The results of using endoprosthesis in reconstructive-plactic surgery of breast cancer

Authors

  • Юрий Алексеевич Винник Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education 58 Amosov str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176, Ukraine
  • Светлана Александровна Фомина Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education 58 Amosov str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176, Ukraine
  • Анастасия Юрьевна Гринева Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education 58 Amosov str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2016.70187

Keywords:

tumor process stages, endoprostheses, breast cancer, reconstructive-plastic operations, survivability

Abstract

Aim of research: the study of the remote results of breast reconstruction using endoprosthesis simultaneously with the surgical stage of combined and complex treatment of patients with BC.

Materials and methods. 32 patients with BC who underwent the complex and combined treatment in the period 2012–2015 on the base of MIHP “Kharkiv regional clinical oncologic center” were under observation. At this study the given group of patients underwent hypodermic mastectomy with NAC kept and using silicone endoprosthesis as breast reconstruction. The largest group included women at the social active age 30–49 years old (66,7 %). The mean age of patients was 39,3 years old. The number of patients at the age of 60–69 years old was significantly less – 6,2 % (2 patients) of cases. The menstrual function on the whole was kept in 21 (65,6 %) patients and was absent for up to 5 years in 7 (21,8 %) patients and for more than 5 years in 4 (12,6 %) patients with BC.

Results of research. At analysis of the results of research was established that the studied variant of reconstructive-plastic operative intervention in combination with hypodermic mastectomy with NAC kept as the surgical stage of combined and complex treatment of patients with BC has no essential effect on its remote results. The indices of both general survivability and the one without relapse depended only on the prognostic factors commonly acknowledged for this disease.

Conclusions

1. The reconstructive-plastic operative intervention using endoprostheses simultaneously with hypodermic mastectomy with NAC kept does not worsen the remote results of neither combined nor complex treatment of patients with BC.
2. On the base of research was established the absence of influence of breast reconstruction on the increase of local relapses and remote metastases: 9,4 % and 6,2 % respectively

Author Biographies

Юрий Алексеевич Винник, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education 58 Amosov str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

MD, Professor, Head of Department

Department of cancer surgery

Светлана Александровна Фомина, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education 58 Amosov str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

Assistant

Major cancer surgery

Анастасия Юрьевна Гринева, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education 58 Amosov str., Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

Assistant

Department of Oncology and Pediatric Oncology

References

  1. Blohin, S. N. (1997). Pervichnye plasticheskie operacii v hirurgii raka molochnoj zhelezy. Annaly plasticheskoj, rekonstruktivnoj i jesteticheskoj hirurgii, 3, 59–63.
  2. Lindley, C., Vasa, S., Sawyer, W. et. al (2014). Quality of life and preferences for treatment following systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. – 2014. – Vol. 23. – P. 56–59.
  3. Borovikov, A. M. (2000). Vosstanovlenie grudi posle mastjektomii. Tver': Izdatel'stvo OOO «Gubernskaja medicina», 5.
  4. Levy, S., Haynes, L., Herberman, R. et al. (2002). Mastectomy versus breast conservation survey: Mental health effects at long-term follow-up. Health Psychol, 40, 341–351.
  5. Bazhenova, A. P., Barvitenko, P. G. (2011). Ocenka jeffektivnosti terapii operabel'nogo raka molochnoj zhelezy. Voprosy onkologii, 24 (11), 65–70.
  6. Gorbunova, V. A., Breder, V. V. (2013). Kachestvo zhizni onkologicheskih bol'nyh. Voprosy onkologii, 1 (1), 34–40.
  7. Aseev, A. V., Vasjutkov, V. Ja., Murasheva, Je. M. (2010). Psihologicheskie izmenenija u zhenshhin, bol'nyh rakom molochnoj zhelezy. Mammologija, 3, 14–16.
  8. Malygin, S. E. (2002). Sovremennye onkologicheskie principy rekonstrukcii molochnoj zhelezy. Tretij mezhdunarodnyj kongress po plasticheskoj, rekonstruktivnoj i jesteticheskoj hirurgii. Moscow, 94–95.
  9. Goodyear, M. D. E., Fraumeni, M. (2006). Incorporating quality of life assessment in to clinical cancer trials. Lippincott-Raven Publishers: Philadelphia, New York, 234.
  10. Irwing, L. (2014). Quality of life after breast cconcervation or mastectomy: a systematic review. Surg, 6, 347–351.
  11. Lee, H. (2007). Quality of life and breast cancer survivors. Psychosocial and treatment issues. Cancer Pract, 5, 309–316.
  12. Toth, B. A., Lappert, P. (1991). Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 87 (6), 1048–1053. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199106000-00006

Downloads

Published

2016-05-31

How to Cite

Винник, Ю. А., Фомина, С. А., & Гринева, А. Ю. (2016). The results of using endoprosthesis in reconstructive-plactic surgery of breast cancer. ScienceRise: Medical Science, (5 (1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4798.2016.70187

Issue

No. 5 (1) (2016)

Section

Medical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Юрий Алексеевич Винник, Светлана Александровна Фомина, Анастасия Юрьевна Гринева

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.