Treatment optimisation of chronic prostatitis and secondary premature ejaculation
Materials and methods. In 2007-2019 in the andrological department of the KZOZ “RCCUN them. V. I. Shapoval“, 968 patients with premature ejaculation were examined. In this sample, the results of diagnosis and treatment of 393 patients with secondary PE with an Intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) were evaluated for less than 2 minutes. Based on penile biothesiometry, sexual history, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)? study of urological complaints, doppler ultrasound examination of the prostate and scrotum, analyzes for sexually transmitted infections, and the use of the Hamilton Rate Depression Scale (HRDS), there are suggestions for the most likely cause of PE. This allowed the patients to be divided into 4 groups:
Group 1 - 62 patients with normal penile sensitivity without deviations in the psychoneurological status with diagnosed chronic prostatitis (CP), who underwent antibacterial treatment according to EAU guidelines (levofloxacin 0.5 for 6 months), Group 2 – 145 patients with chronic prostatitis were treated according to the sensitivity of the isolated infectious agents; Group 3 consisted of 92 patients with CP and the presence of varicocele, which, in addition to antibiotic therapy, were underwent Marmara surgery; Group 4 - 94 patients with neurological complaints and high anxiety HRDS>14, whose treatment consisted in the appointment of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline by a course of 6 months at a dose of 50 mg per day.
Results. After 1 and 7 months, the effectiveness of the treatment was determined by the lengthening of the intravaginal ejaculatory latent time (IELT), the satisfaction of sexual intercourse on IIEF, the number of patients satisfied with the results of treatment and the absence of prostatic symptoms and infection agents.
In group 1, the duration of IELT increased by 1.76 times, eradication of the disease reached 68.2%, high results were observed in the absence of complaints in 83.8% of patients, but in respect of the SPE, the efficacy was not high - only 56.4%. In the 2nd group, high eradication cure was noted – 86.9%, almost complete absence of complaints and high efficiency with respect to the SPE - 89.6%, increase in IELT - by 2.54 times. In the third group, eradication cure reached 89.6%, almost no complaints and high efficiency with respect to the SPE - 89.1%, increased by 2.72 times. In the fourth group of patients receiving sertraline, the average increase in IELT was 2.36 times, the efficacy with respect to SPE was 64.9%.
Conclusions. 1. The cause of SPE is most often chronic prostatitis and prostatevisculitis (76.6%). 2. The appointment of SSRI in case of SPE is rational only in the presence of neurological symptoms (HRDS> 14) and absence of CP. 3. Varicocele (especially bilateral) is a comorbid factor of CP, causing venous hyperemia of the prostate, and may be one of the causes of SPE. 4. Operation Marmar reduces venous hyperemia of the prostate, reduces the score of IPSS, improves IELT in patients with comorbid pathology (varicocele + CP). 5. Antibacterial therapy of CP allows to cure SPE in 56.4%, so almost half of patients stay dissatisfied. 6. Bacteriological examination detects more often Trichomonas (68.3%), Mycoplasma (55.2%) and polymicrobal association in different combinations. 7. Prescribing of antiprotozoal medicine optimizes treatment of chronic prostatitis and increases effectiveness of treatment Secondary PE up to 89.1%.
Full Text:PDF (Русский)
Горпинченко И.И., Сытенко А.М., Нуриманов К.Р., Зайцев В.И., Махер Гафси. Обоснование анкеты «Профиль преждевременной эякуляции» в качестве инструмента для оценки симптомов преждевременной эякуляции. Здоровье мужчины. 2009. № 1. С. 110–114.
Сексопатология: справочник / под ред. Г.С. Васильченко. М.:Медицина, 1990. С. 520–539.
Андрология. Мужское здоровье и дисфункция репродуктивной системы: пер. с англ. / под ред. Э. Нишлага, Г.М. Бере. М.: ООО «МИА», 2005. 228 с.
Горпинченко І.І., Воробець Д.З. Ефективність інгібіторів зворотного захоплення серотоніну в лікуванні чоловіків з передчасною еякуляцією. Здоровье мужчины. 2009. № 4. С. 90–95.
Sadeghi Nejaad H., Watson R. Premature ejaculation: Current medical treatment and new directions. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2008. No. 5. P. 1037–1050.
Waldiger M.C. et al. A multinational population survey on intravaginal ejaculation latency time. Journ. Sex. Med. 2005. No. 2. P. 492–497.
Seftel A.D. Rasch Analysis of the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) in an Iranian Sample of Prostate Cancer Patients. J Urol. 2017. Vol. 197, No. 6. P. 1534–1535. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.091.
Abu El-Hamd M., Abdelhamed A. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of the on demand use of paroxetine, dapoxetine, sildenafil and combined dapoxetine with sildenafil in treatment of patients with premature ejaculation: A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Andrologia. 2018. Vol. 50, No. 1. doi: 10.1111/and.12829.
Zhu D., Dou X., Tang L., Tang D., Liao G., Fang W., Zhang X. Prevalence of Prostatitis-Like Symptoms and Outcomes of NIH-CPSI in Outpatients with Lifelong and Acquired PE: Based on a Large Cross-Sectional Study in China. Biomed Res Int. 2017. doi: 10.1155/2017/3473796.
McMahon C.G., Jannini E.A., Serefoglu E.C., Hellstrom W.J. The pathophysiology of acquired premature ejaculation. Transl Androl Urol. 2016. Vol. 5, No. 4. P. 434–449.
Chen C.Q., Yi Q.T., Chen C.H., Gong M. Effect of Interventions for Premature Ejaculation in the Treatment of Chronic Prostatitis with Secondary Premature Ejaculation. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2016. Vol. 38, No. 4. P. 393–398.
Лесовой В.Н., Книгавко А.В., Аркатов А.В., Савенков В.И., Картавцев А.В. Малоинвазивные методы лечения эякуляторных расстройств. Здоровье мужчины. 2015. № 2. С. 87–91.
Капто А.А. Клинические аспекты сосудистой анатомии у пациентов с варикоцеле (лекция). Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2016. № 2. С. 70–79.