DIALECTIC OF ETHNIC IDENTITY AND CLASS: COEXISTENCE OR CONFLICT?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.175162Анотація
Abstract. The study aimed to investigate coexistence or conflict between ethnic and class identity, the subjects to the study were 400 chosen from Turkmen, Turk and Sistani people aged 15-29 in Gonbad Kavoos City due to the ethnic scattering and socioeconomic structure. First, the conceptual study on ethnic and class identity, pervious research and George Herbert Mead's theory has been done. Then, assuming impact of socialization on identity construction, the coordination between family, school and university for the purpose of formation of ethnic and class identity was investigated. Both objective and subjective ethnic identity and class identification in the two forms of traditional and modern were investigated. Result showed that only objective ethnic identity and class identification in its modern form have had conflicting interaction among university students. However, the subjects have had peaceful coexistence in other dimensions. It should be said that there was a lack of coordination between university, school and family in the
transmission of values and patterns.
Key words: Identity, Ethnic identity, class identity, socialization.
Посилання
Abazari, Yousef, Ali and Chavoshian, Hassan. (2003). from social class to lifestyle: new approaches in
sociological analysis of social identity. A social science. No. 20. pp. 28-3.
Ahmadloo, Habib and Afrough, Emad. (2003). the relationship between national identity and ethnic identity
among the youth of Tabriz. National studies. No. 13. Pages 144-109.
Islami, Alireza (2007). Ethnicity and its dimensions in Iran. Political science. No. 34, pp. 212-195.
Akbarzadah, Nasrin (1997). The transition from adolescence to old age. Tehran: author.
Tavassoli, Qulam Abbas. (1997). Sociological theories. Tehran: Samt Publication.
Hajiyani, Abraham (2010). Sociology of Iranian identity. Tehran: Center for Strategic Research.
. Dehkhoda, Aliakbar (1963). Dictionary. Tehran: Tehran University press.
Rajaei, Farhang (2007). Current problem of Iranian identity. Tehran: Ney Publications.
Razzazi Far, Afsar. (2000). Sociological model of national identity in Iran. National studies. (5). Pages 134-101.
Abdullahi, Mohammed (1996). Sociology of identity crisis. A research. First year. NO. (2) and (3) pp. 162-135.
Allan, Kenneth. (2010). The social lens: An invitation to social and sociological theory. London: Sage.
. Aries, Elizabeth & Seider, Maynard. (2007). the role of social class in the formation of identity. Social
psychology.147 (2). pp 137-157.
Bendix, R. & Lipst, M. (1967). Class, status and power. London: R.K.P.
Benett, Tony & etal (ed).(2005). New keywords. Oxford: Blackwell.
Berger, Peter & Luckman, Thomas. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, New York: Anchor
Books.
Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. . London: Rutledge.
Bottero, Wendy & Prandy, Kenneth. (2003). Social interaction distance and stratification. British Journal of
sociology. 54(2), 177-197.
Burke, P. J. (1991). Identity process and social stress. American sociological Review, 56 (6), 836_849.
Crawley, Angela. (ed) (2005). Oxford Advanced learner's Dictionary of current English. Oxford university press.
Cronk, George. (1973). Symbolic interactionism: A “left – meaian” interaction. Social theoy and practice. 2(3),
-333.
David, Anne. (2009). Mead, Frued and the self. IDEATE. 2,1-8.
Fine, Ben & Saad-Filho, Alfredo. (2004). Marx's capital. Fourth edition. London: Pluto press.
Goy, J. L. (2000). Notes for an article on the individual (unpublished dratt). Found posthumously 2.
Hewitt, Tohn p. (2002). Self and society: A symbolic interactions social psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Higgs, Paul & Gilleard , Chris . (2006) . Departing the margins social class and later life in a second modernity.
Sociology. Vol 42 . No 3 . pp 219-241 .
Howard, Judit. A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of sociology, 26, 367-393.
Issajiv, WE. Kalbach & Reitz, W. (1990). Ethnic identity and equality. Toronto: Toronto university press.
Jenkins, Richard. (1996). Social Identity. London: Rutledge.
Jenkins, Richard. (2000). Categorization: Identity, social processes and epistemology. Current sociology, 48 (3),
_25.
Luscher, Kurt. (1990). The social reality perspectives. Symbolic interaction. 13(1), 1-18.
Macionis, J. & plummer, K. (2005). Sociology: A global interdiction. Harlow: pearson education limited.
Malik, K. (1996). The meaning of race. London: Macmillan.
Martha, Banal. E & Kinshes, George P. (1993). Ethnic identity formation and transition among Hispanic and other
Minorities. New York
Marx, Karl & Engels, Friedrich. (1848/2008). Manifesto to the communist party. Volume one. Open source
socialist publishing.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: university of Chicago press.
Nonda, Serena & Worms, Richard. (1998). Cultural anthropology. Thomson words worth.
Ritzer, George. (1989). Sociological theory. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
Savage, Mike & Bennet, Tony. (2005). Editor's introduction: cultural capital and social inequality_British Journal
of sociology. 56(1), 1-12.
Scheafer, Richard J. (1989). Sociology. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
Shepard, Ton M. (2007). Sociology. Thomson words worth.
Stiegler, Bernard. (1998). Technics and time, 1. translated by Richard Beardworth and George Collins. Stanford,
California: Stanford university press.
Stryker, Sheldon. (2008). From mead to a structural symbolic interactionismand beyond. Annual review sociology.
, 15-31.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroups relations. Annual Review of psychology, 33, 1- 39.
Tomlinson, John. (2003). Globalization and cultural identity. In D.Held and A. G. Mc Grew (Eds). The global
transformation reader. (269-277). Cambridge: polity press.
Wacquant, L. (1991). Making class: The middle class(es) in social theory and social structure . New York:
Westview press.
Weedon, Chris. (2004). Identity and culture. Open University press.
##submission.downloads##
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Автори, які публікуються у цьому журналі, погоджуються з наступними умовами:
1. Автори залишають за собою право на авторство своєї роботи та передають журналу право першої публікації цієї роботи на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution License, котра дозволяє іншим особам вільно розповсюджувати опубліковану роботу з обов'язковим посиланням на авторів оригінальної роботи та першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
2. Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного розповсюдження роботи у тому вигляді, в якому вона була опублікована цим журналом (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному сховищі установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на першу публікацію роботи у цьому журналі.
3.Політика журналу дозволяє і заохочує розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у сховищах установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання цього рукопису до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи.
