Efficiency analysis of ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy

Authors

  • Inna Petrashenko State Institution "Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine" V. Vernadskogo str., 9, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-2525
  • Tetiana Loskutova State Institution "Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine" V. Vernadskogo str., 9, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9844-5520

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2020.198918

Keywords:

pregnancy, acute appendicitis, ultrasound diagnostics

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify ultrasound signs of various forms of the acute appendicitis and to study the efficiency of the ultrasound method in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women.

Materials and methods. 73 pregnant women (group I) and 43 non-pregnant women (group II) were examined with suspicion of acute appendicitis. The age of patients ranged from 18 to 40 years, on average – 25.7± 0.5 years. Gestational age was from 4–5 to 35–36 weeks. The informational content of sonography was studied by following criteria: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and efficiency.

Results and discussion. An analysis of the results of informational content showed that the diagnostic significance of ultrasound by the third trimester of gestation is decreased which is probably due to the increased size of the uterus and the appearance of acoustic difficulties. Sensitivity, accuracy and efficiency were higher in the first trimester in contrast with second and third trimesters. In group II, higher values of informative indices were noted than in women of group I. There is an increase: sensitivity by 27.3 %, accuracy by 25.2 % and diagnostic efficiency by 14.7 %.

Conclusions. Ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy especially at the end of II and III trimesters is a definite problem points to the advantages of an integrated approach to the diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy comparing the clinical manifestations of the disease with the results of diagnostic research methods

Author Biographies

Inna Petrashenko, State Institution "Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine" V. Vernadskogo str., 9, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49044

PhD, Assistant Professor

Department of Surgery No. 2

Tetiana Loskutova, State Institution "Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine" V. Vernadskogo str., 9, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49044

MD, Professor

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

References

  1. Khatsko, V. V., Gredzhev, F. A., Parkhov, A. V., Potapov, V. V. (2014). Ostryi appenditsit u beremennykh (nauchnyi obzor). Ukrainskii zhurnal khirurgii, 1, 154–157.
  2. Chichom Mefire, A., Tchounzou, R., Kuwong, P. M., Atangana, J. P. A., Lysinge, A. C., Malonga, E. E. (2011). Clinical, Ultrasonographic, and Pathologic Characteristics of Patients with Chronic Right-lower-quadrant Abdominal Pain that May Benefit from Appendectomy. World Journal of Surgery, 35 (4), 723–730. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-0980-3
  3. Zhuravlev, I. A., Nuriyeva, A. R., Mamedova, O. K., Farahutdynov, A. A. (2015). Diagnosis and the treatment of acute appendicitis the pregnant females. Vestnik Bashkirskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta. Prilozhenie, 2, 780–785.
  4. Strizhakov, A. N., Chernousov, A. F., Rybin, M. V., Samoylova, Y. A. (2010). Рregnancy Acute and appendicitis. Vestnik khirurgicheskoi gastroenterologii, 3, 4–16.
  5. Kumamoto, K., Imaizumi, H., Hokama, N., Ishiguro, T., Ishibashi, K., Baba, K. et. al. (2015). Recent trend of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Surgery Today, 45 (12), 1521–1526. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1139-x
  6. Dobrokvashin, S. V., Izmailov, A. G., Volkov, D. E., Demianov, S. L. (2013). Diagnostic algoritm of the acute appendioitis at pregnant women. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi meditsiny, 6 (5), 83–85.
  7. Amelchenia, O. A. (2012). Ostryi appenditsit u beremennykh. Vostochnaia Evropa, 2, 139–152.
  8. Lehnert, B. E., Gross, J. A., Linnau, K. F., Moshiri, M. (2012). Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emergency Radiology, 19 (4), 293–299. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1029-0
  9. Wallace, C. A., Petrov, M. S., Soybel, D. I., Ferzoco, S. J., Ashley, S. W., Tavakkolizadeh, A. (2007). Influence of Imaging on the Negative Appendectomy Rate in Pregnancy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 12 (1), 46–50. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0377-7
  10. Sezer, T. O., Gulece, B., Zalluhoglu, N. et. al. (2012). Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in appendicitis. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 21 (5), 633–636.
  11. Zhilina, N. M. (2007). Primenenie metodov obrabotki dannykh v meditsinskikh issledovaniiakh: metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Novokuznetsk: GOU DPO «NGIUV» Roszdrava, 44.
  12. Lapach, S. N., Chubenko, A. V., Babych, P. N. (2001). Statystycheskye metodi v medyko-byolohycheskykh yssledovanyiakh s yspolzovanyem Excel. Kyiv: Myryon, 408.

Published

2020-04-01

How to Cite

Petrashenko, I., & Loskutova, T. (2020). Efficiency analysis of ultrasound diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. ScienceRise: Medical Science, (2 (35), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2020.198918

Issue

Section

Medical Science