SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND PROBLEMS OF SOCIAL ENTERPRISE TRAINING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.171148Ключові слова:
social entrepreneurship, social enterprise, socially oriented non-profit organizations, social innovations, business schools, educational programs, academic disciplines.Анотація
Abstract. The worldwide financial improvement pattern is to build state and corporate social duty and to
create common society foundations. Social duty underlies the improvement of social business enterprise and socially arranged non-benefit associations, whose exercises are specifically identified with meeting distinctive social needs running from instructive administrations to magnanimous help. In any case, two different ways are being examined to take care of this issue. Right off the bat, the applied meaning of the properties of social business enterprise and socially situated non-benefit associations so as to shape successful systems of state control and money related help in this circle. Also, usage of preparing and retraining of staff who comprehend the particulars of enterprising movement in the social circle and can consider present day requests and necessities for this monetary area, and know about the cutting edge
prerequisites for the practicality of the state social capacities. In such manner, the article breaks down the phases of social enterprise hypothesis improvement and various issues identified with staff preparing and retraining programs for social business and socially situated non-benefit associations.
Keywords: social entrepreneurship, social enterprise, socially oriented non-profit organizations, social
innovations, business schools, educational programs, academic disciplines.
Посилання
Bella, D. A. (1978). Peer accountability for rationale of impact statements. ASCE Eng Issues J Prof Act.
Brock, D.D., Steiner, S.D. (2009). Social Entrepreneurship Education: Is It Achieving the Desired Aims?
URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1344419
Choi, N., Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 363-376.
Crimmings, J.C., Kiel, M. (1983). Enterprise in the nonprofit sector. Washington, DC: Partners for Livable Places.
Davoudi SMM, Fartash K, Venera G. Zakirova, Asiya M. Belyalova, Rashad A. Kurbanov, Anna V. Boiarchuk, Zhanna M. Sizova (2018). Testing the Mediating Role of Open Innovation on the Relationship
between Intellectual Property Rights and Organizational Performance: A Case of Science and Technology Park, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1359-1369.
Dees, J.G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard business review, 76(1), 54-67.
Dees, J.G., Anderson, B.B. (2006). Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: building on two schools of practice and thought. Research on social entrepreneurship, ARNOVA occasional paper series, 1 (3), 39–66
Defourny, J., Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 32-53.
Dholakia, N., Dholakia, R.R. (1975). Marketing Planning in a Social Enterprise: A Conceptual Approach. European Journal of Marketing, 9(3), 250-258.
Elert, N., Andersson, F.W., Wennberg, K. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education in high school on long-term entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 111, 209-223.
Fraser A., Tan S., Lagard M., Mays, N. (2018). Narratives of Promise, Narratives of Caution: A review of the Literature on Social impact Bonds. Social Policy and Administration, 52(1), 4-28.
Fraser, J.T. (1978). Elements of Social Organization. Journal of Social and Biological Systems, 1, 339.
Gonin, M., Besharov, M.L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407-442.
Grimes, M.G., Gehman, J., Cao, K. Positively deviant: Identity work through B Corporation certification. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(2), 130–148.
Hlady-Rispal, M., Servantie, V. (2018). Deconstructing the Way in which Value Is Created in the Context of Social Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 62-80.
Hunt, J. McV. (1949). A social agency as a setting for research. The Institute of Welfare Research.
Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13(2), 69-81.
Kickul, J., Janssen-Selvadural, Ch., Griffiths, M. (2012). A Blended Value Framework for Educating the Next Cadre of Social Entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(3), 479–493.
Kukla, A. (1984). Objectivity revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(3), 681-683.
Kutuev, R.A., Mashkin, N.A., Yevgrafova, O.G., Morozov, A.V., Zakharova, A.N., Parkhaev, V.T. (2017). Methodological Guidance of Educational Monitoring Effectiveness. Modern Journal of Language
Teaching Methods, 7(3), 405-410.
Lumpkin, G.T., Moss, T.W., Gras, D.M., Kato, S., Amezcua, A.S. (2013). Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: How are they different, if at all? Small Business Economics. 40(3), 761-783.
Massarsky, C.W., (2006). Coming of age: social enterprise reaches its tipping point. Research on social entrepreneurship. ARNOVA occasional paper series, 1 (3), 67–88.
McMullen, J.S., Warnick B.J. (2016). Should we require every new venture to be a hybrid organization? Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 630–662
Miller T., Wesley C., Williams, D. (2012). Educating the Minds of Caring Hearts: Comparing the Views of Practitioners and Educators on the Importance of Social Entrepreneurship Competencies. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(3), 349–370.
Mirabella, R.M., Eikenberry, A.M. (2017). The Missing “Social” in Social Enterprise Education in the United States. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 23(2), 729-748.
OECD/EU (2017). Boosting Social Enterprise Development: Good Practice Compendium, OECD Publishing, Paris. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264268500-en
Pullman, M., Longoni, A., Luzzini, D. (2018). Emerging Discourse Incubator: The Roles of Institutional Complexity and Hybridity in Social Impact Supply Chain Management. Journal of Supply Chain
Management, 54 (2), 3-20.
Salamon, L.M., Sokolowski, S.W. (2016). Beyond non-profits: re-conceptualizing the third sector. Voluntas, 27, 1515–1545.
Sassmannshausen, S.P., Volkmann, C. (2018). The Scientometrics of Social Entrepreneurship and its
Establishment as an Academic Field. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(2), 251-273.
Sharma, G., Beveridge, ’Alim J., & Haigh, N. (2018). A configural framework of practice change for B corporations. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(2), 207–224.
Skloot, E. (1987). Enterprise and commerce in non-profit organizations. In: W.W. Powell, ed. The non-
profit sector: a research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 380–393.
Skloot, E., (1983). Should not-for-profits go into business. Harvard business review, 61 (1), 20–27.
Stephan, U., Patterson, M., Kelly, C., Mair, J. (2016). Organizations driving positive social change: a review and an integrative framework of change processes. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1250-1281.
Sundar, P. (1996). Women and philanthropy in India. Voluntas, 7(4), 412–427.
Tastan, S.B., & Davoudi, S.M.M. (2017). The Relationship between Organisational Climate and Organizational Innovativeness: Testing the Moderating Effect of Individual Values of Power and
Achievement. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Publishers, 12(4): 465-483.
Zahra S.A., Wright M. (2016). Understanding the social role of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 610-629.
##submission.downloads##
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Автори, які публікуються у цьому журналі, погоджуються з наступними умовами:
1. Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution License, котра дозволяє іншим особам вільно розповсюджувати опубліковану роботу з обов'язковим посиланням на авторів оригінальної роботи та першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
2. Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному сховищі установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
3.Політика журналу дозволяє і заохочує розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання цього рукопису до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи.
