Geopolitical world structure in the context of global space transformation

Authors

  • Уляна Ігорівна Рудницька Lviv Ivan Franko National University 1 Universytetska str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79000, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2015.52070

Keywords:

geopolitical structure, globalization, hierarchy, pole, space, world order, power area, typology, transformation, power center

Abstract

In this article it is investigated the question of space typology according to its characteristics and activities. It is analyzed the question of structuring the geopolitical space under the influence of globalization. It is distinguished geopolitical hierarchy of structural elements that form the model of geopolitical world structure. Also it is proposed hypothetical scheme of world order under condition of globalization

Author Biography

Уляна Ігорівна Рудницька, Lviv Ivan Franko National University 1 Universytetska str., Lviv, Ukraine, 79000

Aspyrant

Department of Area Studies and International Tourism 

References

Marunyak, Ye. (2012). Prostrovi dylemy hlobalizatsiyi ta yikh kontseptualizatsiya. Ukrayins'kyy heohrafichnyy zhurnal, 4, 36–42.

O’Toal, Dzh. (2009). Heopolitika postmoderna? Heopoliticheskye predstavlenyya moderna y za ikh predelamy. Politicheskaya nauka, 1, 178–185.

Zamyatin, D. N. (2001). Heopolitika: osnovnye probleme y itohy razvityya v XX v. Polis, 6, 97.

Bek, U. (2011). Vlada i kontrvlada u dobu hlobalizatsiyi: nova svitova politychna ekonomiya. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 460.

Wallerstein, I. (1982). World-System analysis: Theory and Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage, 109.

Komleva, N. A. (2012). Struktura myrovoho hospodstva. Prostranstvo y vremya, 1, 37–46.

Rosenau, J. (1990). Turbulence in World Politics. Princeton University Press, 480.

Lebedeva, M., Serheev, V. (2005). Mehapolys kak aktor mirovoy politiky. Kosmopolis, 4 (10), 193–200.

Fezerstoun, M., Lesh, S., Robertson, R. (2008). Hlobal'ni modernosti. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 400.

Il'in, Y., Leonova, O. (2013). Teoriya i praktika politicheskoy hlobalistiky. Moscow: Yzd-vo Moskovskoho Unyversiteta, 296.

Hol'tsov, A. H. (2013). Bahatopolyarna heopolitychna a orhanizatsiya svitu: problemy i tendentsiyi formuvannya. Naukovi pratsi MAUP, 3 (38), 30–35.

Mareeva, Yu. (2012). Stratehicheskiy treuhol'nyk «Rossiya – Indyya – KItay» v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh (Teoriya i istorycheskaya praktika). Vestnik MHIMO Unyvepsyteta, 5 (26), 240–249.

Global trends 2030: Alternative world (2012). National Intaligance Counsil Report, 55–59. Available at: http://www.dni.gov/files/documents/GlobalTrends_2030.pdf

Zhyrar, M. (1996). Indyvydy v mezhdunarodnoy politike. Moscow: Mezhdunarodna pedahohycheskaya akademiya, 204.

Castells, M. (2000). Communication Power. New York: Oxford University Press, 590.

Pyrozhnyk, Y. (2008). Heopolitika v sovremennom myre. Minsk: TetraSystems, 272.

Mazur, Y. Y., Chumakova, A. N. (Eds.) (2003). Hlobaystika: Entsyklopediya. Moscow: Raduha, 1328.

Chykharev, Y. A. (2009). Problematika politicheskoho prostranstva i vremeni v sovremennoy politolohii i mezhdunarodnykhiyssledovanyyakh. Politicheskaya nauka, 1, 7–32.

Published

2015-10-29

Issue

Section

Political Science