Overview of assessment of enterprise assets according to national accounting standards in the context of safe risks





fair value, net realizable value, depreciation of assets, security risks, martial law


The prerequisites for revising the revaluation of non-current assets of an enterprise and highlighting the methodological aspects of applying individual national accounting standards (regulations) are considered. The object of the study is the assessment of the assets of the enterprise, which is necessary for the reliable display of information about assets in the financial statements, in the presence of security risks. The application of a valuation requires professional judgment to be made about the fair value of the subject matter. At the same time, the concept of fair, market, net realizable value must be divided taking into account the requirements of national accounting standards (regulations) (NAS(R)). In the case that national standards do not provide an answer to certain questions of the methodology for establishing and revising estimates, the norms of international financial reporting standards should be taken into account. Recognition of accounting items at fair value today is widely used in international practice, in contrast to the Ukrainian experience. Valuation and accounting are interrelated concepts, since financial statements must reflect complete, reliable and impartial information about the value of accounting objects.

Today, in Ukrainian accounting, the issue of carrying out the recognition procedure at fair value remains important. This is due to the lack of specific methodological support for this procedure. An analysis of the existing requirements for determining the fair value of certain types of assets makes it possible to make decisions on the basic approach to valuation of assets in the presence of security risks. It was determined that the signs of depreciation of assets under martial law with a high degree of probability is a decrease in the market value of the asset during the reporting period significantly more than expected. This group of signs also includes physical damage to the asset; significant negative changes in the external environment; Significant changes in the way the asset is used during the reporting period.

Author Biography

Tetiana Zatoka, Odessa State Economic University

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of Accounting and Audit


  1. Beker, T., Aikhenhrin, B., Aikhenhrin, B., Horodnichenko, Yu., Horodnichenko, Yu., Huriiev, S. et. al. (2022). Narys pro vidbudovu Ukrainy. CEPR Press. Available at: https://cepr.org/sites/default/files/news/BlueprintReconstructionUkraine_ukr.pdf
  2. Goldberg, V. P. (2018). Reckoning Contract Damages: Valuation of the Contract as an Asset. Washington and Lee law review, 75 (1), 301–366. doi: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2754267
  3. Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., Thieken, A. (2010). Review article «Assessment of economic flood damage». Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10 (8), 1697–1724. doi: http://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010
  4. Sisti, R., Di Ludovico, M., Borri, A., Prota, A. (2018). Damage assessment and the effectiveness of prevention: The response of ordinary unreinforced masonry buildings in Norcia during the Central Italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence. Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 17 (10), 5609–5629. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0448-z
  5. Greenwood, F., Nelson, E. L., Greenough, P. G. (2020). Flying into the hurricane: A case study of UAV use in damage assessment during the 2017 hurricanes in Texas and Florida. PloS one, 15 (2), e0227808. doi: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227808
  6. Gesesew, H., Berhane, K., Siraj, E. S., Siraj, D., Gebregziabher, M., Gebre, Y. G. et. al. (2021). The impact of war on the health system of the Tigray region in Ethiopia: an assessment. BMJ Global Health, 6 (11), e007328. doi: http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007328
  7. Zhang, X. N., Yang, J. F., Du, S. L., Zhi, J. (2013). Damage Assessment of the Attacked Airports Based on Image Analysis. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 321-324, 1168–1171. doi: http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.321-324.1168
  8. Kirin, R. S. (2022). Problemy pravovoho zabezpechennia otsinky militarnoho vplyvu na dovkillia: teoriia, metodolohiia ta praktyka. Multidisciplinary academic notes. theory, methodology and practice. Tokyo, 347–357.
  9. Marynenko, N., Kramar, I. (2022). The cost of war: economic dimensions and preliminary estimates. Voienni konflikty ta tekhnohenni katastrofy: istorychni ta psykholohichni naslidky, 84–87.
  10. Chyzhevska, L. V., Osipchuk, D. S. (2020). Statutory regulation of state aid accounting: international (IFRS) and national approach. Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis, 2 (46), 61–69. doi: http://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2020-2(46)-61-69
  11. Bezverkhyi, K., Bochulia, T. (2014). Metodychni rekomendatsii z otsinky aktyviv i zobov’iazan dlia formuvannia oblikovoi zvitnosti. Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audyt, 9, 15–26.
  12. Pavlyshm, O. (2022). Shell spyshe aktyvy u Rosii na 5 miliardiv dolariv. Ekonomichna pravda. Available at: https://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2022/04/7/685358/
  13. Hordiichuk, D. (2022). Zbytky vid viiny dlia Ukrainy za tyzhden zrosly na 3,5 miliarda dolariv – KShE. Ekonomichna pravda. Available at: https://www.epravda.com.ua/news/2022/03/25/684665/
  14. Disaster Risk Management. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disasterriskmanagement/overview#2
  15. Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku 28 «Zmenshennia korysnosti aktyviv» (2005). Nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy No. 817. 13.01.2005. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0035-05#Text
  16. Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku 7 «Osnovni zasoby» (2000). Nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy No. 92. 27.04.2000. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0288-00#Text
  17. Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku 8 «Nematerialni aktyvy» (1999). Nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy No. 242. 18.10.1999. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0750-99#Text
  18. Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku 9 «Zapasy» (1999). Nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy No.246. 20.10.1999. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0751-99#Text
  19. Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku 10 «Debitorska zaborhovanist» (1999). Nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy No. 237. 08.10.1999. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0725-99#Text
  20. Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku 12 «Finansovi investytsii» (2000). Nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy No. 91. 26.04.2000. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0284-00#Text
  21. Natsionalne polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku 19 «Ob’iednannia pizhpryiemstv» (1999). Nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrainy No .163. 07.07.1999. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0499-99#Text




How to Cite

Zatoka, T. (2022). Overview of assessment of enterprise assets according to national accounting standards in the context of safe risks. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(4(65), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.259664



Economics and Enterprise Management: Original Research