SOCIAL WORK AS A MULTIMODAL SYSTEM FOR ASSISTANCE AND SUPPORT IN TRANSITIONAL SOCIETY
It is necessary to point out the significant number of studies devoted to the characteristics of a transitional society, its features, in the discourse of modernization and transformation processes, as well as in the socio-philosophical aspect.
The author presents the essence of the social sphere and social policy as a system of vital functions of society and its components, where it is expedient to include social work. Social work is naturally associated with changes in social relations and the life of man and society, is a key tool in the implementation of the most important areas of state social policy. It is social work that ensures adherence to the principle of social justice by providing various types of social support to vulnerable groups of the population and reducing the exclusion and is a priority integrated mechanism for the practical implementation of the main tasks of social policy implementation.
Analysis of the definition of «transitivity» and «transition» allowed highlighting the characteristics of the interpretations: as a transition, the gap between the states of social development; as uncertainty and multidimensional variants of socio-economic changes; as the newest form of socio-economic relations. Both negative and positive features of a transitiional society are singled out.
It is proved that the effectiveness of the system of social work in these conditions will significantly increase if you apply the principle of multimodality, which allows you to combine different means of achieving the goal. Introduction of this multimodal social work system is possible taking into account certain conditions and observance of a clear implementation algorithm, where human capital plays a major role.
Abakumova, V. I. (2014). The methodology of the study of changing periods of history. Historical studios of social progress, (2), 27-31. [in Ukrainian].
Agranovich, V. B. (2005). Transitive period of society development and quality of educational processes. Engineering Education, (3), 158-163. [In Russian].
Alexander, J. (1988). Action and Its Environments: Toward a New Synthesis New York: Columbia University Press.
Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge.
Babenko, S. S. (2004). Sociocultural potential of transformation of post-Soviet society: abstract. diss. ... PhD in Sociology: Special. 22.00.01. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv. 25. [in Ukrainian].
Balanovsky, Y. (2018). The phenomenon of social transitivity is a factor in the temporal marginality of society. Scientific Notes of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies, (7), 289-297. [in Ukrainian].
Belska, T.V. (2010). Relations between Public Authorities and Civil Society Institutions in Democratic Transit: Abstract. diss. ... cand. of sciences public administration spec. 25.00.01. Kharkiv Regional Institute of Public Administration. National Academy of Public Administration attached to the Office of the President of Ukraine. Kharkiv, 19. [in Ukrainian].
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge, 333.
Bronstein, L. R., (2003). A Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration. ACSW Social Work, 48(3), 297-306.
Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. New York: Prentice Hall.
Campos, N., & Coricelli, F. (2002). Growth in Transition: What We Know, What We Don't, and What We Should. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(3), 793-780. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3217110
Ceraso, S. (2018). Sounding Composition: Multimodal Pedagogies for Embodied Listening. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Cohen, B.J. (2011). Evidence-based practice (EBP) Design-based Practice: A New Perspective for Social Work. Social Work, 56(4), 337-346.
Fedotova, M. G. (2010). Towards the content of the concept of "transitive society". Social Philosophy, 28-31. [In Russian].
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: University of California Press, 402.
Glinskaya, G. S. (2014). Transitivity of socio-political organization: general theoretical aspect. Materials of the X International scientific and practical conference. “Trends of modern science”. Political science. Sheffield. Science and education LTD, (10), 64. [In Russian].
Greif, G. L. & Lynch A. A. (1983). The eco-systems perspective. Clinical Social Work in the eco-systems Perspective. New York. Columbia University Press.
State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (Number of legal entities by organizational forms, 2019). Retrieved from: https://ukrstat.org/uk/edrpoy/ukr/EDRPU2019/ks_ opfg/ks_opfg_0619.htm [in Ukrainian].
Kalashnikova, T. M. (2015). Provision of territorially localized benefits in the context of human development. Demography and Social Economics, (23), 102-112. [in Ukrainian].
Kane, R. (1988). Case management. Gentration, 12(5), 1-80.
Kataiev, S. L. (2006). Contemporary Ukrainian Society: school-book. K.: Center for Educational Literature, 200. [in Ukrainian].
Kemp, R., Loorbach, D. & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of coevolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(1), 78-91.
Khadka, S.&. Lee J. C. (2019). Bridging the Multimodal Gap: From Theory to Practice. University Press of Colorado.
Kibrick, A. A. (2010). Multimodal Linguistics. Retrieved from: http://ilingran.ru/kibrik/Multimodal@Cog_Studies_2010.pdf. [In Russian].
Kozlovets, M. (2017). Contemporary Ukrainian Society: The Discourse of Transitivity and the Phenomenology of Instability. The globalized world: the test of human being. Retrieved from: http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/25924/1/%D0% BA%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%86%D1%8C.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Lee. J. W. (2016). Social Work-Business Sector Collaboration in Pursuit of Economic. Social Work, 61(3), 209-216.
Lopushniak, G. S. (2011). State social policy as a prerequisite for the economic development of Ukraine: monograph. Lviv: LRIPAU NAPA. 372. [in Ukrainian].
