Methodological aspects for the preparation of future teachers of fine arts

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2019.161529

Keywords:

future teacher of fine arts, professional readiness, professional competence, approaches to training

Abstract

The article reveals methodological principles for the preparation of future teachers of fine arts for individual pedagogical activity. It was demonstrated, that the preparation should be carried out on the basis of a system, competence, integration, creativity and activity approach. A substantiation of concepts from the above-mentioned approaches in the preparation of future teachers of fine arts was made, which consideration should contribute to innovative alterations in the general education system of specialists in the field of fine arts in higher education institutions.

The system approach is considered by the authors as a purposeful and clearly organized method to achieve the determined goal. It envisages a combined consecutive work of students and teachers, managing the educative process, it ensures the integrity, efficiency and resulting quality of the educational process, creating conditions for future teachers to achieve a combination of new qualities, necessary in an individual professional occupation.

The competence oriented approach is defined by the authors as a shaped individual quality of a future teacher of fine arts, specifying the extent of his or her knowledge and qualification. The introduction of the competence approach envisages the deposition of cognitive accents of students’ readiness for independent work to competent accents, which are based on value priorities of a person, particularities of his or her experience and beliefs, and ensures the readiness for creative and productive individual work.

The integration approach envisages the alteration of accents in the construction of the pedagogical process from a subject-centric structure to a poly-centric one, by overcoming disunity, fragmentation of professional knowledge, differentiated according to different academic disciplines, and contributes to the creation of an integral thinking style.

The creativity approach envisages depriving the educational process in higher education institutions from patterns and standards, as well as giving preference to an active search for non-standard solutions, methods, forms, approaches for improving the education of students in order to achieve a higher professional level.

The introduction of the activity approach, where the teacher is considered not as a “translator”, but as a coordinator for students in methods of obtaining and digesting new information, by assisting the students to get involved in different forms of creative artistic and pedagogical occupation, which demonstrates their activity as an universal “instrument” of self-fulfillment of the artistic and creative potential, which ensures the readiness formation for an active life position and a continuous education during the whole life

Author Biographies

Halyna Sotska, Ivan Zyazun Institute for Pedagogical Education and Adult Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine M. Berlinskoho str., 9, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04060

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Senior Researcher

Halyna Kuzmenko, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University Bulvarno-Kudriavska str., 18/2, Ukraine, Kyiv, 04053

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Fine Art

References

  1. Pichkur, M., Semenova, O. (2015). Udoskonalennia zmistu ta metodyky vykladannia kompozytsii v systemi profesiinoi pidhotovky vchytelia obrazotvorchoho mystetstva [Improvement of the content and methods of teaching composition in the system of professional training of the teacher of fine arts]. Problems of preparing a modern teacher: a collection of scientific works of the Uman State Pedagogical University named after Pavlo Tychyna, 12 (2), 72–79.
  2. Muzyka, O. (2015). Dialohichnist i spivtvorchist u pedahohichnomu protsesi yak chynnyk formuvannia tvorchoi osobystosti khudozhnyka-pedahoha v systemi vyshchoi osvity [Improvement of the content and methods of teaching composition in the system of professional training of the teacher of fine arts]. Problems of preparing a modern teacher: a collection of scientific works of the Uman State Pedagogical University named after Pavlo Tychyna, 12 (2), 64–72.
  3. Paydukov, P. V., Paydukov, A. V., Paydukov, D. V. (2015). Vedushhie professional'nye kompetentsii v soderzhanii professional'noy kompetentnosti budushhego uchitelya izobrazitel'nogo iskusstva [Leading professional competences in the content of professional competence of the future teacher of fine arts]. Modern problems of science and education, 6. Available at: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=23918 Last accessed: 17.03.2019
  4. Pokrovshhuk, L. M. (2006). Hotovnist vykladachiv khudozhno-hrafichnykh fakultetiv do rozvytku tvorchykh zdibnostei studentiv v umovakh zastosuvannia kompiuternykh tekhnolohii [Readiness of teachers of art and graphic faculties to develop creative abilities of students in terms of application of computer technologies]. Collection of scientific works. Pedagogical sciences, 42, 369–373.
  5. Tyler, C. W., Likova, L. T. (2012). The Role of the Visual Arts in the Enhancing the Learning Process. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00008
  6. Robynson, K. (2013). Obrazovanie protiv talanta [Education against talent]. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, Eksmo, 336.
  7. Gavric, G. (2015). Theoretical and practical aspects of teaching methods from the faculty of fine and applied arts. Metodički obzori/Methodological Horizons, 10 (1), 12–20. doi: http://doi.org/10.32728/mo.10.1.2015.02
  8. Bazylchuk, L. V. (2014). Pidhotovka maibutnikh uchyteliv obrazotvorchoho mystetstva do orhanizatsii pozaklasnoi roboty v zahalnoosvitnikh shkolakh: monohrafiia. Uman: Vizavi, 287.
  9. Shchurkova, N. E. (2005). Pedagogicheskaya tekhnologiya [Pedagogical technology]. Moscow: Pedahohycheskoe obshchestvo Rossyy, 256.
  10. Ordanovska, O. I. (2012). Kontseptsiia pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv fizyko-matematychnykh dystsyplin profilnoi shkoly. Narodna osvita, 2 (17). Available at: https://www.narodnaosvita.kiev.ua/Narodna_osvita/vupysku/17/statti/ordanovska.htm Last accessed: 22.01.2019
  11. Kodzhaspirova, G. M., Kodzhaspirov, A. Yu. (2001). Pedagogicheskiy slovar [Pedagogical dictionary]. Moscow, 176.
  12. Kuzmenko, H. V. (2016). Model pidhotovky maibutnikh uchyteliv obrazotvorchoho mystetstva do orhanizatsii khudozhno-tvorchoi diialnosti uchniv osnovnoi shkoly. Vіsnik Chernigіv. un-tu. Seriya: Pedagogical sciences, 135, 189–192.
  13. Kondakov, N. І. (1975). Logicheskiy slovar'-spravochnik [Logical dictionary reference]. Moscow, 720.
  14. Sotska, G. I. (2011). Teoretychni ta metodychni zasady formuvannia estetychnoi kultury maibutnoho vchytelia obrazotvorchoho mystetstva [Theoretical and methodical ambush of form-setting of a natural culture of the mayor of the imaginative mystical culture]. Modern informacion technologies and innovative methods of training in production software: methodology, theory, research, problems, 28, 472–477.
  15. Kondrashova, L. V. (2009). Professsional'noe stanovlenie studenta v usloviyakh kreativnogo podkhodu k organizatsii obrazovatel'nogo protsessa vysshey pedagogicheskoy shkoly. Professional formation of the person: problems and prospects. Khmelnitsky, 101–105.

Published

2019-03-29

How to Cite

Sotska, H., & Kuzmenko, H. (2019). Methodological aspects for the preparation of future teachers of fine arts. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (2 (29), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2019.161529

Issue

Section

Pedagogical Education