Experience of teachers of kherson province in second half of XXI – early XX century in the context of art education development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2016.70203

Keywords:

pedagogical activity, art education, esthetic education, national creation, graphic grammar

Abstract

The modern problems of art education development in educational institutions are familiar to the ones that were solved in the second part of ХІХ – early ХХ centuries. The necessity of creative generalization of historical native experience of the teachers of the past causes the interest to studying the scientific and creative contribution of the famous native scientists, theorists and practicians in the art education development. In the article author aims at the elucidation of the experience of the teachers from the Kherson region of the second half of ХІХ – early ХХ centuries as the background of improvement of art education in the modern socio-cultural conditions. By the way of retrospective analysis of archival and scientific sources the node personalities of art education of South of Ukraine were defined; their methodical approaches to the art education were defined. As the result of analysis of the works of the teachers of Kherson province were learned persons who disseminated the ideas that had the progressive impact on the pedagogical thought development of the end of ХІХ – early ХХ century: I. Derkachev, M. Korf, M. Lange, O. Muzichenko, M. Pirogov, Y. Chepiga and the others. The contribution of each person in the art education development of the South of Ukraine of the aforesaid period was defined. It was established that scientists who proved the necessity of reformation of the school education paid attention to the fact that art education of the child is the obligatory component of educational process and the knowledge of graphic grammar helps to the pupils to understand the surrounding world better, favors the intensive development of thinking, develops the esthetic taste. The scientists paid attention to the necessity of art education as the component of educational process and the knowledge of graphic grammar helps to the pupils to understand the surrounding world better, favors the intensive development of thinking, develops the esthetic taste. The author proves that Ukraine has some experience of organization of art education that favors the critical understanding and creative use of heritage of progressive native teachers-artists

Author Biography

Зоя Владиславівна Гуріч, Institute of Pedagogical and Adult Education NAPS of Ukraine 9 M. Berlin str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 04060

