Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The aim of the journal is to publish research papers dealing with the search for opportunities to reduce costs and improve the competitiveness of products in industry. The peculiarity is that each problem is considered from two sides - the economist’s and the engineer’s, for example, in the context of forming the “price – quality” criterion, in which the first component concerns research in the field of business economics, and the second  engineering. The research result at the intersection of these disciplines can be used in the actual production to identify reserves, providing the opportunity to reduce costs and improve product competitiveness.

 

Section Policies

Mechanical Engineering Technology

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Mechanics

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Metallurgical Technology

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Materials Science

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Technology and System of Power Supply

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Alternative and Renewable Energy Sources

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Electrical engineering and industrial electronics

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Information technologies

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Mathematical modeling

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Systems and control processes

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Chemical and Technological Systems

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Measuring Methods in Chemical Industry

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Food Production Technology

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Ecology and Environmental Technology

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Economics and management of enterprise

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Development of the productive forces and regional economy

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Economic cybernetics

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Problems of macroeconomics and socio-economic development

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The editorial board practices double-blind peer review. This process involves the following.

- First, the editors consider all manuscripts to assess their compliance with the journal subject matter and requirements.

- Following the decision of the editors, the manuscripts submitted are sent to at least two external experts in the corresponding field. The manuscript passes double-blind peer review, neither the authors nor the reviewers know each other.

- Reviewers' comments are transmitted to the authors, together with possible recommendations for the manuscript revision. The editor informs the authors, whether the manuscript is adopted without revision or authors are given the opportunity to review the manuscript and submit it again, or the manuscript is rejected.

 

Publication Frequency

The journal is published bimonthly.

Planning out the journal include:

submitting articles for publication in the next issue - before the 20th of every odd month, the publication of the article - before the 30th of the next (even) month.

Thus, the release of the numbers by months: February, April, June, August, October, December



 

Open Access Policy

"Technological Audit and Production Reserves" is an open access journal. All articles are free for users to access, read, download, and print.

 

Archiving

This journal uses LOCKSS system for distributed archiving published content in multiple libraries and information centers. Library - project LOCKSS ensure long-term storage of comprehensive log files and automatically restoring damaged information.

 

Indexing

1. Index Copernicus  - International scientometric base. (Index Copernicus Journals Master List). This website includes indexing, ranking and abstracting journals, and is a platform for scientific collaboration and joint research projects. (Page "Technology audit and production reserves" ICJML)

 

2. РИНЦ - international bibliographic database of scientific publications of scientists. For information on publications and citations of articles based on the database author uses analytical tools ScienceIndex (Link)

 

3. Ulrich's Periodicals Directorysubscription catalog of American publishing Bowker, is the largest database that describes the global flow of periodicals in all subject areas. (Link)


 

4. DRIVEREuropean meta-repository of scientific publication. All publications on projects funded by the EU, should be available in DRIVER. "Technology audit and production reserves" now meets this requirement. Publication in the "Technology audit and production reserves" will count authors in their reporting to the EU. More detailed information on publications can be found here (Link)


 

5. Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) search engine (Germany), which is one of the most powerful suppliers of actual data on the scientific publications of European scientists. More detailed information on publications can be found here

  (Link)

 

6. ResearchBib an international multi-disciplinary database of scholarly journals, including a description of the log more than 5,400 publishers. (Link)

 

7. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) – это директория, предлагающая свободный (бесплатный) доступ к свыше 1500 научных и академических журналов в электронном формате по всем направлениям. Цель директории состоит в продвижении и популяризация стремительно растущего количества научных журналов, доступных бесплатно через Интернет, а также в повышении роли международного движения “Журналы в открытом доступе” (Open Access Journals) и облегчении доступа к свободным электронным научным и исследовательским журналам. (Link)

 

8. WorldCat — the world's largest bibliographic database, with over 240 million records of all kinds of products for 470 languages. Base is created by joint efforts of more than 72 thousand libraries in 170 countries across the organization Online Computer Library Center. (Link)

 

9. EBSCO - aggregator of full-text publications. Includes 375 full-text databases, and more than 350,000 electronic books. (Link)

 

10. CrossRef is an association of scholarly publishers that develops shared infrastructure to support more effective scholarly communications. Our citation-linking network today covers over 68 million journal articles and other content items (books chapters, data, theses, technical reports) from thousands of scholarly and professional publishers around the globe (link)

 

11. Directory Indexing of International Research Journals - Citefactor is a service that provides access to quality controlled Open Access Journals. The Directory indexing of journal aims to be comprehensive and cover all open access scientific and scholarly journals that use an appropriate quality control system, and it will not be limited to particular languages or subject areas. The aim of the Directory is to increase the visibility and ease of use of open access scientific and scholarly journals thereby promoting their increased usage and impact. (Link)

