FEATURES OF THE DYSPHEMISMS IN ARTISTIC DISCOURSE

Автор(и)

  • Olga Prokhorova
  • Igor Chekulai
  • Ekaterina Bekh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.173614

Анотація

Abstract. This article describes the specific features of the dysphemisms used in the artistic discourse. We examined the history of the study of the concept of discourse, disassembled the differences between the concepts of "discourse" and "text," and also identified key features of the artistic text. The term "dysfemism" is defined in the work and its differences from vulgarisms and explicit language are singled out. We have established a special role of the dysphemisms in the framework of artistic discourse. Within the framework of artistic discourse, dysfemisms have a specific goal: to demonstrate to the recipient the emotional state of the hero and his attitude to a particular phenomenon. From this perspective, we examined the different types of dysfemisms used in artistic discourse and selected examples from English fiction prose.
Keywords: Artistic discourse; Artistic text; Dysphemism; Euphemism.

Посилання

Artjushkina, L.V. (2002). Semanticheskij aspekt jevfemisticheskoj leksiki v sovremennom anglijskom jazyke: avtoref. dis. ... step. kand. filol. nauk [Semantic aspect of the euphemistic vocabulary in modern English: PhD (Philological Sciences)]. Moscow.

Arutjunova, N.D. (1998). Jazykoznanie. Bol'shoj jenciklopedicheskij slovar' [Linguistics. The Great Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow: Bol'shaja Rossijskaja jenciklopedija.

Barinova, A.V. (2002). Stilisticheskaja oppozicija jevfemizm, disfemizm v rakurse funkcional'nyh stilej sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka (k postanovke problemy) [Stylistic opposition euphemism, dysphemism in the forefront of the functional styles of the modern Russian literary language (to the formulation of the problem)]. Rechevoe obshhenie (Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty rechevogo obshhenija), 4 (12), 44–48.

Bow, J. (1991). Jane's journey. Lewes, East Sussex: The Book Guild Ltd.

Cooper, F. (1993). I believe in angels. London: Serpent's Tail.

Cornwell, B. (1990). Crackdown. London: Michael Joseph Ltd.

Guo, H. (2017). Osobennosti diskursa hudozhestvennogo proizvedenija [Features of the discourse of the work of art]. Molodoj uchenyj, 20(154), 483-486.

Karasik, V.I. (2002). Jazykovoj krug: lichnost', koncepty, diskurs [Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena.

Matveeva, T.V. (2010). Polnyj slovar' lingvisticheskih terminov [Full Dictionary of Linguistic Terms]. Rostov- on-Don.

Pastuhova, O.D. (2015). Disfemizmy anglijskogo jazyka i ih strukturnye osobennosti [Dysfemism of English language and their structural features]. SMALTA, 2.

Rezanova, A.N. (2007). Pragmatika disfemii v sovremennom anglijskom jazyke [Pragmatics of dysphhemia in modern English]. Studia Linguistica XVI. Jazyk. Tekst. Kul'tura.

Ripley, M. (1991). Angel hunt. London: Fontana Press.

Rutherford, D. (1990). A game of sudden death. London: Macmillan & Doubleday.

Sidelnikova, E.A. (2011). Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskaja specifika jevfemizacii, disfemizacii v narrative finansovo-jekonomicheskogo krizisa [Communicatively pragmatic specifics of euphemism, dysfemization in the narrative of the financial and economic crisis]. Politicheskaja lingvistika, 4, 253-258.

Tjupa, V.I. (2002). Khudozhestvennyj diskurs [Artistic discourse]. Tver': Izd-vo TvGU.

##submission.downloads##

Номер

Розділ

Мистецтвознавство