Development formalization of the e-learning pedagogical scenario

Authors

  • Олександр Іванович Пушкар Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics Nauky ave., 9-a, Kharkіv, Ukraine, 61166, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3592-3684
  • Вячеслав Вячеславович Браткевич Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics Nauky ave., 9-a, Kharkіv, Ukraine, 61166, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7217-7767
  • Ірина Володимирівна Литовченко Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics Nauky ave., 9-a, Kharkіv, Ukraine, 61166, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8117-1244

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2016.80472

Keywords:

e-learning system, pedagogical scenario, individual trajectory, search formalization, evaluation criteria

Abstract

The place of the pedagogical scenario in development of the e-learning support system has been defined. The process of student's interaction with the system of e-learning in the form of a proper dialogue has been proposed. Peculiarities of constructing typical models of scenarios of academic disciplines have been analyzed. A technique for quantitative assessment of the relationships between the objects of study in the model of a pedagogical scenario has been offered

Author Biographies

Олександр Іванович Пушкар, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics Nauky ave., 9-a, Kharkіv, Ukraine, 61166

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Computer Systems and Technologies

Вячеслав Вячеславович Браткевич, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics Nauky ave., 9-a, Kharkіv, Ukraine, 61166

Ph.D., professor

Department of Computer Systems and Technologies

Ірина Володимирівна Литовченко, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics Nauky ave., 9-a, Kharkіv, Ukraine, 61166

Ph.D.

Department of Personnel Management and Labour Economics

References

Pushkar, O. (2004). Organisation of Training Environment Basing on Training Support System Local Identity – Global Awareness. 33-d International Symposium IGIP/IEEE/ASEE. Fribourg (Switzerland), 473–476.

Zaitseva, L. V. (2003). Methods and adapt the model to the students in the computer-based training systems. Educational Technology & Society, 6 (4), 204–211.

Zaitseva, L. V., Buhl, E. E. (2006). Adapting computer systems based on the structuring of training facilities. Training technology and society, 9 (1), 22–27.

Dorzhiev, Z. Z. (2004). Development guidelines for prima pared automated training system (AOS) on descriptive geometry in the learning process. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo VSGTU, 72.

Coogee, S. A., Tsvetkov, Y. I. (2014). Information educational unit. Distance and virtual learning, 1, 24–31.

Popov, E. (Ed.) (1990). Artificial Intelligence. Moscow, 384.

Bel'kov, S. A. (2014). The components of the concept of «Teaching scenario». New obrazovat-flax technology in high school. Ekaterinburg. Available at: http://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/24737/1/notv-2014-021.pdf

Saaty, T. L.; Andreychikov, A. V., Andreichikova, O. N. (Eds.) (2008). Decision making at the dependencies and feedbacks: Analytical network. Moscow: Izdatelstvo LKI, 360.

Krechetnikov, K. G. (2005). Teaching design and its importance for the development of information educational technologies. ITO. Available at: http://ito.edu.ru/2005/Troitsk/2/2-0-9.html

Gyra, V. V. (2007). Theoretical bases of pedagogical designing student-centered electronic educational resources and media. Rostov-on-Don: Publ Southern Federal University, 320.

Uvarov, A. Y. (2003). Teaching design. Computer science, 30, 2–31.

Petrov, A., Yaroshevsky, M. (Eds.) (1990). Psychology. Moscow: Politizdat, 480.

Concise Dictionary Pedagogical propagandist (1984). Moscow: Izd watered. Lit., 372.

Published

2016-10-30

Issue

Section

Technical Sciences