Grain sorghum yield as affected by row spacing and fertilization practice

Authors

  • S. M. Kalenska National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  • V. M. Naidenko National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47414/np.26.2018.211203

Keywords:

grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), hybrid, yield, inter-row spacing, fertilization

Abstract

Purpose. To establish varietal characteristics of yield formation in grain sorghum as affected by row spacing and fertilization system.

Methods. The field experiment was carried out during the 2015–2017 period in a multifactorial stationary experiment in LLC Biotech LTD located in the central part of Boryspil district (Kyiv region) of the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Experiment design: factor A – hybrid: ‘Lan 59’, ‘Burgo F1’, ‘Briggo F1’; factor B – dose of nitrogen fertilizers: N60P60K60 (control), N60P60K60 + N20, N60P60K60 + N40, N60P60K60 + N60; factor C – row spacing: 35 cm, 50 cm, 70 cm.

Results. The average yield of grain sorghum for years of research ranged from 3.98 to 9.14 t/ha, depending on hybrid, row spacing and fertilization practice. It was also found that average grain yield in 2015 amounted to 7.29 t/ha; 2016 was critical with regard to weather conditions – the realization of the biological potential of sorghum plants was significantly lower – at the level 6.33 t/ha; in 2017, the average yield was 7.15 t/ha of grain. Among the hybrids, the least productive was ‘Lan 59’ (5.14 t/ha), and an average yield of ‘Burgo F1’ and ‘Briggo F1’ were 7.57 and 8.06 t/ha, respectively. The maximum yield for all hybrids was formed at the 50-cm row spacing, namely ‘Lan 59’ – 5.40,” ‘Briggo F1’ – 8.48 t/ha and ‘Burgo F1’ – 7.86 t/ha, respectively. With the pre-sowing application of N60 compared to N20, the yield of hybrid ‘Lan 59’ grew by 0.41–0.51 t/ha, ‘Briggo F1’ by 0.27–0.40, ‘Burgo F1’ by 0.22–0.29 t/ha.

Conclusions. The biggest share in sorghum yield formation had the ‘hybrid’ factor (43%). ‘Conditions of year’ factor (21%) and ‘dose of nitrogen’ (20%) had an equivalent effect, and ‘inter-row spacing’ factor amounted to 10%. Studies have shown that there is a positive moderate correlation between yield and dose of pre-sowing nitrogen (r = 0.49). Grain sorghum plants react positively to additional nitrogen, what is manifested in increased yields. This dependence can be explained not only by moderate nitrogen application rates but also by the low level of hydrolyzed nitrogen stock in the soil of the experimental plot.

References

Pale, S., Mason, S. C., & Taonda, S. J. B. (2009). Water and fertilizer influence on yield of grain sorghum varieties produced in Burkina Faso. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil., 26(2), 91–97. doi: 10.1080/02571862.2009.10639939

Kalenska, S. M., & Hryniuk, I. P. (2013). Peculiarities of growth and development of sorghum plants as affected by species, varietal features and fertilization practice under the conditions of the Right Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Nauk. pracì Ìnst. bìoenerg. kulʹt. cukrov. burâkìv [Scientific Papers of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet], 17(1), 359–363. [in Ukrainian]

Foszczynska, B., Dziuba, E., Chmielewska, J., & Sowiński, J. (2014). The use of sorgo malt for beer production. Przemysl Chemiczny, 93(6), 1444–1446. doi: 10.12916/przemchem.2014.1444

Lafarge, T. D., Broad, I. J., & Hammer, G. L. (2002). Tillering in grain sorghum over a wide range of population densities: identification of a common hierarchy for tiller emergence, leaf area development and fertility. Ann. Bot., 90(1), 87–98. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf152

Krzystek, L., Wajszczuk, K., Pazera, A., Sitarski, A., & Ledakowicz, S. (2018). Analiza energetyczna produkcji biogazu z wybranychodmian sorgo [Energy efficiency of biogas production from sorghum varieties]. Acta Sci. Pol. Biotechnol., 17(1), 69–76. doi: 10.30825/5.biot.51.2018.17.1 [in Polish]

Uchida, S., & Hayashi, K. (2012). Comparative life cycle assessment of improved and conventional cultivation practices for energy crops in Japan. Biomass and Bioenergy, 36, 302–315. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.043

Krasninkov, S. V. (1993). Sorhum and sudan grass. In Yak vyroshchuvaty vysoki vrozhai zernovykh kultur u kolektyvnykh i fermerskykh hospodarstvakh stepovoi zony [How to grow high yields of grain crops in collective enterprises and farms of the Steppe zone of Ukraine] (pp. 24–26). Dnipropetrovsk: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (Eds.)]. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.