Mattison, M. (2012). Social Work Practice in the Digital Age: Therapeutic E-Mail as a Direct Practice Methodology. Social Work, 57(3), 249-258.
Matveeva, L.G. (2015). Social transition as a factor of law-making. Visegrad Journal On Human Rights, (2), 131-138. [in Ukrainian].
Markovich, D. Z. (2006) Contradictions of the Transition of Post-Socialist Societies. Sociological studies, (9). 21-27. [In Russian].
Melnyk, L.A. (2015). Psychosocial assistance to internally displaced children, their parents and families with children from Eastern Ukraine: a guide. for social practitioners. K.: Kalita Publishing House LLC, 72. [in Ukrainian].
Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine. 2018 Social Report. Retrieved from: https://www.msp.gov.ua/news/17003.html. [in Ukrainian].
Moore, S. T. (1990). A social work practice model of case management: The case management grid. Social Work. 35, 385-480.
Murray, J. (2013). Multimodal Composition: A Critical Sourcebook. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 41-48.
Nesterenko, G. O. (2004). Personality in a Nonlinear Society: Monograph. Zaporizhya: Prosvita, 2004. 140. [in Ukrainian].
Nykolaieva, V. І. (2019). The social work system as an object of public administration. Public administration and management in Ukraine. (9), 57-61. [in Ukrainian].
Parsons, T. (1968). The Structure of Social Action. New York.
Petrakova, K. O. (2017). Theoretical and methodological analysis of the relationship between economy and politics in public administration. (Doctoral dissertation, spec. 25.00.01 - Theory and History of Public Administration). Kyiv, Institute for Training of Public Employment Service of Ukraine, 237. [in Ukrainian].
Pigida, V. M. (2013). A multidisciplinary approach to the implementation of social and pedagogical support for migrant children. Correctional and social pedagogy and psychology. Collection of Scientific Papers of Ivan Ogienko Kamianets-Podilskyi National University, 23 (3), 199-206. [in Ukrainian].
Pincus, A. & Minahan, A. (1973). Social Work Practice: Model and Method. Itasca.
Puras, D; Sumskiene, E., & Adomaityte-Subaciene, I. (2013). Challenges of prolonged transition from totalitarian system to liberal democracy. Social Policy & Social Work in Transition, 3(2), 31-54.
Roaf, J., Atoyan, R., Bikas, J., & Krogulski, K. (2014). 25 Years of Transition Post-Communist Europe and the IMF-Regional Economic Issues Special Report. International Monetary Fund, Publication Services, Washington, 5-7.
Semygina, T. (2018). Why is social work green? Herald of the Academy of Labor, Social Relations and Tourism, (1), 11-27. [in Ukrainian].
Sharyi B. (2012). Formation of a transitive paradigm of state policy implementation by local self-government bodies in Ukraine. Herald of the National Academy for Public Administration. Regional Governance and Local Self-Government, (2), 163-170. [in Ukrainian].
Shpatenko, S. A. (2008). The main directions of interaction of transitive societies: socio-philosophical analysis (on the example of Ukraine and Tajikistan): abstract diss. … cand. philosopher. sciences: Special. 09.00.03 The Ivan Kozhedub National Air Force University. Kharkiv, 23. [in Ukrainian].
Slozanska, H. I. (2018). Social work in the territorial community: Theories, models and methods: monograph / for sciences. ed. Dr. ped. of sciences, prof. V.A. Polishchuk. Ternopil: Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatyuk National Pedagogical Univercity, 275. [in Ukrainian].
Skurativskyi, V.A., Troshchinskyi, V.P., Sytnyk, P.K. Reforming Social Policy in Ukraine: Problems and Prospects : educational sciences. Kyiv; Lviv: NAPA. 368. [in Ukrainian].
Spiker P. (2000). Social policy: Themes and Approaches, Kyiv: Feniks. [in Ukrainian].
Strier, R. 92013). Responding to the Global Economic Crisis: Inclusive Social Work Practice. Social Work, 58(4), 344-353.
Sztompka, P. (1991) Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming. Cambridge, 1991.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1971). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Application. London, Alien Lane.
Weber, M. (1994). Favorites. About some categories of understanding sociology. M .: Lawyer, 702. [In Russian].
Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., van Steenbergen, F., & Loorbach, D. (2017). Actor roles in transition: Insights from sociological perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 45-56.
Zablotsky, V. P. & Burega, V. V. (2001). Society in Transition: The Ukrainian Context. Donetsk: Donetsk State University of Management, 170. [in Ukrainian].
Zin, E. A. (2007). Regional Economics: Textbook. Kyiv: Professional. [in Ukrainian].
Zhuk, O. B. (2017). Financial support for the implementation of the social policy of the state. (Doctoral dissertation, spec. 08.00.08 - money, finance and credit). Lviv, 295. [in Ukrainian].
Copyright (c) 2019 Valentyna Nykolaieva,, Svitlana Marova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.