PEDAGOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE’S CONSCIOUSNESS FORMATION IN THE CREATIVE HERITAGE OF M. SHLEMKEVYCH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24919/2413-2039.9/41.175695Keywords:
practical aspects, development of the spiritual sphere, factors, pedagogical conditions, world outlook formation, M. ShlemkevychAbstract
KOBRII Olha – Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, General Pedagogics and Preschool Education Department, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Ivan Franko Str., 24, Drohobych, 82100, Ukraine
E-mail address: olha_kobriy@ukr.net
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3098-5878
ResearcherID: https://publons.com/researcher/1967189/olha-kobrii/
YATSIV Oksana – PhD Student at the Department of General Pedagogy and Preschool Education, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Ivan Franko Str., 24, Drohobych, 82100, Ukraine
E-mail address: 30x05x@gmail.com
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9537-398X
To cite this article: Kobrii, O., & Yatsiv, O. (2019). Pedagogical conditions for young people’s consciousness formation in the creative heritage of M. Shlemkevych. Liudynoznavchi studii. Seriia «Pedahohika» – Human Studies. Series of «Pedagogy», 9/41, 38–49. doi: 10.24919/2413-2039.9/41.175695.
Article history
Received: April 24, 2019
Received in revised form: June 7, 2019
Accepted: July 20, 2019
Available online: September 24, 2019
Journal homepage:
p-ISSN 2313-2094
e-ISSN 2413-2039
© 2019 The Authors. Human studies. Series of «Pedagogy» published by Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University & Open Journal Systems. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
The article reveals the influence of various communities on the world outlook formation in young people and pedagogical conditions for the spiritual development of Ukrainians based on the heritage of Mykola Shlemkevych, which concern the use of such methods for self-education as self-cognition, self-observation, self-assessment, self-analysis. This means that the emphasis has been placed on the person’s own participation in his/her education, thus – the research has been done on the democratic ways for the world outlook formation in every young person and expansion of his/her spiritual world.
It is substantiated that the ways of establishing spiritual values and other ideals of the good, search for means of forming humanity, that is, humanization, are the basis for expanding and enriching the inner world of man, his maturing, deep penetration into the world of moral values, self-development. There have been characterized important pedagogical conditions for the world outlook formation in Ukrainians, that have been discovered in the creative heritage of M. Shlemkevych, they are – search for ways to achieve truth, happiness, harmony in the life of society and every Ukrainian, to bring them back to spirituality, to rebuild trust in one another, to defend one’s convictions, freedom of choice, faith, work of personality, which insists in applying one’s abilities and opportunities for the perfection of society and is a means of transforming the world and, at the same time, serving one another, one’s neighbour, the family, the people, and work over oneself. It is emphasized on their practical significance for the development of personality’s spirituality and improvement of Ukrainian society and their role in shaping the consciousness of the Ukrainian young man.
There have been revealed the significance of faith for the process of young person’s world outlook formation and its role in consciousness formation and spiritual recovery of the Ukrainian society. A high level of perfection of human morality can be achieved through discovery of a Christian outlook, known ways of practicing in virtues (humility, forgiveness, repentance, prayer, confession, etc.). The idea of faith as a powerful incentive for the development of spiritual powers of man and human creativity provides grounds for seeking mechanisms to establish faith in the minds of young people.
Effective ways of moral improvement of Ukrainians, according to M. Shlemkevych, are connected with their activity, search for truth and justice in life, and presuppose suffering, overcoming obstacles, providing a state of peace, repentance, forgiveness, and testing oneself in faith. At the same time, in order to search for truth M. Shlemkevych also recommended optimism, building up trust in Ukrainians, faith in the ideals of the good, and a better future. During the implementation of the pedagogical conditions for the world outlook formation in the Ukrainians, it is important to create the national cultural and educational environment taking into account customs and traditions, peculiarities of national communication, mentality, language, national symbols, history, religion, folklore, way of life, national art.
Acknowledgments. Sincere thanks to the head of the General Pedagogy and Preschool Education Department, Drohobych Ivan Fanko State Pedagogical University, Prof. Chepil Mariya.
Funding. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
References
Artiukh, V. (2009). Pro deiaki istoriosofski idei v filosofskii publitsystytsi Mykoly Shlemkevycha: sproba ekzystentsialnoi interpretatsii [About Some Histriosophical Ideas in Philosophical Journalism of Mykola Shlemkevych: an Attempt of Existential Interpretation]. Filolohichni traktaty – Philological Treatises, 3–4 (1), 5–14 [in Ukrainian].
