PEDAGOGICAL INTERACTION OF THE TEACHERS OF THE ARTS COLLEGES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.19.1.8

Keywords:

communication, pedagogical communication, pedagogical interaction, partnership.

Abstract

The article reveals the significance of the concepts of "communication" and "pedagogical communication". The structure of pedagogical interaction, strategy and tactics is shown. The theoretical questions of relations of college teachers, which are carried out in the form of interaction and partnership, are considered. Indicates scientific approaches to the definition of the concept of "pedagogical communication". Communication is one of the main problems, through the prism, which studies questions of people's perception and understanding of each other. Communication helps to better understand the process of interpersonal interaction and interpersonal relationships. Interest in communication manifests representatives of different sciences, because it is a multidimensional and multilevel phenomenon. The existence of society can not be imagined outside the communication and interaction of people as its members with each other, so communication has always remained an object not only of everyday, but also of scientific attention. Communication is one of the universal realities of human existence, a specific kind and a necessary condition for its activity. The psychological climate in the pedagogical collective largely depends on the professional-pedagogical communication. Correctly organized professional and pedagogical communication not only provides an effective exchange of information, but also allows you to better know your colleague, to predict the features of further professional interaction. For successful communication, it is necessary to create conditions that would facilitate the self-actualization of the interlocutors and their productive cooperation. Further research, in our opinion, requires the issues of providing, organizing and regulating the relationship of professional and pedagogical communication of teachers of the college of artistic direction in the conditions of methodical work.

Author Biography

Vitaly Andreev, OKVNZ "Dnipropetrovsk Theater and Art College", Dnipro,

Ph.D. student of Departament of Pedagogy and Psychology, Alfred Nobel University. Methodist,

References

Бандурка, М., Тюріна В., Федоренко О. (2003). Основи психології і педагогіки: підручник. Харків. Видавництво Національного університету внутрішніх справ. (Bandurka, M. & Tyurina V., Fedorenko O. (2003). Fundamentals of Psychology and Pedagogy: Textbook. Kharkiv Publishing House of the National University of the Interior. [in Ukrainian]).

Ботвина, Н. В. (2000). Міжнародні культурні традиції: мова та етика ділового спілкування: навч. посіб. Київ: АртЕк. (Botvina, N. V. (2000). International cultural traditions: language and ethics of business communication. Kyiv: Artek. [in Ukrainian]).

Волкова, Н. П. (2002). Педагогіка: Посібник для студентів вищих навчальних закладів. Київ: Академія. (Volkova, N. P. (2003). Pedagogy: manual. Kyiv: Alma Mater. [in Ukrainian]).

Леонтьев, А. А. (1996). Педагогическое общение. М. К. Кабардова (Ред.). (2-е изд., перераб. и доп). Москва: Нальчик. (Leontev, A. A. (1996). Pedagogicheskoe obschenie [Pedagogical communication] (2nd ed., rev.). M. K. Kabardova (Ed.). Моskov: Nalchik [in Russian]).

Максименко, С. Д. (2004). Загальна психологія: навч. посіб. [2-ге вид., перероб. і доп.]. К.: Центр навчальної літератури. (Maksimenko, S. D. (2004). General Psychogy: Teachibg. vanual [2nd form., Processing. and add]. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature).

Олійник, К. С. (2014). Професійна етика та спілкування в соціальній роботі. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія: Педагогіка, соціальна робота. Вип. 33, 126-128. (Oliynyk, K. S. (2014). Professional Ethics and Communication in Social Work. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod National University. Series: Pedagogy, social work, 33, 126-128. [inUkrainian]).

Сайтарли, І. А. (2007). Культура міжособистісних стосунків: навч. посіб. Київ: Академвидав. 9 Sitari, I. A. (2007). Culture of interpersonal relations. Kyiv: Akademvidav. [in Ukrainian]).

Саннікова, О. П. (1995). Емоційність в структурі особистості. Одеса: Хорс. (Sannikova, O. P. (1995). Emotionality in the structure of the individual. Odessa: Horse. [in Ukrainian]).

Семенюк, О. А., Паращук В. Ю. (2010). Основи теорії мовної комунікації: Навч. посіб. Київ: ВЦ “Академія”. (Semeniuk, O. A. & Paraschuk V. Y. (2010). Fundamentals of the theory of language communication: a manual. Kyiv: Academy. [in Ukrainian]).

Чейка, Г. Л. (2005). Культура ділового спілкування менеджера: Навч. посіб. Київ: Знання. (Ceyka, G. L. (2005). Culture dіlovy spіlkuvannya manager: Navch. posib Kiev: Knowledge. [in Ukrainian]).

Mehrabian, A. (1972). Non-Verbal Communication. Chicago: Aldine.

Myer, G. E. & Myer M.T. (1980). The dynamics of human communication: a laboratory approach: New York.

Homans, G. C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Rev. ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Published

2019-03-30

How to Cite

Andreev, V. (2019). PEDAGOGICAL INTERACTION OF THE TEACHERS OF THE ARTS COLLEGES. Social Work and Education, 6(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.19.1.8

Issue

Section

RECENT ISSUES IN SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION