DIDACTIC POSSIBILITIES OF THE MODERN SCHOOL HISTORY TEXTBOOK IN THE ORGANIZATION OF THE LEARNING PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2313-2094.6/38.121485Keywords:
textbook, type of lesson, structure of the lesson, personally oriented learning, methods of cognitive activityAbstract
MOHORYTA Viktor – Lecture of History, Mizhhirya Medical College, Taras Shevchenko str., 1, Mizhhirya, 90000, Ukraine (mogor@meta.ua)
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6482-8868
ResearcherID: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/D-4307-2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2313-2094.6/38.121485
To cite this article: Mohoryta, V. (2018). Dydaktychni mozhlyvosti suchasnoho shkilnoho pidruchnyka istorii v orhanizatsii protsesu navchannia [Didactic possibilities of the modern school history textbook in the organization of the learning process]. Liudynoznavchi studii. Seriia «Pedahohika» – Human Studies. Series of «Pedagogy», 6/38, 244–254. doi: 10.24919/2313-2094.6/38.121485 [in Ukrainian].
Article history
Received: 14 November 2017
Received in revised form: 12 January 2018
Accepted: 15 February 2018
Available online: 5 April 2018
Abstract. The article focuses on the importance of the textbook as a source of knowledge, and the formation of key and substantive competencies. Various approaches to the classification of history lessons and their structural components in pedagogical science are revealed. The possibility of using the textbook for organizing educational activities of pupils at different stages of the lesson has been explored. To this end, the contents of textbooks on the history of Ukraine and the world history of 2017 edition of the 9th form are studied. Specific examples show the diversity of didactic approaches to the content of the textbook used by the authors.
In the article a comparative analysis of the contents of history textbooks is carried out on the subject of the specificity of the acquisition of knowledge by students of history. The emphasis is placed on the importance of organizing various forms of work with the textbook in the classroom in order to form the key and subject competences of the schoolchildren. Specific examples are the authorʼs approach to selecting a system of tasks for the implementation of a person-centered approach in teaching.
It is concluded that the modern lesson is characterized by flexibility of its structure, productive educational and cognitive activity of students. It is also grounded that the content of modern history textbooks with the correct selection of didactic methods and techniques is a key to the formation of key and subject competences in schoolchildren. The necessity of further researches of the possibilities of use of textbook in organization of independent cognitive activity of schoolchildren is determined.
Acknowledgments. Sincere thanks to pedagogical staff at school № 2 and № 7, in particular Mykhaylo Labosh and Lyubov Vasylynka.
Funding. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Funding from Scientific-Educational Foundation «Ridna Shkola» permitted this research completion.
References
Vlasov, V. (2017). Istoriia Ukrainy: pidruchnyk dlia 9 klasu zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [History of Ukraine: Textbook for the 9th form of general education institutions]. Kyiv: Litera LTD [in Ukrainian].
Hisem, O., & Martyniuk, O. (2017). Vsesvitnia istoriia. 9 klas: pidruchnyk dlia zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [World History. Grade 9: textbook for general education institutions]. Kharkiv: Ranok [in Ukrainian].
Diachkov, S.V., & Lytovchenko, S.D. (2017). Vsesvitnia istoriia: pidruchnyk dlia 9 klasu zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [World History: Textbook for Grade 9 General Education Institutions]. Kharkiv: Ranok [in Ukrainian].
Istoriia Ukrainy. Vsesvitnia istoriia. 5–9 klasy: navchalna prohrama dlia zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [History of Ukraine. World history. 5–9 classes: An on-line tutorial is for general educational establishments]. (2017). Retrieved from http://mon.gov.ua/activity/education/zagalna-serednya/navchalni-programi-5-9-klas-2017.html [in Ukrainian].
Burneiko, I.O., Khlibovska, H.M., Kryzhanovska, M.Ye., & Naumchuk, O.V. (2017). Istoriia Ukrainy: pidruchnyk dlia 9 klasu zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [History of Ukraine: Textbook for the 9th form of general education institutions]. Ternopil: Aston [in Ukrainian].
Levitas, F. (2006). Suchasnyi urok: osnovni vymohy do orhanizatsii navchalnoho protsesu [Contemporary lesson: the basic requirements for the organization of the educational process]. Istoriia v shkoli – History of School, 12, 26–32 [in Ukrainian].
Mysan, V. (2010). Suchasnyi urok istorii: navchalno-metodychnyi posibnyk [Contemporary history lesson: tutorial manual]. Kyiv: Shkilnyi svit [in Ukrainian].
Onishchuk, V. (1976). Tipy, struktura i metodika uroka v shkole [Types, structure and methodology of the lesson in school]. Kiev: Radyanskaya shkola [in Russian].
Polianskyi, P. (2017). Vsesvitnia istoriia: pidruchnyk dlia 9 klasu zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [World History: Textbook for Grade 9 General Education Institutions Pavlo Polianskyi]. Kyiv: Hramota [in Ukrainian].
Pometun, O.I., Hupan, N.M., & Smahin, I.I. (2017). Istoriia Ukrainy: pidruchnyk dlia 9 klasu zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [History of Ukraine: Textbook for the 9th form of general education institutions]. Kyiv: UOVTs «Orion» [in Ukrainian].
