Research of the nomenclature of pharmaceutical specialties in Kazakhstan

Authors

  • Убайдилла Махамбетович Датхаев Institute of Pharmacy of the Kazakh National Medical University. S. Asfendiyarov 88 Tole bi str., Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 050012, Kazakhstan
  • Алма Рахимбаевна Шопабаева Kazakh National Medical University. S. Asfendiyarov 88 Tole bi str., Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 050012, Kazakhstan
  • Галлия Жанбурбаевна Умурзахова Kazakh National Medical University. S. Asfendiyarov 88 Tole bi str., Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 050012, Kazakhstan
  • Тина Сулеймановна Прокопенко College of the National University of Pharmacy 18 Alexander Nevsky str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61140, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2015.54992

Keywords:

nomenclature, clinical pharmacist, pharmacist-informer, pharmacist-technologist, questionnaire, pharmacist-manager, respondents, experts

Abstract

Pharmaceutical care, which quality largely depends on the pharmaceutical staff skills, is an integral part of the state system of implementation of the citizens’ rights to protect their health. Concerning this fact, specialists’ professional skills are state controlled and among the objects of relations in the area of remedies state regulation. The existing state control over maintenance personnel involves the implementation of specific actions, including such problem as the pharmaceutical specialties with staff positions harmonization.

Aim: the aim of our research was to study the explanation of necessity to expand the range of existing RK pharmaceutical specialties. Concerning the aim of research, the task was to explain from the scientific point of view the necessity to expand the range of existing RK pharmaceutical specialties and the implementation of new specialty «Clinical pharmacist».

Methods: The study was carried out by both the analytical and sociological methods.

Results: As a result of our sociological research (questionnaires for pharmacists) and literature analysis it was proved the level of professional knowledge and responsibilities of a particular specialty exceed the limits and expand them.

Conclusion: Therefore, it follows that pharmaceutical positions range expansion is a pressing question demanding its solution. We suggest the list of pharmaceutical positions must be determined in accordance with the needs of the circulation of remedies sphere in modern conditions

Author Biographies

Убайдилла Махамбетович Датхаев, Institute of Pharmacy of the Kazakh National Medical University. S. Asfendiyarov 88 Tole bi str., Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 050012

Doctor of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Professor

Rector

Алма Рахимбаевна Шопабаева, Kazakh National Medical University. S. Asfendiyarov 88 Tole bi str., Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 050012

Candidate of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Associate Professor

Head module "Pharmacist Manager"

Галлия Жанбурбаевна Умурзахова, Kazakh National Medical University. S. Asfendiyarov 88 Tole bi str., Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 050012

Doctoral student, specialty "Pharmacy"

Тина Сулеймановна Прокопенко, College of the National University of Pharmacy 18 Alexander Nevsky str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61140

Candidate of pharmaceutical sciences, associate professor

Director

References

Solonina, A. V. (2000). O nomenklature farmacevticheskih special'nostej i farmacevticheskih dolzhnostej. Jekonomicheskij vestnik farmacii, 9, 85–89.

Shertaeva, K. D., Ahimova, A. D. et. al. (2008). Razrabotka metodicheskih podhodov k optimizacii informacionnogo obespechenija specialistov (vrachej i farmacevtov) – na osnove komp'juternyh tehnologij. Metodicheskie rekomendacii – Astana, 22.

Fedina, E. A. (2004). Rasshirenie nomenklatury farmacevticheskih special'nostej. Obrazovanie, 43–44.

Skulkova, R. S. (1993). Sovremennye professional'no-dolzhnostnye trebovanija k special'nostjam s vysshim farmacevticheskim obrazovaniem. Moscow, 45–46.

Arystanova, T. A. (2010). Strategija razvitija farmacevticheskogo obrazovanija v Kazahstane. Farmobrazovanie – «Farmacija Kazahstana», 1, 41–44.

Fedina, E. A. (2006). Provizor – konsul'tant: Kvalifikacionnye trebovanija. Obrazovanie, 36–37.

Kareva, N. N. (2004). K voprosu o podgotovke farmacevticheskih kadrov // Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii posvjashhennyj 85-letiju akademii. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo SPHFA, 5–7.

Arystanov, Zh. M. (2004). Sovershenstvovanie professional'noj podgotovki farmacevtov – menedzherov. Farmacija Kazahstana, 4, 43–44.

Val', E. V. (2001). Innovacionnaja model' povedenija rabotnikov farmacevticheskogo profilja. Jekonomicheskij vestnik farmacii, 12, 37–41.

Kulinikova, N. (2005). Nauchnoe obosnovanie metodicheskih podhodov k racional'nomu ispol'zovaniju kadrovyh resursov aptechnyh organizacij v uslovijah konkurentnoj sredy. Tjumen', 20.

Lipen', L. I. (2010). Kadry v zdravoohranenii, farmacii i sisteme social'noj zashhity. Obrazcy dolzhnostnyh instrukcij. Kvalifikacionnye harakteristiki. Dikta, 292.

Mihajlov, Ju. M. (2010). Samye vostrebovannye dolzhnostnye instrukcii. Al'fa – Press, 936.

Kadif, Ju. L. (2010). Kak pravil'no i bystro razrabotat' dolzhnostnye instrukcii. Obrazcy instrukcij. Al'fa – Press, 112.

Published

2015-11-29

Issue

Section

Pharmaceutical Sciences