriers (obstacles) for effective cross-cultural interactions among the following: language barrier, differences in values, differences in standards of behaviour, lack of trust, lack of experience, lack of knowledge about other cultures. Conclusions. Most people working in multicultural teams or projects treat cross-cultural interactions as a factor of additional motivation. On the other hand there are serious barriers (obstacles) for effective cross-cultural cooperation. Cross-cultural management has a wide range of approaches and specific techniques to overcome these barriers. Effective cross-cultural management can help to form diverse teams ready for effective cooperation with representatives from other cultures It gives more opportunities to expand the business to new markets, to form a global “diversity-friendly” brand.References
Lipman, V. (2016). Key Management Trends For 2016? Here Are 6 Research-Based Predictions. Forbes, Retrieved from : -http://www.forbes.com/sites/victorlipman-/2016/01/01/key-management-trends-for-2016-here-are-6-research-based-predictions/#67c7f0d41071 (Accessed February, 2016) [in Engilsh].
Jeannet, J.-P. (2000). Managing with a global mindset. London : Financial Times/Prentice Hall [in English].
Rosen, R. (2000). Global literacies: Lessons on business leaderships and national cultures. New York : Simon & Schuster [in English].
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications [in English].
Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. 1st edition, McGraw-Hill USA [in English].
Adler, N. (1991). International dimensions of organizational behaviour. Boston, MA : PWS-Kent Publishing Company [in English].
Hoecklin, L. (1995). Managing Cultural Differences: Strategies for Competitive Advantage. London: Economist Intelligence Unit/Addison Wesley [in English].
Luo, Y. (2016). Toward a reverse adaptation view in cross-cultural management, Cross Cultural & Strategic Management Vol. 23, No 1, 2016, pp. 29-41 [in English].
Søderberg, A.-M. and Holden, N. (2002). Rethinking cross cultural management in a globalizing business world. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 2(1): pp. 103–121 [in English].
Dodd, C. H. (1995). Dynamics of intercultural communication (4th ed.). Madison: Brown & Benchmark. [in English].
Gudykunst, W. B. (Ed.). (1986). Intergroup communication. Baltimore : E. Arnold [in English].
Spencer-Rodgersa, J., McGovern, T. (2002). Attitudes toward the culturally different: the role of intercultural communication barriers, affective responses, consensual stereotypes, and perceived threat, International Journal of Intercultural Relations 26, 2002, pp. 609–631 [in English].
Delecta J., Raman, C. (2015). “Cultural Communication Barriers in Workplace”, International Journal of Management, vol. 6, issue 1, pp. 348-351 [in English].
Lifintsev, D., Maximov, S., Yakovenko, M. (2016). Podolannia stereotypnoho myslennia yak skladova kroskulturnoho menedzhmentu [Overcoming stereotypical thinking as a component of cross-cultural management]. Effective economy, issue 4 [in Ukrainian].
Canavilhas, João (2015), Nuevos medios, nuevo ecosistema. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 4, pp. 357-362 [in Spanish].
Hall, Edward T. (1960). The silent language. Garden City, NY, Doubleday [in English].
Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kim, K., Farh, C. I. C. and Tangirala, S. (2010). “When does cross-cultural motivation enhance expatriate effectiveness? A multilevel investigation of the moderating roles of subsidiary support and cultural distance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 1110-1130 [in English].
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C. & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3 (3), pp. 35-371 [in English].
The official site of the World Bank (2016), Retrieved from : http://www.worldbank.org (Accessed March 2017) [in English].
Lifintsev, D. (2014). Transliatsiia tsinnostei korporatyvnoi kultury yak instrument formuvannia imidzhu kompanii [Broadcasting the Values of Corporate Culture as a Tool of Forming the Company's Image]. Business Inform, issue 12, pp. 440–443 [in Ukrainian].
The official site of G. Hofstede centre (2016). Retrieved from : https://www.geert-hofstede.com (Accessed March 2017) [in English].
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Scientific bulletin of Polissia ChNUT

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
1. Політика, яка рекомендується журналам, що пропонують відкритий доступ Автори, які публікуються у цьому журналі, погоджуються з наступними умовами:- Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution License, котра дозволяє іншим особам вільно розповсюджувати опубліковану роботу з обов'язковим посиланням на авторів оригінальної роботи та першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
- Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному сховищі установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
- Політика журналу дозволяє і заохочує розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання цього рукопису до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи (див. The Effect of Open Access).