Terletska, L. (2014). Vybir aktyvnykh metodiv navchannia v orhanizatsii navchalno-piznavalnoi diialnosti pidlitkiv [Choice of active learning methods in the organizing of educational-cognitive activity of teenagers]. Liudynoznavchi studii. Seriia «Pedahohika» – Human Studies. Series of «Pedagogy», 29 (1), 193–201 [in Ukrainian].
Turchenko, F.H., & Moroko, V.M. (2017). Istoriia Ukrainy: pidruchnyk dlia 9 klasu zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [History of Ukraine: Textbook for the 9th form of general education institutions]. Kyiv: Heneza [in Ukrainian].
Chepil, M. (2016). Zmist vykhovnoi diialnosti ukrainskykh pedahohiv Halychyny (kinets XIX – pochatok XX st.) [The activities of Ukrainian Galician teachers (late XIX – early XX centuries)]. Liudynoznavchi studii. Seriia «Pedahohika» – Human Studies. Series of «Pedagogy», 3/35, 244–254 [in Ukrainian].
Chernetska, T. (2011). Suchasnyi urok: teoriia i praktyka modeliuvannia [Contemporary Lesson: Theory and Practice of Modeling]. Kyiv: TOV «Praimdruk» [in Ukrainian].
Shchupak, I.Ya. (2017). Vsesvitnia istoriia: pidruchnyk dlia 9 klasu zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [World History: Textbook for Grade 9 General Education Institutions Pavlo Polianskyi]. Kyiv: UOVTs «Orion» [in Ukrainian].
Chiu, T. (2017). Introducing electronic textbooks as daily-use technology in schools: A top-down adoption process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 524–537. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12432 [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Human Studies: a collection of scientific articles of the Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University. Series of “Pedagogy”

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Editorial policy and ethics of the scholarly journal Human Studies. Series of Pedagogy is grounded on the recommendations of Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE), best practice of Ukrainian and international academic societies, institutions and editorial boards of scientific periodicals, and also on the Ethic Standards of Ukrainian Scientists. Scientists should be confident of reliability and soundness of their own researches and their colleagues’, as well. Unfortunately, this situation has not been flawless recently, as now and then one can face the ethics violations, which in an undermining factor for people’ trust to science and those of the academic world. To prevent such a situation in Ukraine, every researcher should be wholly concern to follow the ethic requirements and be fully aware of the public opinion forming he is responsible for.
Ethical Obligations of Authors
- An author presents a concise and accurate report of the research and an objective discussion of its significance. A primary research report should contain sufficient and clear detail and its findings should be amenable to verification by peers with no data distortion or manipulation.
- An author bears responsibility for the scientific content as well as the fact of publication.
- An author should cite those publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work and that will guide the reader quickly to the earlier work that is essential for understanding the present investigation. It is necessary that the fundamental sources used in this research, if not obtained by an author, should be properly cited.
- It is not acceptable to represent plagiarism as original work for publication or previously published articles. An Author should bear responsibility, should this be disclosed.
- Those who have contributed significantly to the research and share the responsibility for obtained results should be listed as co-authors. On submission of the manuscript, the corresponding author attests to the fact that those named as co-authors have agreed to its submission for publication and accepts the responsibility for having properly included all (and only) co-authors.
- An author should reveal to the editor any potential conflict of interest that might be affected by publication of the results contained in a manuscript.
- An author should identify the source of all information quoted or offered, all references to the sources used in the research should be provided in accordance with APA.
- The editorial board reserves the right to reject the manuscript that does not meet the set standards.
Publication Agreement and Copyright License
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written or contribution to the manuscript currently entitled ________________________________________________________________
The parties to this Agreement are: _____________________________________ (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”)
and Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, publisher and copyright owner of the Human Studies. Series of Pedagogy in the person of Rector Mrs. Skotna N.V. (“Publisher”).
1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, and use the Work in any form and in any media, in whole or in part, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Work in an issue of the Publication, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Work, authorize reproduction of the entire Work in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Work or an abstract thereof by the means of computerizes retrieval system. The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Work (or portion of the written by the Author), and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense, or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
c) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the World authorizes by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Work under the terms of paragraphs 1a and 1b of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
2. EDITING OF THE WORK
The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Work as suitable for inclusion in the Publication. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author. The Publisher agrees to publish the Work subject to the understanding that the Work will not be published in the Publication unless, in its final form, the Work is acceptable to both the Author and the Publisher.
3. WARRANTIES
a)The Author represents and warrants that, to the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c)The Author represents and warrants that the Work furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously.
4. TERM
This Agreement shall remain in effect for as long as copyright protection subsists in the Work as defined by the copyright laws of each country in the World.
5.PAYMENT
The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Work or the licenses granted in this Agreement, unless separately negotiated in writing. The Publisher will publish the Work and will provide the Author with print copy of the bound Publication in which the Work appears as per its normal policy. The Author will have the opportunity to order additional reprints at the Author’s expense before the Publication containing the Work goes to press.
6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Work, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party expect those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
Author(s):___________ Publisher: Skotna N.V.,
Signed:_____________ Drohobych Ivan Franko
Date:_______________ State Pedagogical University
Signed:_____________________
Date:_______________________