Analysis of accidents of the WWER-1000 reactor in which emergency cooling heat exchangers operate

Authors

  • Tymofii Pyrohov State Enterprise «State Scientific Engineering Center of Control Systems and Emergency Response», 64/56, Heroiv Stalinhradu ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 04213, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0877-1251
  • Alexander Korolev Odessa National Polytechnic University, 1, Shevchenko ave., Odessa, Ukraine, 65044, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7898-8659
  • Vladislav Inyushev State Enterprise «State Scientific Engineering Center of Control Systems and Emergency Response», 64/56, Heroiv Stalinhradu ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 04213, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1040-950X
  • Volodymyr Kurov State Enterprise «State Scientific Engineering Center of Control Systems and Emergency Response», 64/56, Heroiv Stalinhradu ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 04213, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3584-4513

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.213227

Keywords:

emergency cooling heat exchanger, lifetime extension, safe operation, accident, emergency core cooling system.

Abstract

The object of research is the emergency operation modes of the WWER-1000 nuclear installation elements, which also use emergency cooling heat exchangers. The analytical studies carried out are based on an analysis of the operating documentation of the above-mentioned nuclear installation. An analysis of the elements of the emergency core cooling system, which includes emergency cooling heat exchangers, has been carried out. This analysis has shown that in order to localize the accidents of the WWER-1000 reactor unit, the coolant that comes out of the leak is collected in the tank of the plant and from there is pumped by pumps through the above-mentioned heat exchangers. This ensures that the heat of the coolant escaping from the leak is removed and the reactor core is effectively cooled using already cooled water.

As a result of a comparative analysis of design accidents at the WWER-1000 reactor unit, it has been established that the emergency core cooling system is involved in accidents related to a rupture of the first and second reactor circuit pipelines within the containment. Such accidents include small, medium and large leaks in the primary circuit as well as ruptures in the steam line or feed water pipeline of the steam generator (within the containment). A detailed review of the parameters of the coolant that flows out of the leak and into the tip-tank shows that the most conservative accident involving emergency cooling heat exchangers is a «Large leak mode. Bilateral rupture of the main circulation pipeline DN 850 mm». In this accident, the temperature of the coolant in the tip-tanks reaches 110 °С and subsequently enters the inter-tube space of the heat exchangers.

Currently, there is an urgent task to justify the safe operation of nuclear power plant equipment and emergency cooling heat exchangers in particular. The results of the research can serve as baseline data for determining the thermal stress state of the above-mentioned heat exchangers in accidents of the WWER-1000 nuclear installation.

Author Biographies

Tymofii Pyrohov, State Enterprise «State Scientific Engineering Center of Control Systems and Emergency Response», 64/56, Heroiv Stalinhradu ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 04213

Head of Department

Division of Strength Analysis of Elements of Nuclear Installations

Alexander Korolev, Odessa National Polytechnic University, 1, Shevchenko ave., Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Nuclear Power Plants

Vladislav Inyushev, State Enterprise «State Scientific Engineering Center of Control Systems and Emergency Response», 64/56, Heroiv Stalinhradu ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 04213

PhD, First Deputy Director

Volodymyr Kurov, State Enterprise «State Scientific Engineering Center of Control Systems and Emergency Response», 64/56, Heroiv Stalinhradu ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 04213

Head of Department

Department of Long-Term Operation of Nuclear Installations

References

  1. Brumovsky, M. (2014). Guidelines for Integrity and Lifetime Assessment of Components and Piping in WWER NPPs during Operation (VERLIFE). Procedia Engineering, 86, 308–314. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.043
  2. Debarberis L., Gillemot F., Sevini F., Lyssakov V., Davies M., Ballesteros A. (2002). Nuclear power plant life management in some European countries. European commission, 94.
  3. Life Extension of Nuclear Power Plants (2008). CNSC, 19.
  4. Safety aspects of long-term operation of water moderated reactors. Recommendations on the scope and content of programmers for safe long-term operation (2007). Vienna: IAEA, 231.
  5. Periodic Safety Review of Nuclear Power Plants. Specific Safety Guide (2013). Vienna: IAEA, 108.
  6. Povarov, V. P., Fedorov, A. I., Vitkovsky, S. L. (2019). Some aspects of the VVER-440 reactor plant life re-extension: a case study of the Novovoronezh NPP Unit 4. Nuclear Energy and Technology, 5 (3), 249–256. doi: http://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.5.46380
  7. Al-Kusayer, T. A. (1985). Availability of the Emergency Core Cooling System of a CANDU Pressurized Heavy-Water Reactor Following a Small Loss-of-Coolant Accident. Nuclear Technology, 69 (3), 293–307. doi: http://doi.org/10.13182/nt85-a33612
  8. Sotoudeh M., Sepanloo K. (2009). Assessment of Reliability of Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) of Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant. 17-th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (Vol. 2). Brussels, 729–733. doi: http://doi.org/10.1115/icone17-75931
  9. NP 306.099-2004 (2004). Zahalʹni vymohy do prodovzhennya ekspluatatsiyi enerhoblokiv AES u ponadproektnyy strok za rezulʹtatamy zdiysnennya periodychnoyi pereotsinky bezpeky. Kyiv: State Committee for Nuclear Regulation of Ukraine, 16.
  10. PL-D.0.03.126-10 (2010). Polozhennya pro poryadok prodovzhennya stroku ekspluatatsiyi obladnannya, system, vazhlyvykh dlya bezpeky. Kyiv: NNEGC “Energoatom”, 34.
  11. РО.TQ.IE.11.03-17 (2017). Instruktsiya po ekspluatatsii sistemy avariynogo i planovogo okhlazhdeniya aktivnoy zony (SAOZ, aktivnaya chast'). Kyiv: NNEGC “Energoatom”, 93.
  12. 4.59.ОB.02.01 (2010). Otchet po analizu bezopasnosti. Analiz proyektnykh avariy. Adaptatsiya. Itogovyy otchet. Kyiv: NNEGC “Energoatom”, 1910.
  13. IAEA-EBP-WWER-01 (1995). Guidelines for Accident Analysis of WWER Nuclear Power Plants. Vienna: IAEA, 136.
  14. ISBN 92-0-115602-2. STI/PUB/1131 (2002). Accident Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants. Vienna: IAEA, 121.
  15. IAEA-EBP-WWER-09 (1997). Procedures for Analysis of Accidents in Shutdown Modes for WWER Nuclear Power Plants. Vienna: IAEA, 40.
  16. Grundmann, U., Rohde, U. (1993). DYN3D/M2 – a Code for Calculation of Reactivity Transients in Cores with Hexagonal Geometry. IAEA Technical Committee Meeting on Reactivity Initiated Accidents. Report FZR 93-01. Rossendorf, 42.
  17. Grundmann, U., Mittag, S., Rohde, U. (2001). DYN3D2000, Code manual and input data description. Research Center. Rossendorf.
  18. NUREG/CR-5715. SAND91-0835. R4 (1991). Reference Manual for the CONTAIN 1.1 Code for Containment Severe Accident Analysis. Sandia National Laboratories, 1991.
  19. NUREG/CR-5026. SAND87-2309. R4 (1990). User‘s Manual for CONTAIN 1.1. A Computer Code for Severe Nuclear Reactor Accident Containment Assessment Revised for Revision 1.11. Sandia National Laboratories, 445.

Published

2020-10-30

How to Cite

Pyrohov, T., Korolev, A., Inyushev, V., & Kurov, V. (2020). Analysis of accidents of the WWER-1000 reactor in which emergency cooling heat exchangers operate. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5(1(55), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2020.213227

Issue

Section

Reports on research projects