Ashytok, N. (2018). Methodological approaches to studying educational work with children. Liudynoznavchi studii. Seriia «Pedahohika» – Human Studies. Series of Pedagogy, 6/38, 15–25. doi: 10.24919/2313-2094.6/38.119508.
Berko, P., & Dzera, M. (2016). Svitohliadni pozytsii Mykoly Shlemkevycha kriz pryzmu antropolohichnoi ustanovky [Worldview Ideas of Mykola Shlemkevych through the Prism of the Anthropological Attitude]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii imeni S.Z. Hzhytskoho – Scientific Bulletin of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine, 18, 2 (69), 238–245 [in Ukrainian].
Chepil, M. (2016). Ivan Franko pro osobystist vchytelia kriz pryzmu sohodennia [Ivan Franko on the personality of the teacher through the lens of the present]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu imeni Alfreda Nobelia. Seriia «Pedahohika i psykholohiia» – Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University. Series «Pedagogy and Psychology», 2 (12), 61–66 [in Ukrainian].
Grogan-Kaylor, A., Burlaka, V., Ma, J., Lee, Sh., Castillo, B., & Churakova, I. (2018). Predictors of parental use of corporal punishment in Ukraine. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 66–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.003.
Mallette, J., Futris, T., & Schramm, D. (2018). Fostering a culture of family-centred care: Child welfare professionals’ beliefs about fathers, family instability, and the value of relationship education. Child & Family Social Work, 23, 354–363. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12422.
Palamar, S. (2017). Problema formuvannia dukhovno-moralnykh tsinnostei studentiv v umovakh osvitnoho seredovyshcha [The Issue of Forming Spiritual and Moral Values in Students in Conditions of Educational Environment]. Osvitolohichnyi dyskurs – Educationological Discourse, 3‒4 (18‒19), 221–233 [in Ukrainian].
Shlemkevych, M. (1956, October). Na fronti riatunku dukha. Pedahohichna konferentsiia [On the Front of Saving the Spirit]. Lysty do Pryiateliv – Letters to the Friends, 4, 10 (44), 10‒11. New York – Toronto: Kliuchi [in Ukrainian].
Shlemkevych, M. (1961a). Dyskusiia i pro dyskusiiu [Discussion and about Discussion]. Lysty do Pryiateliv – Letters to the Friends, 9, 3‒4 (97‒98), 53–56. New York – Toronto: Kliuchi [in Ukrainian].
Shlemkevych, M. (1961b, March – April). Rozdumy pro opravdannia zhyttia (peredova) [Thoughts on the Essence of Life]. Lysty do Pryiateliv – Letters to the Friends, 9, 3–4 (97–98), 1‒3. New York – Toronto: Kliuchi [in Ukrainian].
Shlemkevych, M. (1962). Zahublena ukrainska liudyna [The Lost Ukrainian Man]. Kyiv: MP Phoenix [in Ukrainian].
Skovoroda, H. (1961). Lysty do M. Kovalinskoho [Letters to Kovalinskyi]. (Vols. 1‒2; Vol. 2), (pp. 211‒390). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Vashchenko, H. (2006). Vykhovnyi ideal [Upbringing Ideal]. (Vol. 1). Lviv: Kamula [in Ukrainian].
Vyshnevskyi, O. (2006). Teoretychni osnovy suchasnoi ukrainskoi pedahohiky [Theoretical Bases of Modern Ukrainian Pedagogy]. Drohobych: Kolo [in Ukrainian].
Yermak, H. (2014). Analiz moralnoho vykhovannia u pratsiakh radianskykh i suchasnykh doslidnykiv: istorychnyi aspekt [Analysis of Moral Upbringing in Works by the Soviet and Modern Researchers]. Zbirnyk Melitopolskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni B. Khmelnytskoho. Seriia: Pedahohichni nauky – Bulletin of Melitopol State Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogical Studies, 1 (12), 262–265. doi: 10.7905/нвмдпу.v1i12.864 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Human Studies. Series of "Pedagogy"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Editorial policy and ethics of the scholarly journal Human Studies. Series of Pedagogy is grounded on the recommendations of Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE), best practice of Ukrainian and international academic societies, institutions and editorial boards of scientific periodicals, and also on the Ethic Standards of Ukrainian Scientists. Scientists should be confident of reliability and soundness of their own researches and their colleagues’, as well. Unfortunately, this situation has not been flawless recently, as now and then one can face the ethics violations, which in an undermining factor for people’ trust to science and those of the academic world. To prevent such a situation in Ukraine, every researcher should be wholly concern to follow the ethic requirements and be fully aware of the public opinion forming he is responsible for.
