The evaluation of anairobic digestion efficiency for wastewater treatment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.71495

Keywords:

filtrate, municipal solid waste landfill, anaerobic digestion

Abstract

The object of study is regularities of the anaerobic digestion process for drains treatment. This helps to improving environment.

The method of anaerobic digestion is effective for wastewater treatment from biological contaminants. The important advantage of the method is lack of negative effect to environment. Biogas is released during the process. Strict temperature limits and lack of oxygen are limited the process.

It was found that the optimum temperature of the process is 54-55 ºC. At temperatures below 37 ºC the amount of Enterobacteriaceae increases even in comparison with the initial values, and the content of helminths increases. Increasing the temperature to 45 ºC leads to destruction of helminths, but sufficiently large number of enterobacteria are still present in the sludge. At a temperature of 55 ºC the content of Enterobacteriaceae decreases. Continuous and fed batch ways of fermentation process are found to be the most effective.

Author Biographies

Валерия Валериевна Михайленко, Pryazovskyi State Technical University, Universytets’ka 7, Mariupol, 87500

Assistant

Department of Chemical Technology and Engineering

Алексей Евгеньевич Капустин, Pryazovskyi State Technical University, Universytets’ka 7, Mariupol, 87500

Doctor of Chemical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Chemical Technology and Engineering

References

  1. Korinevskaia, V. Yu., Shchanina, T. P. (2011). Othody gorodskih sistem kak potentsial'nyi resurs i istochnik sagriasneniia okruzhaiushei prirodnoi sredy. Vestnik Odesskogo gosudarstvennogo ekologicheskogo universiteta, 11, 20–28.
  2. Guerrero, L. A., Maas, G., Hogland, W. (2013, January). Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Management, Vol. 33, № 1, 220–232. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008
  3. Porta, D., Milani, S., Lazzarino, A. I., Perucci, C. A., Forastiere, F. (2009). Systematic review of epidemiological studies on health effects associated with management of solid waste. Environmental Health, Vol. 8, № 1, 60–66. doi:10.1186/1476-069x-8-60
  4. Varnavskaia, I. V. (2008). Analis uslovii obrasovaniia i sostava stochnyh vod poligonov tverdyh bytovyh othodov. Ekologiia i promyshchlennost', 1, 7–14.
  5. Velikanov, N. L., Velikanova, M. N., Kolobov, A. V. (2009). Ochistka stochnyh vod svalok tverdyh bytovyh othodov, otdel'nyh sdanii i sooruzhenii. Isvestiia Kaliningradskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta, 15, 60–64.
  6. Maiorov, S. A., Sedov, Yu. A., Parahin, Yu. A. (2009). Elektrohimicheskaia ochistka hosiaistvenno-bytovyh i promfekal'nyh stochnyh vod. Vodoochistka, 10, 41–43.
  7. Stalinskii, D. V. et al. (2009). K voprosu ob ochistke stochnyh vod poligonov tverdyh bytovyh othodov. Naukovyi visnyk budivnytstva, 52, 120–129.
  8. Yatskov, N. V., Varnavskaia, I. V. (2008). Analis metodov ochistki stokov mest sahoroneniia tverdyh bytovyh othodov. Ekolohiia dovkillia ta bezpeka zhyttiediialnosti, 4, 69–73.
  9. Olaleye, J. B., Sangodina, J. O. (2000). Environmental Protection and Management: The Surveyor’s. Proceedings of the Technical Session of the 35th Annual General Meetings and Conference of the Nigerian Institution of Surveyors. Benin City, Nigeria, 51–57.
  10. Katraeva, I. V. (2011). Sovremennye anaerobnye apparaty dlia ochistki kontsentrirovannyh stochnyh vod. Isvestiia KasGASU, 2 (16), 179–184.
  11. Poinapen, J., Ekama, G., Wentzel, M. (2009, December 15). Biological sulphate reduction with primary sewage sludge in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactor – Part 4: Bed settling characteristics. Water SA, Vol. 35, № 5, 553–560. doi:10.4314/wsa.v35i5.49181
  12. Fedianin, V. Ya. (2004). Analis kineticheskih uravnenii dlia protsessa anaerobnogo sbrazhivaniia v metantenkah s periodicheskoi sagruskoi. Polsunovskii vestnik, 2, 244–248.
  13. Poinapen, J., Ekama, G. A. (2010). Biological sulphate reduction with primary sewage sludge in an upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor – Part 6: Development of a kinetic model for BSR. Water SA, Vol. 36, № 3, 203–213.
  14. Appels, L., Baeyens, J., Degrève, J., Dewil, R. (2008, December). Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 34, № 6, 755–781. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002
  15. Siegrist, H., Vogt, D., Garcia-Heras, J. L., Gujer, W. (2002, March). Mathematical Model for Meso- and Thermophilic Anaerobic Sewage Sludge Digestion. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 36, № 5, 1113–1123. doi:10.1021/es010139p
  16. Stabilisatsiia osadkov stochnyh vod i aktivnogo ila v anaerobnyh i aerobnyh usloviiah. (2009). Stroi-Spravka. Available: http://stroy-spravka.ru/article/stabilizatsiya-osadkov-stochnykh-vod-i-aktivnogo-ila-v-anaerobnykh-i-aerobnykh-usloviyakh
  17. Kuris, Yu. V. (2011). Metanohenez i tekhnolohichni skhemy otrymannia biohazu. Al'ternativnye istochniki energii, 10 (92), 41–47.
  18. Sadyhov, G. R. (2013). Issledovanie vliianiia uskoritelia na sakonomernosti protsessa anaerobnogo sbrazhivaniia. Vestnik MGOU. Seriia: Estestvennye nauki, 4, 27–31.
  19. Tomei, M., Braguglia, C., Mininni, G. (2008, September). Anaerobic degradation kinetics of particulate organic matter in untreated and sonicated sewage sludge: Role of the inoculum. Bioresource Technology, Vol. 99, № 14, 6119–6126. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.035
  20. Kiely, G., Tayfur, G., Dolan, C., Tanji, K. (1997, March). Physical and mathematical modelling of anaerobic digestion of organic wastes. Water Research, Vol. 31, № 3, 534–540. doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00175-3
  21. Shavkun, V., Kapustin, A. (2012). Metody issledovaniia poligona tverdyh bytovyh othodov. Visnyk Pryazovskoho derzhavnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Ser. Tekhnichni nauky, 25, 265–273.

Published

2016-05-26

How to Cite

Михайленко, В. В., & Капустин, А. Е. (2016). The evaluation of anairobic digestion efficiency for wastewater treatment. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 3(3(29), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2016.71495

Issue

Section

Technologies of food, light and chemical industry