12. Directory of of Research Joiunals Indexing (DRJI) - provides ready access to education literature to support the use of educational research and information to improve practice in learning, teaching, educational decision-making, and research. Directory of Research Journals Indexing is a free online service that helps you to find web resources for your articles and research. With millions of resources available on the Internet, it can be difficult to find useful material. We have reviewed and evaluated thousands of resources to help you choose key websites in your subject. Our indexed journals will be submitted to all social networks and world's top most indexing and they will be displayed on world's top electronic library. In short, all journals will reach all continents. Certificate of journal "Technology audit and production reserves" Link

 

 

13. Open Academic Journals Index (OAJI) is a full-text database of open-access scientific journals (Link).

 

14. Sherpa/Romeo is the base which save information about publisher copyright policies and self-archiving. Sherpa/Romeo is part of SHERPA Services based at the University of Nottingham. RoMEO has collaborative relationships with many international partners, who contribute time and effort to developing and maintaining the service (Link).

 

15. Open Access Articles is an online directory that indexes and provides access to quality open access, peer-reviewed articles information. The aim of Open Access Articles is to increase the visibility of open access scientific and scholarly journals, articles, thereby promoting their increased usage and impact (Link).

 

16. WorldWideScience.org is a global science gateway - accelerating scientific discovery and progress through a multilateral partnership to enable federated searching of national and international scientific databases and portals (Link).

 

17. JURN is a free online search tool for the finding and downloading of free full-text scholarly works (Link).

 

Ethic norms of publication

The Editors of the journal « Technological Audit and Production Reserves»  maintain a certain level of requirements for selection and accepting of the articles submitted by authors. These rules are determined by the scientific fields covered in the journal.

Drawing up the items of the publication ethics policy of the journal «Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University» Editors followed the recommendations of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE, http://publicationethics.org) and the experience of foreign professional associations and other Ukrainian and foreign research institutions and publishers).

An essential feature of professional scientific community is the acceptance of the moral code which sets the basic rules of behavior and the responsibilities of the scientific community members before each other and in relation to the public. Such a code is defined by the intention to ensure maximum benefit to the professional community and to limit the actions, which could serve the interests of individuals, as well as to ensure an author's intellectual property rights.


Ethical Obligations of Editors of the Scientific and Technical Journal

1. All submitted materials are carefully selected and reviewed. An editorial board reserves the right to reject an article or return it as requiring improvement. The author is obliged to improve the article according to the remarks of the reviewers and the editorial board.

2. An editor should considerate all manuscripts offered for publication without prejudice, evaluating each on its merits without regard to race, religion, nationality, status, or institutional affiliation of the author(s). 3. An editor should consider manuscript submitted for publication without delays.

4. The whole responsibility for acceptance or rejection of an article rests with the editor. Responsible and reasonable approach to the duty requires that the editor seek advice from reviewers, Doctor of Science of required specialty, as to the quality and reliability of manuscripts submitted for publication. However, manuscripts may be rejected without external review if considered by the Editors to be inappropriate for the journal.

5. The editor and members of the editor’s staff should not disclose any information about a manuscript under consideration to anyone other than those from whom professional advice is sought. After a positive decision has been made about a manuscript, it should be published in the journal and in the website of the journal.

6. An editor should respect the intellectual independence of authors.

7. Editorial responsibility and authority for any manuscript authored by an editor and submitted to the editor’s journal should be delegated to other qualified person, such as a member of its Editorial Board.

8. If an editor is presented with convincing evidence that the main substance or conclusions of a report published in an editor’s journal are erroneous, the editor should facilitate publication of an appropriate report pointing out the error and, if possible, correcting it. The report may be written by the person who discovered the error or by an original author.

9. An author may request that the editor not use certain reviewers in consideration of a manuscript. However, the editor may decide to use one or more of these reviewers, if the editor feels their opinions are important in the fair consideration of a manuscript. This might be the case, for example, when a manuscript seriously disagrees with the previous work of a potential reviewer.

 

Ethical Obligations of Authors

1. Main duty of an author is to present an accurate account of the research performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance.

2. An author should be aware that journal space is a limited resource and should use it wisely and economically.

3. A primary research report should contain sufficient detail and reference to public sources of information to permit the author’s peers to repeat the work. When requested, the authors should make a reasonable effort to provide samples of unusual materials unavailable elsewhere, with appropriate material transfer agreements to restrict the field of use of the materials so as to protect the legitimate interests of the authors.

4. An author should cite those publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work and that will guide the reader quickly to the earlier work that is essential for understanding the present investigation. Except in a review, citation of work that will not be referred to in the reported research should be minimized. An author is obligated to perform a literature search to find, and then cite, the original publications that describe closely related work. For critical materials used in the work, proper citation to sources should also be made when these were supplied by a non author.

5. Any unusual hazards appearing during an investigation should be clearly identified in a manuscript reporting the work.

6. Fragmentation of research reports should be avoided. A scientist who has done extensive work on a system or group of related systems should organize publication so that each report gives a well-rounded account of a particular aspect of the general study.