Ethical Obligations of Authors
- An author presents a concise and accurate report of the research and an objective discussion of its significance. A primary research report should contain sufficient and clear detail and its findings should be amenable to verification by peers with no data distortion or manipulation.
- An author bears responsibility for the scientific content as well as the fact of publication.
- An author should cite those publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work and that will guide the reader quickly to the earlier work that is essential for understanding the present investigation. It is necessary that the fundamental sources used in this research, if not obtained by an author, should be properly cited.
- It is not acceptable to represent plagiarism as original work for publication or previously published articles. An Author should bear responsibility, should this be disclosed.
- Those who have contributed significantly to the research and share the responsibility for obtained results should be listed as co-authors. On submission of the manuscript, the corresponding author attests to the fact that those named as co-authors have agreed to its submission for publication and accepts the responsibility for having properly included all (and only) co-authors.
- An author should reveal to the editor any potential conflict of interest that might be affected by publication of the results contained in a manuscript.
- An author should identify the source of all information quoted or offered, all references to the sources used in the research should be provided in accordance with APA.
- The editorial board reserves the right to reject the manuscript that does not meet the set standards.
Publication Agreement and Copyright License
This is a publication agreement and copyright license (“Agreement”) regarding a written or contribution to the manuscript currently entitled ________________________________________________________________
The parties to this Agreement are: _____________________________________ (individually, or if more than one author, collectively, “Author”)
and Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, publisher and copyright owner of the Human Studies. Series of Pedagogy in the person of Rector Mrs. Skotna N.V. (“Publisher”).
1. LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT
a) Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute, and use the Work in any form and in any media, in whole or in part, either separately or as part of a collective work, including but not limited to a nonexclusive license to publish the Work in an issue of the Publication, copy and distribute individual reprints of the Work, authorize reproduction of the entire Work in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Work or an abstract thereof by the means of computerizes retrieval system. The Author retains ownership of all rights under copyright in the Work (or portion of the written by the Author), and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
b) The Author grants to the Publisher the power to assign, sublicense, or otherwise transfer any and all licenses expressly granted to the Publisher under this Agreement.
c) Republication. The Author agrees to require that the Publisher be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the World authorizes by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the Work under the terms of paragraphs 1a and 1b of this Agreement, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is credited as the Author.
2. EDITING OF THE WORK
The Author agrees that the Publisher may edit the Work as suitable for inclusion in the Publication. To the extent that the Publisher’s edits amount to copyrightable works of authorship, the Publisher hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in such edits to the Author. The Publisher agrees to publish the Work subject to the understanding that the Work will not be published in the Publication unless, in its final form, the Work is acceptable to both the Author and the Publisher.
3. WARRANTIES
a)The Author represents and warrants that, to the best of the Author’s knowledge, the Work does not defame any person, does not invade the privacy of any person, and does not in any other manner infringe upon the rights of any person. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Publisher against all such claims.
b) The Author represents and warrants that the Author has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the licenses granted in this Agreement.
c)The Author represents and warrants that the Work furnished to the Publisher has not been published previously.
4. TERM
This Agreement shall remain in effect for as long as copyright protection subsists in the Work as defined by the copyright laws of each country in the World.
5.PAYMENT
The Author agrees and acknowledges that the Author will receive no payment from the Publisher for use of the Work or the licenses granted in this Agreement, unless separately negotiated in writing. The Publisher will publish the Work and will provide the Author with print copy of the bound Publication in which the Work appears as per its normal policy. The Author will have the opportunity to order additional reprints at the Author’s expense before the Publication containing the Work goes to press.
6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
a. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the Author and the Publisher with respect to the subject of this Agreement. This Agreement contains all of the warranties and agreements between the parties with respect to the Work, and each party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements have been made by or on behalf of any party expect those warranties and agreements embodied in this Agreement.
Author(s):___________ Publisher: Skotna N.V.,
Signed:_____________ Drohobych Ivan Franko
Date:_______________ State Pedagogical University
Signed:_____________________
Date:_______________________
