Stationarity disturbance monitoring planning of the flow of waste emissions at a fixed observation time

Authors

  • Нина Александровна Любимова Kharkiv National Аgrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchaev, p/o “Communite”, Kharkiv, 62483, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-8857

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.59857

Keywords:

monitoring, emissions, pollution, time, control and warning interval, statistical significance, reliability

Abstract

This article examines the stationarity disturbance monitoring planning of the flow of multicomponent pollution of flue gases of thermal power plants on local observation intervals. A characteristic feature of the considered monitoring process is a priori uncertainty, stationarity disturbance by mathematical expectation, dispersion and spectrum simultaneously constituting pollution. The limited observation time and economic costs of monitoring procedures brings additional difficulties in the condition of performing routine requirements to the monitoring. Monitoring planning of the flue gas flow control should take into account not only the volume of the sample, but also the order of their carrying out.

It was proposed the method of non-stationarity parameter assessment by introducing preventive control of borders separately for each component of flue gas pollution. Evaluation of stationary pollution processes can reduce the prior uncertainty in the monitoring planning and rank the pollutants in the degree of reducing the risk of their occurrence. This will perform maintenance standards and take into account the risk monitoring of the 1st and 2nd kind.

This approach is useful when monitoring planning of a multi-component pollution, when it is necessary to determine the priority pollutant for a degree of stationary disturbances in local time intervals.

Author Biography

Нина Александровна Любимова, Kharkiv National Аgrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchaev, p/o “Communite”, Kharkiv, 62483

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor,

Department of Mechanization and electrification of agricultural production

References

  1. Jacobson, M. Z. (2009). Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 2, № 2, 148–173. doi:10.1039/b809990c
  2. Ryan, T. P. (2011). Statistical Methods for Quality Improvement. Ed. 3. New York: Wiley, 704. doi:10.1002/9781118058114
  3. Tihonov, V. I., Shahtarin, B. I., Sizyh, V. V. (2004). Random processes. Examples and tasks: the textbook for high schools. Vol. 2. Linear and nonlinear transformations. Moscow: Radio and communication, 400.
  4. Gihman, I., Skorokhod, A. (2012). Theory of random processes. Moscow: Book on demand, 664.
  5. Wentzel, E., Ovcharov, L. (2007). Theory and its engineering applications. Moscow: High School, 490.
  6. Shchapov, P. F. (2005). Planning preventive control of oil-filled power equipment to identify the ageing processes with a given reliability decision making. Electrical Engineering and Electromechanics, 3, 65–68.
  7. Levin, B. (1976). Theoretical basis of statistical radio engineering. Book 3. Moscow: Soviet radio, 288.
  8. Kruglov, V. (2013). Random processes. Moscow: CI Academy, 336.
  9. Sahtarin, B. (2010). Random processes in engineering. Vol. 1. Linear transformation. Moscow: Hotline-Telecom, 520.
  10. Chashkin, J. R.; In: Smolenskii, S. N. (2010). Mathematical statistics. Analysis and data processing. Moscow: Phoenix, 236.
  11. Artyukh, S., Lyubymova, N. (2014). Estimation of parameters of random processes of environmental pollution, energy enterprises. Bulletin of NTU «KhPI», 24 (1067), 11–16.

Published

2016-01-21

How to Cite

Любимова, Н. А. (2016). Stationarity disturbance monitoring planning of the flow of waste emissions at a fixed observation time. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 1(2(27), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.59857