Investigation of mentality of urban environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2018.127517

Keywords:

urban environment, spirituality of the environment, mentality, the spirit of the nation, folklore, memory of the nation

Abstract

In the scientific study, the mentality of the urban environment is considered as a phenomenon. Mentality of the environment is represented by the informational-semiotic layer of the urban environment, which is an integral part of the spirit of the nation, the ethnos. The correlation and mutual completeness of the mentality of the urban environment and the mentality of the nation has been revealed.

As a result of scientific research, a new concept is introduced into the architectural and town-planning activity - the mentally-toponymic support plan of the territory

Author Biographies

Ganna Arzili, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture Povitroflotsky ave. 31, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03037

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Urban Development

Mykola Dyomin, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture Povitroflotsky ave. 31, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03037

Doctor of Architecture, Professor, Head of the Department

Department of Urban Development

References

Mosendz (Arzili), A. Yu. (2012). Evolyuciya izomorfnosti arhitekturnoy leksiki. Naukovyi visnyk budivnytstva, 67, 24–27.

Mosendz (Arzili), A. Yu. (2013). Ponyatiyniy status koncepta «Genius loci» i ego rol' v formirovanii gorodskoy sredy. Sovremennye problemy arhitektury i gradostroitel'stva, 33, 248–252.

Brunov, N. I. (1988). Hram Vasiliya Blazhennogo v Moskve. Pokrovskiy sobor. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 252.

Ikonnikov A. V. (1990). Tysyacha let russkoy arhitektury. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 60.

Levinson, A. G. (1975). Semantika gorodskoy sredy. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo, 9, 33–35.

Antonov, V. L. (2005). Kompoziciya gorodskoy sredy (metodologicheskie problemy sistemnogo podhoda). Kyiv – Kharkiv – Simferopol'.

Puchkov, A. A. (1998). Paradoks antichnosti. Princip hudozhestvenno-plasticheskoy telesnosti antichnoy arhitektury. Kyiv: NIITIAG, 288, 303.

Vagner, G. K. (1988). Drevnerusskiy ansambl' kak obraz mira. Iskusstvo ansamblya. Hudozhestvennyy predmet, inter'er, arhitektura, sreda. Moscow: Izobrazitel'noe iskusstvo, 97–139.

Barabanov, A. Chelovek i arhitektura: Semantika otnosheniy. Available at: http://gnozis.info

Linch, K. (1982). Obraz goroda. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 328.

Toporov, V. N. (1995). Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz. Issledovaniya v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo. Moscow: Progress – Kul'tura, 4.

Puchkov, A. A. (1997). Gabrichevskiy. Koncepciya arhitekturnogo organizma v myslitel'nom processe 20–30-h godov. Kyiv: Izdatel'skiy dom A.S.S., 123.

Tuan, Y.-F. (1975). Images and mental maps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 65 (2), 205–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1975.tb01031.x

Veselkova, N. V. (2010). Mental'nye karty goroda: voprosy metodologii i praktika ispol'zovaniya. Sociologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie, 31, 10.

Plaut, D. C. (2001). Cognitive Maps. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2120–2124.

Milgram, S. (2000). Eksperiment v social'noy psihologii. Sankt-Pererburg: Piter, 97.

Published

2018-04-02

Issue

Section

Architecture