Katayama, K., Ito, O., Adu-Gyamfi, J., Pradyumna Rao, T., Dacanay, E. V., & Yoneyamam, T. (1999). Effects of NPK fertilizer combinations on yield and nitrogen balance in sorghum or pigeonpea on a vertisol in the semi-arid tropics. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 45(1), 143–150. doi: 10.1080/00380768.1999.10409330

Shepel, N. A. (1989). Sorgo – intensivnaya kul'tura [Sorghum is an intensive crop]. Simferopol: Tavriya. [in Russian]

Ermantraut, E. R., Hoptsii, T. I., Kalenska, S. M., Kryvoruchenko, R. V., Turchynova, N. P., Prysiazhniuk, O. I. (2014). Metodyka selektsiinoho eksperymentu (u roslynnytstvi) [Methods of breeding experiment (in plant science)]. Kharkiv: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Krishnareddy, S. R., Stewart, B. A., Payne, W. A., Robinson, C. A., & Thomason, R. C. (2006). Tillering in dryland grain sorghum clumps as influenced by light, planting density and geometry. Southern Conservation Systems Conference (pp. 162–170). June 26–28, 2006, Amarillo, TX.

Klyuchnikov, N. A., Bel'tyukov, L. P., & Agafonov, E. V. (2002). Efficiency of grain sorghum as affected by mineral nutrition. Kukuruza i sorgo [Corn and sorghum], 2, 22–23. [in Russian]

Cherenkov, A. V., Shevchenko, M. S., Dziubetskyi, B.V., Cherchel, V. Yu., Bodenko, N. A., Yalanskyi, O. V., … Benda, R. V. (2011). Sorhovi kultury: tekhnolohiia, vykorystannia, hibrydy ta sorty [Sorghum crops: technology, use, hybrids and varieties]. Dnipropetrovsk: Royal Print. [in Ukrainian]

Schatz, B. G., Schneiter, A. A., & Gardner, J. E. (1990). Effect of plant density on grain Sorghum production in north Dakota. North Dakota Farm Res., 47(5), 15–17.

Kalenska, S., Rakhmetov, J., Kalenskiy, V., Iunyk, A., Kachura, I., Grynyuk, I., Makareviciene, V., & Sendzikiene, E. (2013). Рrospects of sorghum (Sorghum Moench) bioenergetic potential in Ukraine. In Rural Development 2013: Innovations and Sustainability: Proceedings of the sixth Int. Sci. Conf. (Vol. 6, b. 3. pp. 60–64). Nov. 28–29, 2013, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Akademija, Lithuania.

Stevenson, F. J. (1982). Origin and distribution of nitrogen in soil. In Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils (Vol. 22. pp. 1–42). Madison: Agronomy. doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr22.c1

Zand, N., & Shakiba, M. R. (2013). Effect of plant density and nitrogen fertilizer on some attribute of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biom. Res., 1(12), 1577–1582.

Klymovych, P. V. (2006). Nitrogen supply conditions of grain sorghum plants as affected by dose and timing of nitrogen fertilizer application. Zbìrnik naukovih pracʹ Umansʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu sadìvnictva [Collection of Scientific Papers of Uman National University of Horticulture], 6, 44–50. [in Ukrainian]

Baker, C. M., & Blamey, F. P. C. (1985). Nitrogen fertilizer effects on yield and nitrogen uptake of sorghum and soybean, grown in sole cropping and intercropping systems. Field Crops Res., 12, 233–240. doi: 10.1016/ 0378-4290(85)90071-1

Katayama, K., Ito, O., Adu-gyamfi, J., Rao, T. P., Dacanay, E.V., & Yoneyama, T. (1999). Effects of NPK fertilizer combinations on yield and nitrogen balance in sorghum or pigeonpea on a vertisol in the semi-arid tropics. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 45(1), 143–150. doi: 10.1080/00380768.1999.10409330

How to Cite

Kalenska, S. M., & Naidenko, V. M. (2018). Grain sorghum yield as affected by row spacing and fertilization practice. Scientific Papers of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet, (26), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.47414/np.26.2018.211203

Issue

Section

CROP PRODUCTION