7. In submitting a manuscript for publication, an author should inform the editor of related manuscripts that the author has under editorial consideration or in press. Copies of those manuscripts should be supplied to the editor, and the relationships of such manuscripts to the one submitted should be indicated.

8. It is improper for an author to submit manuscripts describing essentially the same research to more than one journal of primary publication, unless it is a resubmission of a manuscript rejected for or withdrawn from publication. It is generally permissible to submit a manuscript for a full paper expanding on a previously published brief preliminary account (a “communication” or “letter”) of the same work. However, at the time of submission, the editor should be made aware of the earlier communication, and the preliminary communication should be cited in the manuscript.

9. An author should identify the source of all information quoted or offered, except that which is common knowledge. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, should not be used or reported in the author’s work without explicit permission from the investigator with whom the information originated. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, should be treated similarly.

10. An experimental or theoretical study may sometimes justify criticism, even severe criticism, of the work of another scientist. When appropriate, such criticism may be offered in published papers. However, in no case is personal criticism considered to be appropriate.

11. The co-authors of a paper should be all those persons who have made significant scientific contributions to the work reported and who share responsibility and accountability for the results. Other contributions should be indicated in a footnote or an “Acknowledgments” section. An administrative relationship to the investigation does not of itself qualify a person for co-authorship (but occasionally it may be appropriate to acknowledge major administrative assistance). Deceased persons who meet the criterion for inclusion as co-authors should be so included, with a footnote reporting date of death. No fictitious name should be listed as an author or coauthor. The author who submits a manuscript for publication accepts the responsibility of having included as co-authors all persons appropriate and none inappropriate. The submitting author should have sent each living co-author a draft copy of the manuscript and have obtained the co-author’s assent to co-authorship of it.

12. The authors should reveal to the editor and to the readers of the journal any potential and/or relevant competing financial or other interest that might be affected by publication of the results contained in the authors’ manuscript. All authors should not have any personal significant financial interest and employment or other relationship with entities that have a financial or other interest which can affect the results described by the manuscript.

 

Ethical Obligations of Reviewers of Manuscripts

1. As the reviewing of manuscripts is an essential step in the publication process, and therefore in the operation of the scientific method, every scientist has an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.

2. A chosen reviewer who feels inadequately qualified to judge the research reported in a manuscript should return it promptly to the editor.

3. A reviewer of a manuscript should judge objectively the quality of the manuscript, of its experimental and theoretical work, of its interpretations and its exposition, with due regard to the maintenance of high scientific and literary standards. A reviewer should respect the intellectual independence of the authors.

4. A reviewer should be sensitive to the appearance of a conflict of interest when the manuscript under review is closely related to the reviewer’s work in progress or published. If in doubt, the reviewer should return the manuscript promptly without review, advising the editor of the conflict of interest.

5. A reviewer should not evaluate a manuscript authored or co-authored by a person with whom the reviewer has a personal or professional connection if the relationship would bias judgment of the manuscript.

6. A reviewer should treat a manuscript sent for review as a confidential document. It should neither be shown to nor discussed with others except, in special cases, to persons from whom specific advice may be sought; in that event, the identities of those consulted should be disclosed to the editor.

7. Reviewers should explain and support their judgments adequately so that editors and authors may understand the basis of their comments. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. Unsupported assertions by reviewers (or by authors in rebuttal) are of little value and should be avoided.

8. A reviewer should be alert to failure of authors to cite relevant work by other scientists, bearing in mind that complaints that the reviewer’s own research was insufficiently cited may seem self-serving. A reviewer should call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity between the manuscript under consideration and any published paper or any manuscript submitted concurrently to another journal.

9. A reviewer should act promptly, submitting a report in a timely manner.

10. Reviewers should not use or disclose unpublished information, arguments, or interpretations contained in a manuscript under consideration, except with the consent of the author. If this information indicates that some of the reviewer’s work is unlikely to be profitable, the reviewer, however, could ethically discontinue the work.

 

Headlines of journal

Vol. 1. Industrial and Technology Systems

  • Mechanical Engineering Technology
  • Mechanics
  • Metallurgical Technology
  • Materials Science
  • Technology and System of Power Supply
  • Alternative and Renewable Energy Sources
  • Electrical Engineering and Industrial Electronics

Vol. 2. Information and Control Systems

  • Information Technologies
  • Mathematical Modeling
  • Systems and Control Processes

Vol. 3. Chemical Engineering

  • Chemical and Technological Systems
  • Measuring Methods in Chemical Industry
  • Food Production Technology
  • Ecology and Environmental Technology

Vol. 4. Economics of Enterprises

  • Economics and Enterprise Management
  • Economic Cybernetics

Vol. 5. Macroeconomics

  • Development of Productive Forces and Regional Economy
  • Problems of Macroeconomics and Socio-Economic Development