Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The aim of the journal "Technology audit and production reserves" is to publish research papers dealing with the search for opportunities to reduce costs and improve the competitiveness of products in industry. The peculiarity is that each problem is considered from two sides - the economist’s and the engineer’s, for example, in the context of forming the “price – quality” criterion, in which the first component concerns research in the field of business economics, and the second  engineering. The research result at the intersection of these disciplines can be used in the actual production to identify reserves, providing the opportunity to reduce costs and improve product competitiveness.

 

Section Policies

Mechanical Engineering Technology

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Mechanics

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Metallurgical Technology

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Materials Science

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Technology and System of Power Supply

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Alternative and Renewable Energy Sources

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Electrical engineering and industrial electronics

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Information technologies

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Mathematical modeling

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Systems and control processes

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Chemical and Technological Systems

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Measuring Methods in Chemical Industry

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Food Production Technology

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Ecology and Environmental Technology

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Economics and management of enterprise

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Development of the productive forces and regional economy

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Economic cybernetics

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Problems of macroeconomics and socio-economic development

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Reports on research projects

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The editorial board practices double-blind peer review. This process involves the following:

- First, the editors consider all manuscripts to assess their compliance with the journal subject matter and requirements.

- Following the decision of the editors, the manuscripts submitted are sent to at least two external experts in the corresponding field. The manuscript passes double-blind peer review, neither the authors nor the reviewers know each other.

- Reviewers' comments are transmitted to the authors, together with possible recommendations for the manuscript revision. The editor informs the authors, whether the manuscript is adopted without revision or authors are given the opportunity to review the manuscript and submit it again, or the manuscript is rejected.

 

Publication Frequency

The journal is published bimonthly.

Planning out the journal include:

- Submitting articles for publication in the next issue - before the 20th of every odd month.

- The publication of the article - before the 30th of the next (even) month.

Thus, the release of the numbers by months: February, April, June, August, October, December

 

Open Access Policy

"Technology Audit and Production Reserves" is an open access journal. All articles are free for users to access, read, download, and print.

 

Archiving

This journal uses LOCKSS system for distributed archiving published content in multiple libraries and information centers. Library - project LOCKSS ensure long-term storage of comprehensive log files and automatically restoring damaged information. More details...

 

Indexing

1. Index Copernicus Journals Master List (included in 2012)


2. 1findr


3. EBSCO (included in 2014)

 


4. OpenAIRE (included in 2012)


5. Scientific Periodicals of Ukraine (SPU VNLU) Producer: Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine Scientific Periodicals of Ukraine - project Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine (VNLU) (included in 2011)


6. Ulrich's Periodicals Directory (included in 2012) 

 


7. Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) (included in 2012)

 


8. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) (included in 2013)

 


9. WorldCat (included in 2013)


10. CrossRef (included in 2014)

 


11. WorldWideScience.org (included in 2015)

 


12. Scholar Article Journal Index (SAJI) (included in 2016)

 


13. CNKI Scholar (included in 2018)

 


14. Microsoft Academic Search (included in 2018)


15. Socionet (included in 2018)

 


16. Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB) (included in 2018)

17. EconBiz (included in 2018)

 


18. MIAR (Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals) (included in 2018)

 


19. Scilit (included in 2018)


20. EconPapers (included in 2019)

 


21. IDEAS (included in 2019)

22. ERIH PLUS (The European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences) (included in 2019)

 


23. Dimensions (included in 2019)

 

24. Julkaisufoorumi (included in 2019)

 

25. FSTA (Food Science and Technology Abstracts) (included in 2019)

26. JournalTOCs

 

27. ResearchBib

28. Directory of Open Access scholarly Resources (ROAD)

 

29. The Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)

width="225"


30. Genamics JournalSeek (link)

width="225"


31. Polska Bibliografia Naukowa (PBN)


width="225"


33. CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

 

 

34. Neliti

Journal's indexing in world's libraries

 North America

USA


Canadа


Mexico


South America

 

Argentina

 

Peru

 

Europe

 

Great Britain

 

Germany

 

Denmark

 

Ireland

 

Spain

 

Portugal

 

France


Switzerland


Scotland

 

Sweden

 

Slovenia

 

Netherlands

 

Poland

 

Belgium

 

Finland

 

Moldova

 

Asia

 China


 

United Arab Emirates

 

Taiwan

 

South Korea

 

Japan



Australia

 

 

New Zealand

 

Africa

 

Nigeria

 

South African Republic



 

Ethics publications and unfair practices in connection with publications

Principles of professional ethics in the work of the editor and publisher

The editor of a peer-reviewed journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions.

  • An editor should make decisions on which articles to publish based on representational faithfulness and scholarly importance of the proposed work.
  • An editor should be alert to intellectual property issues and must not to publish information if there are reasons to think that it is plagiarism. ·
  • An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, social set-up or political philosophy of the authors.
  • Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
  • An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Every reported act of unethical publishing behavior must be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication. 

