Byron and Ukrainian literature: the problem of influence in the conceptualization by Y. Boyko-Blokhin

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2018.146338

Keywords:

literary reception, national literature, influence, interliterary interaction, Slavic context

Abstract

The article addresses views of Y. Boyko-Blokhin on reception of Lord Byron's heritage in Ukrainian literature of the XIX century and beginning of the XX century (from the perspective of approach of the expatriate researcher to comparative study of Slavic literatures). The concept of influence in interpretation of Y. Boyko-Blokhin is comprehended and correlated with opinions of modern comparativists. The article substantiates relevance of conclusions of Y. Boyko-Blokhin about the phenomenon of Ukrainian Byronism.

Great importance of the views of Y. Boyko-Blokhin, who developed traditions of national comparative studies, and, at the same time, applied the newest West European methodology, for continuous development of Ukrainian comparative literary criticism, is proved

Author Biography

Olga Teterina, Institute of Philology of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Tarasa Shevchenka blvd., 14, Kyiv, Ukraine, 10601

PhD

Department of History of Ukrainian Literature, Theory of Literature and Literary Creativity

References

Halych, O. A. (2006). Vitchyzniane literaturoznavstvo druhoi polovyny KhKh stolittia: na shliakhu do obiektyvnosti. Istoriia literaturoznavstva. Chastyna druha: ukrainske literaturoznavstvo. Luhansk, 109–140.

Khorob, S. (2005). Naukovyi universum Volodymyra Derzhavyna // Derzhavyn V. Literatura i literaturoznavstvo (Vybrani teoretychni ta literaturno-krytychni pratsi). Ivano-Frankivsk: Plai, 3–16.

Ilnytskyi, M. (2014). “Male literaturne vidrodzhennia”: literaturna krytyka periodu MURu. Znaky doby i hrani talantu. Kyiv: TOV Vydavnytstvo “KLIO”, 109–128.

Melnyk, V. (1992). Vidrodzhennia maibutnoho. Slovo i chas, 7, 16–17.

Oliinyk, O. (1999). Do 90-riachchia Boika-Blokhyna. Slovo i chas, 3, 41–43.

Scholz, F. (1989). Laudatio für Jurij Bojko-Blochyn aus Anlaß seines 80. Geburtstages am 25. März 1989. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. Universitatsverlag, 7–15.

Teteryna, D. (1998). Zhyttia i tvorchist Yuriia Boika-Blokhyna. Miunkhen-Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo imeni Oleny Telihy, 271.

Blokhyn, D. (2017). Epistoliarna spadshchyna Yuriia Boika-Blokhyna. Vol. 3. Miunkhen-Ternopil, 601.

Kopaniuk, M. Yu. (2012). Boiko-Blokhyn (1909–2002) – literaturnyi krytyk. Naukovi zapysky z ukrainskoi istorii. Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi, 92–99.

Bilokin, S., Boiko, Y. (1992). Zamist peredmovy. Vybrani tvory. Kyiv: Medekol, 3–6.

Boiko, Yu. (1981). Do problemy porivnialnoho vyvchennia istorii skhidnoslovianskykh literatur. Vybrane. Vol. 3. Miunkhen, 229–240.

Fylypovych, P. (2008). Bairon (krytychno-biohrafichnyi narys). Literaturoznavchi studii. Komparatyvistyka. Statti. Retsenzii. Cherkasy: Vydavnytstvo BRAMA-UKRAINA, 537–548.

Pavlychko, S. (1989). Bairon i Ukraina. Bairon: Narys zhyttia i tvorchosti. Kyiv: Dnipro, 165–197.

Kuzyk, D. N. (1977). Bairon v ukrainskii dozhovtnevii literaturi. Kyiv.

Boyko-Blochyn, J. Byrons Einfluß auf die russische, ukrainische und polinische Literatur. Gegen den Storm. Ausgewählte Beiträge zur Geschichte der slavischen Literaturen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. Universitatsverlag, 28–54.

Boiko, Yu. (1992). Tvorchist Tarasa Shevchenka na tli zakhidnoievropeiskoi literatury. Vybrani tvory. Kyiv: Medekol, 11–73.

Kulish, P. O. (1997). Boiko-Blokhyn Yu. Velykyi klasyk ukrainskoi literatury. Miunkhen-Chernivtsi, 50.

Boiko, Yu. (1992). Do problemy rozvytku Frankovoho styliu. Vybrani tvory. Kyiv: Medekol, 94–109.

Boiko, Yu. (1981). Estetychni pohliady Lesi Ukrainky ta yii stylovi shukannia. Vybrane. Vol. 3. Miunkhen, 241–286.

Boiko, Yu. (1974). “Kaminnyi hospodar” Lesi Ukrainky. Vybrane. Vol. 2. Miunkhen, 327–362.

Dyurishin, D. (1979). Teoriya sravnitel'nogo izucheniya literatury. Moscow: Progress, 320.

Dima, A. (1977). Principy sravnitel'nogo literaturovedeniya. Moscow: “Progress”, 229.

Nalyvaiko, D. (2006). Vstupne slovo. Teoriia literatury y komparatyvistyka. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim “Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia”, 3–4.

Leksykon zahalnoho ta porivnialnoho literaturoznavstva (2001). Chernivtsi: Zoloti lytavry, 634.

Kovaliv, Yu. I. (2007). Literaturoznavcha entsyklopediia. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr “Akademiia”, 607.

Franko, I. (1981). Internatsionalizm i natsionalizm u suchasnykh literaturakh. Zibrannia tvoriv. Vol. 31. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 33–44.

Reizov, B. (1986). “Istoriya i teoriya literatury”. Leningrad: Nauka, 319.

Veselovskiy, A. (1912). Etyudy i kharakteristiki. Vol. 1. Moscow, 562.

Zhirmunskiiy, V. M. (1978). Bayron i Pushkin. Ripol Klassik, 422.

Huber, K. (1985). Der Byronismus in der Ukrainischen Literatur. Ukrainische Romantic und Neoromantik von dem Hintergrund der europäischen Literatur. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitatsverlag, 131–140.

Fylypovych, P. (1971). Shevchenko i romantyzm. Literatura. New-York – Melborn: Drukarnia B. Ihnatova v Melborni, 53–75.

Zerov, M. (1990). Poetychna diialnist Kulisha. Tvory. Vol. 2. Kyiv: Dnipro, 247–293.

Franko, I. (1989). Lord Bairon. Zibrannia tvoriv, 29, 282–292.

Nikovskyi, A. (1913). “Don Zhuan” v ukrainskii literaturi. Rada, 7, 2.

Antokol'skiy, P. (1957). Lesya Ukrainka. Poety i vremya. Moscow: Sovetskiy spisatel', 74–81.

Laslo-Kutsiuk, M. (1979). Lesia Ukrainka i Herkhard Hauptman. Velyka tradytsiia. Bukharest, 236–258.

Published

2018-11-02

Issue

Section

Philology