Member of the National Union of Artists of Ukraine

Department of detention and adult learning techniques

References

  1. Ziaziun, I. A.; Zjazjun, I. A., Radkevych, V. O., Chepurna, N. M. et. al (Eds.) (2007). Intehratyvna funktsiia kultury v informatsiinomu suspilstvi [Integrative function of culture in the information society]. Profesiino-khudozhnia osvita Ukrainy – Professional and art education of Ukraine. Kyiv; Cherkasy: Cherkaskyi TsNTEI, IV, 3–12.
  2. Masol, L. M. (2006). Zahalna mystetska osvita: teoriia i praktyka [General art education]. Kyiv: Promin, 432.
  3. Padalka, H. M. (2008). Pedahohika mystetstva (Teoriia i metodyka vykladannia mystetskykh dystsyplin) [Art Pedagogy (Theory and methods of teaching art subjects)]. Kyiv: Osvita Ukrainy, 274.
  4. Sapak, N. V. (2006). Khudozhnie zhyttia Pivdnia Ukrainy kintsia XIX – pershoi tretyny XX stolittia [Art life of southern Ukraine in late XIX – the first third of the XX century]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv, 23.
  5. Forostian, A. F. (2009). Rozvytok estetychnoho vykhovannia v serednikh navchalnykh zakladakh osvity Pivdnia Ukrainy (druha polovyna XIX – pochatok XX stolittia) [The development of aesthetic education in secondary schools of South Ukraine (the second half of the XIX – early XX century)]. Kyiv, 159.
  6. Shushliannikova, N. V. (2003). Rozpovidi z istorii Khersonskoho kraiu [The stories from the history of Kherson land]. Kherson: KSU, 207.
  7. Malynina, I. O. (2005). Pidhotovka pedahohichnykh kadriv u Kharkivskii ta Kyivskyi khudozhnikh shkolakh Ukrainy (druha polovyna XIX – pochatok XX st.) [Training of teaching staff in Kharkiv and Kyiv art schools of Ukraine (the second half of the XIX – XX centuries)]. Kharkiv, 221.
  8. Krasiuk, I. O. (2012). Narysy z istorii rozvytku khudozhnoi osvity v Ukraini v XIX – na pochatku XX st. [Essays from history of development art education in Ukraine in the XIX – early XX century]. Kryvyi Rih, 223.
  9. Shmagalo, R., Pokotylo, G., Ljashkevych, P., Gnatyshyn, I., Bej, T.; Shmagala, R. (Ed.) (2013). Mystetska osvita y mystetstvo v kulturotvorchomu protsesi Ukrainy XX – XXI stolit [Art Education and Art in culture creating process in Ukraine during the XX – XXI century]. Lviv: LNAM; Ternopil: Mandrivets, 292.
  10. Pirogov, N. I. (1985). Voprosy zhizni [Issues of life]. Yzb. ped. sochynenyja. Moscow: Pedagogika, 29–51.
  11. Dorofeyev, G. K. (1897). O postanovke vneklassnogo chteniya i literaturnykh besed v srednikh uchebnykh zavedeniyakh [About setting of extracurricular reading and literary talks in secondary schools]. Odessa, 100.
  12. Konorskaya, M. N. (1901). Detskiy teatr. ego vred i polza [Children's theater, its harm and benefits]. Sankt-Petersburg, 16.
  13. Borisov, N. I. (1896). Voprosy shkolnoy statistiki [Issues of of school statistics]. Kherson: tip. Khodushinoy O. D., 14.
  14. Kapranova, V. A. (2013). Korf Nikolay Aleksandrovich (1834–1883): [russkiy pedagog. metodist. deyatel narodnogo obrazovaniya] [Korf N. A. (1834–1883): [russian teacher, methodist, public education activist]. Istoriya pedagogiki v litsakh. Minsk; Moscow, Russia: Novoye znaniye: INFRA-M, 119–120.
  15. Myronenko, V. V. (2011). Rol I. P. Derkachova v orhanizatsii pershykh zizdiv narodnykh vchyteliv v m. Simferopoli v kintsi XIX stolittia [The role of I. P. Derkachov in organizing the first Congress of People Teachers in Simferopol in the late XIX century]. Istoriia osvity i pedahohichnoi dumky. Visnyk SevNTU. Sevastopol, 124, 206–211.
  16. Zhurakovskiy, G. E. (1976). Iz istorii prosveshcheniya v dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii [From the history of education in pre-revolutionary Russia]. Moscow: Pedagogika, 160.
  17. Myronenko, V. V. (2011). Vykhovannia dbailyvoho stavlennia do pryrody u pedahohichnii spadshchyni I. P. Derkachova (1834–1916) [Education of respect attitude to the nature of the pedagogical heritage of I. P. Derkachov (1834–1916)]. Istoryko-pedagogichnyj al'manah. Uman, I, 26–29.
  18. Istoriia Odeskoho universytetu za 100 rokiv[History of Odessa University for 100 years] (1968). Kyiv, 382–408.
  19. Otchet 2-y gorodskoy Odesskoy zhenskoy gimnazii za 1904–1905 god, s programmami na uchebnyy god [Report of the 2nd Odessa city girls' school for the 1904–1905 year, with programs for the academic year]. State archive of Odessa region. F. 47. Op. 1. Spr. 5670.
  20. Yakiv Feofanovych Chepiha (Zelenkevych) – vydatnyi pedahoh, psykholoh, hromadskyi diiach [Yakiv Feofanovych Chepiha (Zelenkevych) – outstanding educator, psychologist, social activist] (2013). Kyiv, 135.
  21. Chepiha, Ya. (1910). Natsionalnist i natsionalna shkola [Nationality and national school]. Svitlo, 1, 16–29.
  22. Nikolenko, L. T. (2000). Teoretychni zasady navchannia i vykhovannia molodshykh shkoliariv u pedahohichnii spadshchyni Ya. F. Chepihy [The theoretical basis of training and education of primary school children in the pedagogical heritage of Ya. F. Chepiga]. Kyiv, 15.
  23. Muzychenko, A. F. (1903). Tvorchestvo uchenikov zemskikh shkol [Creative work of Zemstvo school students]. Odessa, 144.
  24. Trynus, O. V. (2012). Muzychenko pro holovni pryntsypy navchannia [Muzichenko about the main principles of learning]. Vytoky pedagogichnoi' majsternosti, 9, 299–303.
  25. Muzychenko, O. F. (1919). Suchasni pedahohichni techii v Zakhidnii Yevropi i Amerytsi [Modern pedagogical trends in Western Europe and America]. Kyiv, 109.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-31

How to Cite

Гуріч, З. В. (2016). Experience of teachers of kherson province in second half of XXI – early XX century in the context of art education development. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (5 (1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2016.70203

Issue

No. 5 (1) (2016)

Section

Pedagogical Education

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Зоя Владиславівна Гуріч

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.