 

Publishers should provide reasonable practical support to editors and define the relationship between publishers, editor and other parties in a contract.

  • Publishers should protect intellectual property and copyright.
  • Publishers should foster editorial independence.
  • Publishers should work with journal editors to set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to editorial independence, research ethics, authorship, transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest research funding, reporting standards), peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor, appeals and complaints.
  • Publishers should communicate and periodically review journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers).
  • Publishers should assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases.
  • Publishers are responsible for publishing corrections, clarifications and retractions.

 

Ethical principles in the reviewer work

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. That is why actions of a reviewer should be unbiased.

  • Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  • Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  • Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
  • Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

 

Principles that should guide the author of scientific publications

Authors realize that they are responsible for novelty and faithfulness of research results.

  • Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
  • An author should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the author has used the work and/or words of others, then this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
  • Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Author should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.
  • An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.
  • All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
  • When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

 

The process for handling cases requiring corrections, retractions, and editorial expressions of concern

Corrections, retractions, republications and version control

«Technology audit and production reserves» journal should publish a correction notice as soon as possible detailing changes from and citing the original publication; the correction should be on an electronic or numbered print page that is included in an electronic or a print Table of Contents to ensure proper indexing.

Sсientific misconduct, expressions of concern, and retraction

Scientific misconduct in research publications includes but is not necessarily limited to data fabrication; data falsification including deceptive manipulation of images; purposeful failure to disclose conflicts of interest; and plagiarism. While each of these practices is problematic, they are not equivalent. Each situation requires individual assessment by relevant stakeholders. When scientific misconduct is alleged, or concerns are otherwise raised about the conduct or integrity of work described in submitted or published papers, the editor should initiate appropriate procedures detailed by and adapted from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), consider informing the institutions and funders, and may choose to publish an expression of concern pending the outcomes of those procedures. If the procedures involve an investigation at the authors’ institution, the editor should seek to discover the outcome of that investigation, notify readers of the outcome if appropriate, and if the investigation proves scientific misconduct, publish a retraction of the article. There may be circumstances in which no misconduct is proven, but an exchange of letters to the editor could be published to highlight matters of debate to readers.

 

Headlines of journal

Vol. 1. Industrial and Technology Systems

  • Mechanical Engineering Technology
  • Mechanics
  • Metallurgical Technology
  • Materials Science
  • Technology and System of Power Supply
  • Alternative and Renewable Energy Sources
  • Electrical Engineering and Industrial Electronics

Vol. 2. Information and Control Systems

  • Information Technologies
  • Mathematical Modeling
  • Systems and Control Processes

Vol. 3. Chemical Engineering

  • Chemical and Technological Systems
  • Measuring Methods in Chemical Industry
  • Food Production Technology
  • Ecology and Environmental Technology

Vol. 4. Economics of Enterprises. Macroeconomics

  • Economics and Enterprise Management
  • Economic Cybernetics
  • Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy
  • Problems of Macroeconomics and Socio-Economic Development

 

Plagiarism and duplicate publication

Plagiarism is unacknowledged copying or an attempt to misattribute original authorship, whether of ideas, text or results. Plagiarism can be said to have clearly occurred when large chunks of text have been cut-and-pasted without appropriate and unambiguous attribution. Such manuscripts would not be considered for publication in journal «Technology audit and production reserves». "Text recycling" or reuse of parts of text from an author's previous research publication is a form of self-plagiarism.

Duplicate publication occurs when an author reuses substantial parts of his or her own published work without providing the appropriate references. This can range from publishing an identical paper in multiple journals, to only adding a small amount of new data to a previously published paper.

Journal «Technology audit and production reserves» editors assess all such cases on their individual merits. When plagiarism becomes evident post-publication, we may correct or retract the original publication depending on the degree of plagiarism, context within the published article and its impact on the overall integrity of the published study.

In case of detection of copyright infringement (plagiarism) after publication, the article is not deleted from the journal’s archive (on the website) and is marked as “PLAGIARISM” in accordance with international protocols of anti-plagiarism policy. This article marked as "PLAGIARISM" appears in all resources in which the journal is indexed. The editorial office may impose penalties within the framework of the material and moral damage caused to the Licensee in accordance with clause 6.4 of License agreement.

Material submitted to a «Technology audit and production reserves» journal must be original and not published or submitted for publication elsewhere. This rule applies to material submitted elsewhere while the «Technology audit and production reserves» journal contribution is under consideration.

All manuscripts submitted for consideration to the journal «Technology audit and production reserves» are checked for uniqueness by specialized service StrikePlagiarism.com.

 

Terms of Payment

Publication fee is:

  • 70.00 Euro (publication of an article of 10 pages, designed according to the requirements for articles)
  • 110.00 Euro (publication of an article of 10 pages, designed according to the requirements for articles + printed copy of the journal)
  • the cost of one additional page, designed according to the requirements of the journal, is 5.00 Euro.
Journal doesn't have article submission charge